Hi, In the nightly dir(https://sourceforge.net/projects/opentk/files/opentk/nightly/), there is a new zipball: opentk-2013-11-12.zip Please update to this version on f19+. ------------ And it seems that only Fedora uses upper-case in its name, from upstream tarball I can't see OpenTK. Only opentk-xxx.zip. Or can you add virtual provides of opentk? Why did you rename it to OpenTk in bug 890872? Thanks!
Will update. Cannot remember the exact reason for the renaming, but there was some :) Providing opentk is not a problem.
So the reason was, that this package provides mono(OpenTK), not mono(opentk). However, now it has: Provides: opentk = %{version}-%{release} I have no idea why they've released new nightly build, while the only new commits adds community branch, but I've added the new version as the source (the tarballs are the same anyway). Should I make this an update or you know something I don't (e.g. the nightly build is form the community branch)?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6226642
Hmm.. I have no ideas now...Have you got any replies from upstream to clarify the source reference?? Or this tag: https://github.com/opentk/opentk/releases? Alright, please just leave this bug here, I will test the scratch build later, before feedbacks reported, don't do anything ;) And if we really need to update it, just from f20 ;-)
Oh, I didn't know they are on GitHub :( Will ask them directly.
This seeems prety obvious, my fault: http://www.opentk.com/opentk-repository-in-github So let's pack 1.1 beta1 for Fedora 20 then, OK?
GOOD.
Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6226814 F20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6226817 I'll check if RepetierHost builds and runs against it.
RepetierHost builds but doesn't run. https://github.com/repetier/Repetier-Host/issues/269
It should run with current rc, but that requires bz1058765
Hi, I just found the real version should be 1.1 now. http://sourceforge.net/projects/opentk/files/opentk/opentk-1.1/ And the latest is stable 5. My thought is that treat the number 5 as patchlevel so it should be 1.1.5, right? And what about the date? Anyway please update again... ;)
This is blocked by #1058765 and I would appreciate any help with the test suite there (I'm not able to make it run)
Prepared in "cecil" branch. Builds fine in mock with mono-cecil.
OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc21
OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc21,mono-cecil-0.9.5-3.20140924git6d1b7d0.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc21,mono-cecil-0.9.5-3.20140924git6d1b7d0.fc21
Package OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc21, mono-cecil-0.9.5-3.20140924git6d1b7d0.fc21: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc21 mono-cecil-0.9.5-3.20140924git6d1b7d0.fc21' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17689/OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc21,mono-cecil-0.9.5-3.20140924git6d1b7d0.fc21 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc21, mono-cecil-0.9.5-3.20140924git6d1b7d0.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.