Description of problem: Rpm installation fails with below error Error: Transaction check error: file /etc/glusterfs/eventsconfig.json conflicts between attempted installs of glusterfs-events-3.10dev-0.51.gitc9271ff.fc24.x86_64 and glusterfs-server-3.10dev-0.51.gitc9271ff.fc24.x86_64
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15486 (eventsapi/packaging: Fix conflict during rpm install) posted (#1) for review on master by Aravinda VK (avishwan)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15486 (eventsapi/packaging: Fix conflict during rpm install) posted (#2) for review on master by Aravinda VK (avishwan)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/15486 committed in master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle) ------ commit 656873c4c8f5f3b05823c51f20c2a44106662550 Author: Aravinda VK <avishwan> Date: Tue Sep 13 15:38:24 2016 +0530 eventsapi/packaging: Fix conflict during rpm install RPM installation fails with following error Error: Transaction check error: file /etc/glusterfs/eventsconfig.json conflicts between attempted installs of glusterfs-events-3.10dev-0.51.gitc9271ff.fc24.x86_64 and glusterfs-server-3.10dev-0.51.gitc9271ff.fc24.x86_64 Changed attributes of eventsconfig.json file as same as other config files and excluded this file in server rpm. BUG: 1375532 Change-Id: I3708c8fc58448cd5a6ebe611250f10e0658bdd58 Signed-off-by: Aravinda VK <avishwan> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/15486 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.10.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.10.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-February/030119.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/