Bug 1548563 - [RFE] rgw: implement partial order bucket/container listing (perf)
Summary: [RFE] rgw: implement partial order bucket/container listing (perf)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW
Version: 3.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
low
high
Target Milestone: rc
: 3.1
Assignee: J. Eric Ivancich
QA Contact: ceph-qe-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1584264 1595374 1595942
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-02-23 20:58 UTC by Matt Benjamin (redhat)
Modified: 2021-06-10 14:49 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-12.2.5-13.el7cp Ubuntu: 12.2.5-4redhat1xenial
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.Implementation of partial order bucket/container listing Previously, list bucket/container operations always returned elements in a sorted order. This has high overhead with sharded bucket indexes. Some protocols can tolerate receiving elements in arbitrary order so this is now allowed. An example `curl` command using this new feature: `curl GET http://server:8080/tb1?allow-unordered=True` With this update to {product}, unordered listing via Swift and S3 is supported.
Clone Of:
: 1595374 1595942 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-09-26 18:19:40 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github ceph ceph pull 21806 0 None closed luminous: rgw: ability to list bucket contents in unsorted order for efficiency 2020-09-28 16:00:16 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:2819 0 None None None 2018-09-26 18:21:35 UTC

Description Matt Benjamin (redhat) 2018-02-23 20:58:08 UTC 
Description of problem:
List Bucket/Container operations have high overhead with sharded bucket indexes due to need to return elements in sorted order--but some protocols can tolerate receiving elements in arbitary order.

Implement an Unordered listing operator for Swift and S3.


How reproducible:
100%
Comment 4 J. Eric Ivancich 2018-04-04 17:52:26 UTC 
Changed to POST.
Comment 13 J. Eric Ivancich 2018-09-17 16:00:42 UTC 
The Doc Text looks good to me.
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2018-09-26 18:19:40 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2819
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.