Bug 1090117 - dnf does not show updates, but yum does
Summary: dnf does not show updates, but yum does
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: dnf
Version: 20
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Packaging Maintenance Team
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1103552 1141481 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-04-22 15:47 UTC by spital
Modified: 2014-09-16 04:59 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-04-28 05:43:32 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description spital 2014-04-22 15:47:44 UTC
Description of problem:

trying dnf, it does not show updates, but yum does

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

dnf 0.4.20


Steps to Reproduce:

dnf update

Actual results:

dnf shows nothing to do, but yum update shows 100 MB to update

Expected results:

dnf should work

Additional info:

this helped:

dnf clean all
dnf makecache
dnf update

possible cause : Installed on minimal fedora, possibly no automatic cache updates, simple dnf makecache did not help

Comment 1 Ales Kozumplik 2014-04-22 19:42:26 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1088166 ***

Comment 2 spital 2014-04-25 05:46:10 UTC
reopened, because I do not think 
"DNF doesn't say you need root rights to run dnf update" 
has anything to do with 
"dnf does not show updates, but yum does".

I ran it as root of course.

Comment 3 Ales Kozumplik 2014-04-25 06:28:18 UTC
Sorry, wrong bug. This is rather a dupe of bug 1046355.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1046355 ***

Comment 4 spital 2014-04-26 16:35:12 UTC
reopened because I said "I ran it as root of course"

"dnf does not show updates, but yum does" has nothing to do with

"incosistentupdates list - dnf update - compared to - sudo dnf update"

it must be amazing stuff they give people in Red Hat ;)

Comment 6 Ales Kozumplik 2014-04-28 05:43:32 UTC
Sorry, looks like we don't have an original bug for this yet. Anyway, what you are seeing is the expected behavior, please see the document Tim links in comment 5.

Comment 7 Ales Kozumplik 2014-06-02 06:24:48 UTC
*** Bug 1103552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Ales Kozumplik 2014-09-15 10:16:26 UTC
*** Bug 1141481 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.