Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 12080 - printerdb problem
printerdb problem
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: rhs-printfilters (Show other bugs)
7.1
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
:
: 12774 12786 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2000-06-11 06:28 EDT by Tim Waugh
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-07-08 10:27:43 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Tim Waugh 2000-06-11 06:28:48 EDT 
When trying to select a filter for a local printer I get:

Error: can't read "printerdb_desc (Lexmark5700m)": no such element in array
Comment 1 Hans de Goede 2000-06-14 11:44:42 EDT 
Same over here, commenting out the Lexmark5700m section in printerdb fixes it
for me, thris section seems to be fine however.
Comment 2 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2000-06-17 11:35:33 EDT 
Thanks, fixed.
Actually the section wasn't ok - it was lacking a BitsPerPixel entry, and
printtool can be VERY picky.
Comment 3 Tim Waugh 2000-06-21 04:11:29 EDT 
*** Bug 12774 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2000-06-21 19:42:52 EDT 
*** Bug 12786 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Gene Czarcinski 2000-06-25 06:17:07 EDT 
Please reopen this bug.  This still occurs on beta2.
Comment 6 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2000-06-25 06:25:08 EDT 
No need - beta2 is obsolete. ;)
It was fixed after that.
Comment 7 Hans de Goede 2000-07-08 10:27:41 EDT 
Still there in beta3, reopening.
Comment 8 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2000-07-10 16:46:20 EDT 
Oops, fixed it in CVS and forgot to build a new package...
Done now (1.71).
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.