Bug 12080 – printerdb problem

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on December 2, 2018. The outage period for the upgrade will start at 0:00 UTC and have a duration of 12 hours

Bug 12080 - printerdb problem

Summary:	printerdb problem

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	rhs-printfilters (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.1
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Duplicates:	12774 12786 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2000-06-11 06:28 EDT by Tim Waugh
Modified:	2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2000-07-08 10:27:43 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Tim Waugh 2000-06-11 06:28:48 EDT

When trying to select a filter for a local printer I get:

Error: can't read "printerdb_desc (Lexmark5700m)": no such element in array

Comment 1 Hans de Goede 2000-06-14 11:44:42 EDT

Same over here, commenting out the Lexmark5700m section in printerdb fixes it
for me, thris section seems to be fine however.

Comment 2 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2000-06-17 11:35:33 EDT

Thanks, fixed.
Actually the section wasn't ok - it was lacking a BitsPerPixel entry, and
printtool can be VERY picky.

Comment 3 Tim Waugh 2000-06-21 04:11:29 EDT

*** Bug 12774 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2000-06-21 19:42:52 EDT

*** Bug 12786 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Gene Czarcinski 2000-06-25 06:17:07 EDT

Please reopen this bug.  This still occurs on beta2.

Comment 6 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2000-06-25 06:25:08 EDT

No need - beta2 is obsolete. ;)
It was fixed after that.

Comment 7 Hans de Goede 2000-07-08 10:27:41 EDT

Still there in beta3, reopening.

Comment 8 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2000-07-10 16:46:20 EDT

Oops, fixed it in CVS and forgot to build a new package...
Done now (1.71).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.