Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1188161

Summary: Change reference in backup help\notification from engine-backup to RHEV kbase\docs on backups.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: Yaniv Lavi <ylavi>
Component: ovirt-engineAssignee: Yaniv Lavi <ylavi>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Gonza <grafuls>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 3.5.0CC: jbelka, lsurette, oourfali, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, srevivo, ykaul, ylavi
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-09-07 14:38:48 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Infra RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1188127, 1188156    
Bug Blocks: 1188147    

Description Yaniv Lavi 2015-02-02 08:03:51 UTC
Description of problem:
Change link in backup not preformed notification from oVirt wiki page to RHEV kbase. Should be done as part of RHEVM branding.

Comment 1 Yaniv Lavi 2015-05-05 12:23:01 UTC
*** Bug 1217405 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Oved Ourfali 2015-08-31 08:21:31 UTC
Where is there such a link?

Comment 3 Yaniv Lavi 2015-08-31 08:26:33 UTC
(In reply to Oved Ourfali from comment #2)
> Where is there such a link?

In the event that is displayed in the WebAdmin.

Comment 4 Oved Ourfali 2015-08-31 11:14:19 UTC
Please give a screenshot or something.
I've checked with Eli and we don't have any URL we point to.

Comment 5 Oved Ourfali 2015-09-03 05:58:47 UTC
We don't have any links in the UI, so nothing to change.
Closing as NOTABUG.

Comment 6 Yaniv Lavi 2015-09-03 08:31:38 UTC
what is the notifaction text then?

Comment 7 Eli Mesika 2015-09-03 08:52:56 UTC
(In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #6)
> what is the notifaction text then?

 There is no full backup available, please run engine-backup to prevent data loss in case of corruption.

Comment 8 Yaniv Lavi 2015-09-03 08:58:39 UTC
(In reply to Eli Mesika from comment #7)
> (In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #6)
> > what is the notifaction text then?
> 
>  There is no full backup available, please run engine-backup to prevent data
> loss in case of corruption.

Then we will need to change this for downstream to include either a link or a ref to docs on backups which are more extensive in RHEV.

Comment 9 Oved Ourfali 2015-09-03 09:15:38 UTC
(In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #8)
> (In reply to Eli Mesika from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #6)
> > > what is the notifaction text then?
> > 
> >  There is no full backup available, please run engine-backup to prevent data
> > loss in case of corruption.
> 
> Then we will need to change this for downstream to include either a link or
> a ref to docs on backups which are more extensive in RHEV.

We don't have links anywhere in our system.
Also, I don't think branding supports that. Einav?

What's the difference between that and every other feature clients don't know? I don't think we should give messages with links....

Comment 10 Einav Cohen 2015-09-03 12:35:52 UTC
I don't think branding support that. 
We should really try and aim for values that will fit both upstream and downstream (like "Foreman/Satellite" that we had in a different BZ). 

If absolutely impossible and a downstream change is needed - it should be done via a configuration value or something similar. 

We also don't support hyperlinks within Event's messages. Maybe a URL can be provided (preferably via a configuration value) within the Event message but it will not be displayed as a hyperlink (it could be an easy feature to implement - need to look into it - but it would be a new feature, and we are already way past feature freeze).

Comment 11 Oved Ourfali 2015-09-04 06:14:51 UTC
I don't think that it is needed. 
Yaniv, either move it to 4.0, or close it.

Comment 12 Yaniv Kaul 2016-03-10 15:16:41 UTC
What needs to be done here for 4.0?

Comment 13 Oved Ourfali 2016-03-15 06:57:31 UTC
Repeating my comment from above.
I don't think that it is needed, and we don't have proper mechanisms to do that.
I'm closing as WONTFIX.

Comment 14 Yaniv Lavi 2016-03-17 13:47:38 UTC
We need better context sensitive help. Maybe we will be able to do this in the next ui.

Comment 15 Oved Ourfali 2016-03-17 13:53:22 UTC
So add it to the next UI requirements.
Leaving this bug open is useless.
Either close it, or add a "PM" oVirt team, to contain PM related bugs/RFEs which will contain ideas you want to push forward.

Comment 16 Yaniv Lavi 2016-03-20 14:18:32 UTC
It's not coming from me, it's from the field.
Please see the dup bugs on the tracker. this was raised from them.

Comment 17 Yaniv Kaul 2017-09-04 10:52:12 UTC
Yaniv, it's currently assigned to you?

Comment 18 Yaniv Lavi 2017-09-07 14:38:48 UTC
Closing has the field have not requested any more change for now.