RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Steven,

it would be a good idea to mark named_sdb parameter for named as unused:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html-single/Cluster_Administration/index.html#tb-named-resource-CA

e.g., 
- If enabled, specifies to use the Simplified Database Backend.
+ Reserved, currently unused.

Also, there is a typo in this very table for named_options: coomand-line


+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1208647 +++

This discrepancy introduced with
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/commit/5668b8cfc4e0e64f166f5c0cbbb4dfd04e5813d1
([bug 213524]), i.e., since beginning (parameter introduced and never
ever used).

Hard to say what to do about that, I realized the resulting schema
for validations is add-or-update-only (no prunning).

Similar to previous:
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1201285 +++

I have made this update and this correction to the working draft of the 6.7 version of this document. This will be reflected in the 6.7 beta release.