Bug 1313321 - Lifecycle Environment Page does not render in Firefox
Summary: Lifecycle Environment Page does not render in Firefox
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Branding
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Shimon Shtein
QA Contact: Og Maciel
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1313322 1321852 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-01 11:46 UTC by Mike McCune
Modified: 2019-09-26 15:41 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-27 11:12:57 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
screenshot (16.77 KB, image/png)
2016-03-01 11:49 UTC, Mike McCune 		no flags Details
Firefox on the left, chrome on the right. Both < 1000px (255.31 KB, image/png)
2016-03-02 15:39 UTC, Walden Raines 		no flags Details
screenshot of snap6 (127.76 KB, image/png)
2016-03-31 19:48 UTC, Corey Welton 		no flags Details
View All

Description Mike McCune 2016-03-01 11:46:16 UTC 
Firefox 44.0.2

Navigate to Content -> Lifecycle Environments and note the rendering problems.

See attached screenshot.
Comment 1 Mike McCune 2016-03-01 11:49:11 UTC 
Created attachment 1131881 [details]
screenshot
Comment 2 Mike McCune 2016-03-01 11:51:26 UTC 
It seems to have something to do with page width. If I make the browser window beyond 1000px it appears to render OK.

Also behaves the same in Chrome as well.
Comment 3 Og Maciel 2016-03-01 11:56:41 UTC 
*** Bug 1313322 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Walden Raines 2016-03-02 15:38:52 UTC 
I believe this to be a duplicate of bug #1295922.

In master everything looks as expected.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1295922 ***
Comment 7 Walden Raines 2016-03-02 15:39:56 UTC 
Created attachment 1132376 [details]
Firefox on the left, chrome on the right.  Both < 1000px
Comment 8 Walden Raines 2016-03-02 16:25:32 UTC 
(In reply to Walden Raines from comment #6)
> I believe this to be a duplicate of bug #1295922.
> 
> In master everything looks as expected.
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1295922 ***

This appears to be unrelated to bug #1295922, sorry for the confusion.
Comment 14 Brad Buckingham 2016-03-29 16:12:59 UTC 
*** Bug 1321852 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Corey Welton 2016-03-31 19:46:03 UTC 
Does not appear to be fully rectified in snap6

See forthcoming attachment.
Comment 16 Corey Welton 2016-03-31 19:48:16 UTC 
Created attachment 1142355 [details]
screenshot of snap6
Comment 18 Shimon Shtein 2016-04-03 15:30:01 UTC 
@tbrisker, I can't find where this max-height is coming from in prod. I don't see it in our files anywhere.

Help is much appreciated...
Comment 19 Tomer Brisker 2016-04-06 04:53:19 UTC 
We found the source, looks like an older version of the theme was still being used in the latest snap, should be fixed once newer version is built.
Comment 23 Og Maciel 2016-04-11 15:08:15 UTC 
Marking as VERIFIED on SNAP 7.1.
Comment 24 Bryan Kearney 2016-07-27 11:12:57 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1501
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.