RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1208649 - [RA] unused named_sdb parameter for named
Summary: [RA] unused named_sdb parameter for named
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: luci
Version: 6.7
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: 6.8
Assignee: Ryan McCabe
QA Contact: cluster-qe@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1009309 1208647 1208789
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-04-02 19:00 UTC by Jan Pokorný [poki]
Modified: 2016-05-11 00:17 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: luci-0.26.0-73.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1208647
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-11 00:17:19 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:0892 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE luci bug fix and enhancement update 2016-05-10 22:49:50 UTC

Description Jan Pokorný [poki] 2015-04-02 19:00:40 UTC
There seems to be no point exposing that parameter as it is completely
futile and always was.

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1208647 +++

This discrepancy introduced with
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/commit/5668b8cfc4e0e64f166f5c0cbbb4dfd04e5813d1
([bug 213524]), i.e., since beginning (parameter introduced and never
ever used).

Hard to say what to do about that, I realized the resulting schema
for validations is add-or-update-only (no prunning).

Similar to previous:
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1201285 +++

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2016-05-11 00:17:19 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0892.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.