Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1379708

Summary: gfapi: Fix fd ref leaks
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Niels de Vos <ndevos>
Component: libgfapiAssignee: Soumya Koduri <skoduri>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Sudhir D <sdharane>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 3.8CC: bugs, sdharane, skoduri
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.8.5 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1379285 Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-20 14:04:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1379285, 1379924    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Niels de Vos 2016-09-27 13:33:51 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1379285 +++

Description of problem:

From the code inspection, have observed that there are fd ref leaks for few fd-based gfapi fops. 'glfs_resolve_fd' returns a fd (either existing or migrated) with an extra ref taken. This needs to be unref'ed at the end of the operation.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2016-09-26 11:35:39 CEST ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15573 (gfapi: Fix few fd ref leaks) posted (#1) for review on master by soumya k (skoduri)

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2016-09-27 08:43:38 CEST ---

COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/15573 committed in master by Niels de Vos (ndevos) 
------
commit d27cffab670858d7812bbb458a0833303d009b3b
Author: Soumya Koduri <skoduri>
Date:   Mon Sep 26 14:54:27 2016 +0530

    gfapi: Fix few fd ref leaks
    
    From the code inspection, have observed that there are fd ref
    leaks for few fd-based gfapi fops. 'glfs_resolve_fd' returns
    a fd (either existing or migrated) with an extra ref taken.
    This needs to be unref'ed at the end of the operation.
    
    Change-Id: Id63394e3e7deafb0c8b06444f2ae847248b126db
    BUG: 1379285
    Signed-off-by: Soumya Koduri <skoduri>
    Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/15573
    NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos>
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2016-09-28 06:38:59 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15585 (gfapi: Fix few fd ref leaks) posted (#1) for review on release-3.8 by soumya k (skoduri)

Comment 2 Worker Ant 2016-09-30 12:45:00 UTC
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/15585 committed in release-3.8 by Niels de Vos (ndevos) 
------
commit 7a50690e8939d1f806556ece1bad9fc2a81c3b80
Author: Soumya Koduri <skoduri>
Date:   Mon Sep 26 14:54:27 2016 +0530

    gfapi: Fix few fd ref leaks
    
    From the code inspection, have observed that there are fd ref
    leaks for few fd-based gfapi fops. 'glfs_resolve_fd' returns
    a fd (either existing or migrated) with an extra ref taken.
    This needs to be unref'ed at the end of the operation.
    
    Mainline reference:
    > Change-Id: Id63394e3e7deafb0c8b06444f2ae847248b126db
    > BUG: 1379285
    > Signed-off-by: Soumya Koduri <skoduri>
    > Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/15573
    > Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos>
    (cherry picked from commit d27cffab670858d7812bbb458a0833303d009b3b)
    
    Change-Id: I0919abbddb618d08aaf77b2ce1173eec18b382f1
    BUG: 1379708
    Signed-off-by: Soumya Koduri <skoduri>
    Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/15585
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos>

Comment 3 Niels de Vos 2016-10-20 14:04:15 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.8.5, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.8.5 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2016-October/000061.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/