Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Regression on ./tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.t has failed 12 times in last 7 days. Regression Link: http://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/363/consoleText Node: slave27.cloud.gluster.org Regression Link: http://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/355/consoleText Node: slave33.cloud.gluster.org Regression Link: http://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/322/consoleText Node: slave25.cloud.gluster.org Regression Link: http://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/297/consoleText Node: slave1.cloud.gluster.org Regression Link: http://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/290/consoleText Node: slave33.cloud.gluster.org Regression Link: http://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/287/consoleText Node: slave1.cloud.gluster.org Regression Link: http://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/282/consoleText Node: slave24.cloud.gluster.org Regression Link: http://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/250/consoleText Node: slave25.cloud.gluster.org Regression Link: http://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/246/consoleText Node: slave26.cloud.gluster.org Regression Link: http://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/232/consoleText Node: slave24.cloud.gluster.org Regression Link: http://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/213/consoleText Node: slave1.cloud.gluster.org Regression Link: http://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/187/consoleText Node: slave33.cloud.gluster.org
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15353 (gfapi: Mark tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.t bad until it is fixed) posted (#1) for review on master by Poornima G (pgurusid)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/15353 committed in master by Raghavendra Talur (rtalur) ------ commit 4ac0cf9c7ba7d98cc21b88aa6d7aa9f7c8884a67 Author: Poornima G <pgurusid> Date: Tue Aug 30 18:10:16 2016 +0530 gfapi: Mark tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.t bad until it is fixed Change-Id: Ia0493ce7e71050b3e8a1a1fed2d861cc141a0f94 BUG: 1371540 Signed-off-by: Poornima G <pgurusid> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/15353 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur>
This patch only disables the test case. I guess the purpose of this bug is to fix the failure. Therefore moving the bug to ASSIGNED state.
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15603 (tests: gfapi/bug1291259.c should only call glfs_free() on success) posted (#1) for review on master by Niels de Vos (ndevos)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/15603 committed in master by Niels de Vos (ndevos) ------ commit d73ca4a5bfad1e46dfc4a3a12401d8720b05c298 Author: Niels de Vos <ndevos> Date: Fri Sep 30 12:55:40 2016 +0200 tests: gfapi/bug1291259.c should only call glfs_free() on success In case glfs_h_poll_upcall() does not return success, the 'struct glfs_upcall' would not have been allocated. A retry will be done and glfs_free() is called on the unallocated structure. In case the pointer does not point to NULL, glfs_free() will try to free up some random area. Change-Id: I38788d3bf22bbac3924f25edf45cd4a2637fa777 BUG: 1371540 Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/15603 NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: jiffin tony Thottan <jthottan>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.10.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.10.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-February/030119.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/