Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Compile a log format string to perl-code. For faster generation of access_log lines. Fedora Account System Username: corsepiu This package is a new required dependency of perl-Plack >= 1.0022
Hi Ralf! Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) ---> Isn't this obsoleted in recent Fedora-releases and el6? I think it will be needed on el5, only, but there are no other el5-specific bits, like BuildRoot or rm -rf %{buildroot} inside your spec?!? I'll take a review on this. :) Cheers, Björn
Package is fine. Forget about my previous question; just saw the MUST inside the Perl-pkg-guidelines. ;) ##### Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 3 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/besser82/shared/fedora/review/1008300-perl-Apache- LogFormat-Compiler/licensecheck.txt ---> License is fine [-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. ---> Those two different licenses are actually the "Perl-License" [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Apache(perl-Apache-DBI, ocsinventory-server, perl-Apache-LogRegex, perl-Apache-Session, perl-SOAP-Lite, perl-Apache- DBI-Cache, perl-Apache-Htpasswd, perl-Apache-RPC, perl-Frontier-RPC, perl-Maypole) ---> it seems to be intentional to have this dir owned by all perl-Apache-* pkgs. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [-]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Perl: [x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:. [x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned. ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. ---> Package is noarch [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13-1.fc21.noarch.rpm perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13-1.fc21.src.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.1) perl(Carp) perl(POSIX) perl(Time::Local) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Provides -------- perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler: perl(Apache::LogFormat::Compiler) perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler Source checksums ---------------- http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KA/KAZEBURO/Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : b4185125501e288efbc664da8b723ff86f0b69eb57d3c7c69c7d2069aab0efb0 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b4185125501e288efbc664da8b723ff86f0b69eb57d3c7c69c7d2069aab0efb0 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1008300 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Perl Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, SugarActivity, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EPEL5, EXARCH, DISTTAG ##### APPROVED!!!
Thanks for the review, Björn! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler Short Description: Compile a log format string to perl-code Owners: corsepiu Branches: f20 f19 f18 InitialCC: perl-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests).
perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13-1.fc19
perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13-1.fc20
perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13-1.fc18
perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.