Bug 101829 – gimp-print does not build

Bug 101829 - gimp-print does not build

Summary:	gimp-print does not build

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 101858

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	gimp-print (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	3.0
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Tim Waugh
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2003-08-07 09:44 EDT by Michael Redinger
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:06 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-02-21 13:58:00 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Michael Redinger 2003-08-07 09:44:29 EDT

The Taroon gimp-print-4.2.4-5.src.rpm package does not build correctly
on Taroon (everything install) because there are failed dependencies:

error: Failed build dependencies:
        ghostscript-devel is needed by gimp-print-4.2.4-5
        gimp-devel is needed by gimp-print-4.2.4-5

ghostscript-devel is not included in Taroon (but ghostscript is)
gimp and gimp-devel are not included in Taroon

See also bug #101828

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2003-08-07 09:48:17 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 101828 ***

Comment 2 Michael Redinger 2003-08-07 09:52:59 EDT

Hm, this is not really a duplicate of bug #101828 - note the missing "gimp-devel" 
in this report (as opposed to "gimp-print-devel" 101828).
Reopening it. Feel free to close it again. ;-)

Comment 3 Tim Waugh 2003-08-07 09:55:23 EDT

Oops, sorry.

Comment 4 Michael Redinger 2003-08-07 09:57:53 EDT

Forgot one thing:
I suppose I will find some similar bugs (missing build prereqs).
Should I file them against "distribution" or should I use the appropriate
package (and leave it to the maintainer to reassign the bug if needed)?

Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2003-08-07 16:04:42 EDT

File them against the package, so we can weed out incorrect/missing
buildprereqs, or incorrectly omitted -devel packages. Once those are verified as
being correct, we can then close the bug appropriately.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 101858 ***

Comment 6 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 13:58:00 EST

Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.