Bug 168213 - Review request: perl-Test-Inline - Test::Inline Perl module
Review request: perl-Test-Inline - Test::Inline Perl module
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Paul Howarth
David Lawrence
Depends On: 167282 168174 168175 168178 168187 168298 169112
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT 169247
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-09-13 11:48 EDT by Ralf Corsepius
Modified: 2014-01-21 13:05 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-10-10 21:46:25 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
limburgher: fedora‑cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch addressing review issues (1.32 KB, patch)
2005-10-07 09:23 EDT, Paul Howarth
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Ralf Corsepius 2005-09-13 11:48:19 EDT
Spec Name or Url:

SRPM Name or Url:

Test::Inline allows you to inline your tests next to the code being tested.
Comment 1 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2005-09-14 11:25:21 EDT
Damn it! New version released yesterday.
Comment 2 Ralf Corsepius 2005-09-14 12:07:30 EDT
Most interesting detail of this diff:

 build_requires ( 'Test::More'            => '0.47'    );
 build_requires ( 'Test::ClassAPI'        => '1.02'    );
-include        ( 'ExtUtils::AutoInstall'              );
 include        ( 'Test::ClassAPI'                     );

=> Not unlikely ExtUtils::AutoInstall has become superfluous (at least here)

I'll try to provide an updated package ASAP.
Comment 3 Ralf Corsepius 2005-09-14 12:42:24 EDT
Yes, the dep on ExtUtils is gone in this case, but a new one on Param::Util has

New package/spec to appear at:
Comment 6 Ralf Corsepius 2005-10-07 03:12:34 EDT
Meanwhile, all package dependencies of this package have been resolved.
I would really appreciate it, if somebody would consider to review this package.
Comment 7 Paul Howarth 2005-10-07 09:22:15 EDT
I'm back, after taking it easy for a couple of weeks due to the birth of my
first child...


- rpmlint nearly clean, see below
- package and spec file naming OK
- package meets guidelines
- license is same as perl, matches spec, text included
- spec file written in English and is legible
- sources match upstream
- package builds OK in mock on FC4 (i386)
- BR's OK; long list of versioned dependencies matches Makefile.PL
- no locales, libraries, subpackages or pkgconfigs to worry about
- not relocatable
- no directory ownership or permissions issues
- no duplicate files
- %clean section present and correct
- macro usage is consistent
- code, not content
- no large docs
- docs don't affect runtime
- no .desktop file needed
- no scriptlets


- a couple of typos/comment changes:

"# 2.100 - 2.102 ship with executable Changes" still applies to 2.103

changelog entry "Add filter-requires to filter bogus perl(strict)" should
refer to perl(script), not perl(strict)

- add BR: perl(Test::Pod) for extra test coverage


= rpmlint output:
W: perl-Test-Inline strange-permission perl-Test-Inline-filter-requires.sh 0755
script needs to be executable in SRPM or it won't work, so this is OK.

- the filter-requires script is used to filter out the bogus perl(script)
  dependency originating from Test/Inline/Content.pm


Comment 8 Paul Howarth 2005-10-07 09:23:21 EDT
Created attachment 119702 [details]
Patch addressing review issues
Comment 9 Lubomir Rintel 2014-01-21 12:52:46 EST
Package Change Request
Package Name: perl-Test-Inline
New Branches: epel7
Owners: lkundrak

The Fedora maintainer (Ralf Corsepius, corsepiu) is not willing to maintain EPEL packages.
Comment 10 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-01-21 13:05:51 EST
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.