Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1083211

Summary:	Allow AGEING to be set in ifcfg-* scripts
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	Jake Hunsaker <jhunsaker>
Component:	ovirt-node	Assignee:	Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Pavel Stehlik <pstehlik>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	3.3.0	CC:	aberezin, dfediuck, iheim, initscripts-maint-list, jamills, jhunsaker, psklenar, ycui, yeylon, ylavi
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	3.6.0
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	node
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1082765	Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-03-04 11:09:33 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Node	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1082765
Bug Blocks:	1083694

Comment 1 Fabian Deutsch 2014-04-01 18:57:59 UTC

Hey Jake,

there seem to be three parts involved:
1. sysv / NM support
2. RHEV-H core support to set AGEING
3. RHEV-M support to set AGEING

2 and 3 depend on 1.

2. Is needed to set AGEING for the initial bridge, if it was created on RHEV-H
3. Is needed to support AGEING by on all bridges which are created by RHEV-M

And we should have bugs for all three of them.

I consider the link to the patch to be relevant for 1. -- Is there a downstream bug to track the state of that patch in RHEL?
RHEV-H will be picking up this change as soon as there is a new build with that patch.

This bug can be seen to track issue 2.

But you will probably also need a bug to address 3. - RHEV-M setting AGEING as well. They might also already support it.

Comment 2 Jake Hunsaker 2014-04-02 18:29:51 UTC

Fabian,

BZ #1082765 is for including this in RHEL

Opened BZ #1083694 for setting this via RHEV-M

Comment 5 Arthur Berezin 2014-05-04 14:49:13 UTC

We should inherit the fix from rhel 6.6, not sure what effect would it make to raise prio here..

Comment 6 Fabian Deutsch 2014-11-06 14:54:05 UTC

Re-targeting for 3.6

Comment 7 Yaniv Lavi 2015-03-04 11:09:33 UTC

This is fixed in RHEV 3.5 as part of BZ #1044042. Please let the customer know.