Description of problem: Just ran a fedora-review command and got following warnings WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckAddMavenDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckAddMavenDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckBundledJars in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckBundledJars in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckJPackageRequires in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckJPackageRequires in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckJavadoc in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckJavadoc in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckJavadocJPackageRequires in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckJavadocJPackageRequires in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckJavadocdirName in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckJavadocdirName in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckLocalDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckLocalDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNewStyleMaven in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNewStyleMaven in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNoArch in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNoArch in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNoOldMavenDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNoOldMavenDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNoRequiresPost in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNoRequiresPost in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNotJavaApplicable in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNotJavaApplicable in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckPomInstalled in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckPomInstalled in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckTestSkip in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckTestSkip in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckUpdateDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckUpdateDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckUpstremBuildMethod in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckUpstremBuildMethod in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckUseMavenpomdirMacro in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckUseMavenpomdirMacro in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora-review-0.5.0-1.fc20.noarch maven-local-3.3.1-1.fc20.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.run fedora-reivew on any bugzilla review 2. observe log on commandline 3. Actual results: warn for java packaging check. found two packages providing same plugin Expected results: should not warn and maven-local should not provide any fedora-review plugin Additional info:
No response for fedora-review component, moving to maven-local.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1022398 ***
how can this be duplicate?
I can confirm this bug still exists even after I updated javapackages-tools only using commit given in bug 1022398. fedora-review command still showed me WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckAddMavenDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckAddMavenDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckBundledJars in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckBundledJars in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckJPackageRequires in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckJPackageRequires in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckJavadoc in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckJavadoc in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckJavadocJPackageRequires in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckJavadocJPackageRequires in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckJavadocdirName in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckJavadocdirName in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckLocalDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckLocalDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNewStyleMaven in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNewStyleMaven in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNoArch in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNoArch in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNoOldMavenDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNoOldMavenDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNoRequiresPost in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNoRequiresPost in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNotJavaApplicable in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNotJavaApplicable in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckPomInstalled in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckPomInstalled in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckTestSkip in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckTestSkip in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckUpdateDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckUpdateDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckUpstremBuildMethod in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckUpstremBuildMethod in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckUseMavenpomdirMacro in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckUseMavenpomdirMacro in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc we can easily observe that first set of files are from fedora-review-0.5.0-1.fc20.noarch and another set of files are from fedora-review-plugin-java-3.3.1-1.fc20.noarch
It looks like fedora-review-plugin-java should conflict with older versions of fedora-review (before the split) to prevent this kind of warnings.
any updates I still see following WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckAddMavenDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckAddMavenDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckBundledJars in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckBundledJars in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckJPackageRequires in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckJPackageRequires in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckJavadoc in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckJavadoc in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckJavadocJPackageRequires in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckJavadocJPackageRequires in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckJavadocdirName in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckJavadocdirName in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckLocalDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckLocalDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNewStyleMaven in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNewStyleMaven in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNoArch in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNoArch in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNoOldMavenDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNoOldMavenDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNoRequiresPost in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNoRequiresPost in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckNotJavaApplicable in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckNotJavaApplicable in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckPomInstalled in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckPomInstalled in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckTestSkip in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckTestSkip in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckUpdateDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckUpdateDepmap in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckUpstremBuildMethod in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckUpstremBuildMethod in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc WARNING: Duplicate checks CheckUseMavenpomdirMacro in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java.pyc, CheckUseMavenpomdirMacro in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/java_guidelines.pyc
Sochotni, Oh ok. All warnings are same and got repeated thrice in this bug. Sorry for that. Something went wrong while I replied above and used fedora-review command, which ate my laptop's cpu and memory to forcefully reboot the laptop. But this is really annoying for me when I use fedora-review command. Is there any way fedora-review command not to show any log messages at all except last one that will show failed or successful message?
This looks fixed already. Lets close this.