Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 1337784 - [RFE] SW deployment on already existing infrastructure (split stack - part2)
[RFE] SW deployment on already existing infrastructure (split stack - part2)
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-tripleo-heat-templates (Show other bugs)
10.0 (Newton)
Unspecified Unspecified
medium Severity medium
: Upstream M3
: 11.0 (Ocata)
Assigned To: Emilien Macchi
Gurenko Alex
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trip...
upstream_milestone_ocata-rc1 upstream...
: FutureFeature, Triaged
: 1189161 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1337778 1433714 1433722
Blocks: 1337783 1419190
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2016-05-20 01:15 EDT by Jaromir Coufal
Modified: 2017-05-17 15:30 EDT (History)
20 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-6.0.0-0.6.el7ost
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-17 15:30:42 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2017:1245 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat OpenStack Platform 11.0 Bug Fix and Enhancement Advisory 2017-05-17 19:01:50 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Jaromir Coufal 2016-05-20 01:15:37 EDT 
Blueprint: [see URL]

Separate deployment phase of:
1) Hardware
2) Software
Comment 1 RHEL Product and Program Management 2016-08-02 07:38:06 EDT 
Quality Engineering Management has reviewed and declined this request.
You may appeal this decision by reopening this request.
Comment 4 Jaromir Coufal 2016-08-08 11:43:44 EDT 
Renaming RFE heading per discussion and separation in the DFG spreadsheet. This RFE is about to cover only the SW deployment part.
Comment 5 Jaromir Coufal 2016-10-18 10:21:44 EDT 
*** Bug 1189161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Jaromir Coufal 2016-11-10 16:15:03 EST 
USER STORIES:

* As a cloud operator, I want to deploy RHOSP on already existing pre-provisioned architecture so that I can integrate with other tools which provisioned the nodes for me.

* As a cloud operator, I want to keep my SW lifecycle management via RHOSP director while still providing pre-provisioned nodes via another tool so that I can integrate with other tools which provisioned the nodes for me.
Comment 13 Mike Burns 2017-03-29 09:51:25 EDT 
All patches in the attached blueprint appear merged, so moving this to Modified.
Comment 16 Gurenko Alex 2017-05-15 02:30:17 EDT 
Apologies for the delay, automation for testing took a while, the feature itself is working fine for quite some time.
Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2017-05-17 15:30:42 EDT 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017:1245
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.