Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/fcitx5/fedora-33-x86_64/01626592-fcitx5-qt/fcitx5-qt.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/fcitx5/fedora-33-x86_64/01626592-fcitx5-qt/fcitx5-qt-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc33.src.rpm Description: Qt library and IM module for fcitx5. Fedora Account System Username: yanqiyu
> Name: fcitx5-qt > Version: 0 > Release: 0.2%{?dist} > Summary: Qt library and IM module for fcitx5 > License: LGPLv2+ licensecheck picked up also the BSD license: fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/LICENSES/BSD-3-Clause.txt: BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License While this is only a license file, the fcitx5-qt project has this in its README on GitLab (https://gitlab.com/fcitx/fcitx5-qt): Fcitx5Qt{4,5}DBusAddons Library and Input context plugin are released under BSD. Fcitx5QtWidgetsAddons is released under LGPL2.1+. The files in question: fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/CMakeLists.txt: *No copyright* UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/Fcitx5Qt4DBusAddonsConfig.cmake.in: *No copyright* UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/fcitxqtdbustypes.cpp: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/fcitxqtdbustypes.h: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputcontextproxy.cpp: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputcontextproxy.h: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputcontextproxy_p.h: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputcontextproxyimpl.cpp: GENERATED FILE fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputcontextproxyimpl.h: GENERATED FILE fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputmethodproxy.cpp: GENERATED FILE fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputmethodproxy.h: GENERATED FILE fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/fcitxqtwatcher.cpp: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/fcitxqtwatcher.h: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/fcitxqtwatcher_p.h: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt4/dbusaddons/gen_dbus.sh: *No copyright* UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/CMakeLists.txt: *No copyright* UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/Fcitx5Qt5DBusAddonsConfig.cmake.in: *No copyright* UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtcontrollerproxy.cpp: GENERATED FILE fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtcontrollerproxy.h: GENERATED FILE fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtdbustypes.cpp: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtdbustypes.h: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputcontextproxy.cpp: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputcontextproxy.h: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputcontextproxy_p.h: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputcontextproxyimpl.cpp: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputcontextproxyimpl.h: GENERATED FILE fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputmethodproxy.cpp: GENERATED FILE fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtinputmethodproxy.h: GENERATED FILE fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtwatcher.cpp: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtwatcher.h: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/fcitxqtwatcher_p.h: UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/gen_dbus.sh: *No copyright* UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/interfaces/org.fcitx.Fcitx.Controller1.xml: *No copyright* UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/interfaces/org.fcitx.Fcitx.InputContext1.xml: *No copyright* UNKNOWN fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/qt5/dbusaddons/interfaces/org.fcitx.Fcitx.InputMethod1.xml: *No copyright* UNKNOWN The "License" field should contain "LGPLv2+ and BSD" and a comment above mentioning that the Fcitx5Qt{4,5}DBusAddons addons are BSD-licensed. Notable lines from rpmlint: > fcitx5-qt.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0-0.2.20200811git3ddd34a ['0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32', '0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a'] > fcitx5-qt.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: 0001-use-usr-libexec-instead.patch The full review matrix: Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. Review: The libfcitx-quickphrase-editor5.so SO file is for internal use. That's okay. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "GNU Lesser General Public License (v2 or later)". 111 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/fcitx5-qt/fcitx5-qt/licensecheck.txt Review: see earlier comment. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/fcitx5, /usr/lib64/fcitx5/qt5 Review: The main package can probably own the entire %{_libdir}/fcitx5/qt5/ dir, but it also needs a "Requires: fcitx5" entry. [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/fcitx5, /usr/lib64/fcitx5/qt5 Review: as above. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [!]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. Review: It doesn't and one should probably be generated. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [?]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. Review: 1 missing - see earlier comment about fcitx5. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [?]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). Review: yes, but see earlier comments about fcitx5. [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_use_rpmlint [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 2.4 starting (python version = 3.8.5)... Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins INFO: Signal handler active Start: run Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled package manager cache Start: cleaning package manager metadata Finish: cleaning package manager metadata INFO: enabled HW Info plugin Mock Version: 2.4 INFO: Mock Version: 2.4 Finish: chroot init INFO: installing package(s): /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/fcitx5-qt/fcitx5-qt-debugsource-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/fcitx5-qt/fcitx5-qt-debuginfo-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/fcitx5-qt/fcitx5-qt-devel-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/fcitx5-qt/fcitx5-qt-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 34 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk install /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/fcitx5-qt/fcitx5-qt-debugsource-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/fcitx5-qt/fcitx5-qt-debuginfo-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/fcitx5-qt/fcitx5-qt-devel-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/fcitx5-qt/fcitx5-qt-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts Rpmlint ------- Checking: fcitx5-qt-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm fcitx5-qt-devel-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm fcitx5-qt-debuginfo-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm fcitx5-qt-debugsource-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm fcitx5-qt-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.src.rpm fcitx5-qt.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0-0.2.20200811git3ddd34a ['0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32', '0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a'] fcitx5-qt-devel.x86_64: W: description-shorter-than-summary fcitx5-qt-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation fcitx5-qt.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: 0001-use-usr-libexec-instead.patch 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Unversioned so-files -------------------- fcitx5-qt: /usr/lib64/fcitx5/qt5/libfcitx-quickphrase-editor5.so fcitx5-qt: /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/platforminputcontexts/libfcitx5platforminputcontextplugin.so Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx5-qt/archive/3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425/fcitx5-qt-3ddd34aa720cb4efd451a686c389d579b1914425.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 9314c118615932073b4d65c21bd2b739e45226bcd722d2eb51d982ea249920e3 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 9314c118615932073b4d65c21bd2b739e45226bcd722d2eb51d982ea249920e3 Requires -------- fcitx5-qt (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libFcitx5Qt5DBusAddons.so.1()(64bit) libFcitx5Qt5WidgetsAddons.so.2()(64bit) libFcitx5Utils.so.2()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.14)(64bit) libQt5DBus.so.5()(64bit) libQt5DBus.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5(Qt_5.14.2_PRIVATE_API)(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libxcb.so.1()(64bit) libxkbcommon.so.0()(64bit) libxkbcommon.so.0(V_0.5.0)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) fcitx5-qt-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cmake-filesystem(x86-64) fcitx5-devel fcitx5-qt(x86-64) libFcitx5Qt5DBusAddons.so.1()(64bit) libFcitx5Qt5WidgetsAddons.so.2()(64bit) fcitx5-qt-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): fcitx5-qt-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- fcitx5-qt: fcitx5-qt fcitx5-qt(x86-64) libFcitx5Qt5DBusAddons.so.1()(64bit) libFcitx5Qt5WidgetsAddons.so.2()(64bit) libfcitx5platforminputcontextplugin.so()(64bit) fcitx5-qt-devel: cmake(Fcitx5Qt5DBusAddons) cmake(Fcitx5Qt5WidgetsAddons) cmake(fcitx5qt5dbusaddons) cmake(fcitx5qt5widgetsaddons) fcitx5-qt-devel fcitx5-qt-devel(x86-64) fcitx5-qt-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) fcitx5-qt-debuginfo fcitx5-qt-debuginfo(x86-64) fcitx5-qt-debugsource: fcitx5-qt-debugsource fcitx5-qt-debugsource(x86-64)
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" > License", "GNU Lesser General Public License (v2 or later)". 111 files > have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in > /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/fcitx5-qt/fcitx5-qt/licensecheck.txt > Review: see earlier comment. > [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. > [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/fcitx5, /usr/lib64/fcitx5/qt5 > Review: The main package can probably own the entire > %{_libdir}/fcitx5/qt5/ dir, > but it also needs a "Requires: fcitx5" entry. > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/fcitx5, > /usr/lib64/fcitx5/qt5 > Review: as above. fixed > [!]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. > Review: It doesn't and one should probably be generated. no executables in this package is designed to be called by the user, this package provides - QT libraries for other fcitx5 components - a qt5 warper > [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. > Review: 1 missing - see earlier comment about fcitx5. added fcitx5, should own the files. > [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. > [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. > [?]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. generated on copr https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/fcitx5/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01618243-fcitx5-qt/fcitx5-qt-debugsource-0-0.2.git3ddd34a.fc34.x86_64.rpm > > ===== SHOULD items ===== > > Generic: > [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. > [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. > [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). > Review: yes, but see earlier comments about fcitx5. > [?]: Package functions as described. Being tested by FZUG members : ) > > ===== EXTRA items ===== > > Generic: > [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. > Note: Mock build failed > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- > guidelines/#_use_rpmlint It builds in copr. > > > Rpmlint > ------- > Checking: fcitx5-qt-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm > fcitx5-qt-devel-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm > fcitx5-qt-debuginfo-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm > fcitx5-qt-debugsource-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.x86_64.rpm > fcitx5-qt-0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32.src.rpm > fcitx5-qt.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog > 0-0.2.20200811git3ddd34a ['0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a.fc32', > '0-0.2.20200812git3ddd34a'] Now, the version strings is different on F34 and any old version, while 0-0.N should make the update and changelog meanful > fcitx5-qt-devel.x86_64: W: description-shorter-than-summary > fcitx5-qt-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > fcitx5-qt.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: > 0001-use-usr-libexec-instead.patch The patch is applied, which can be confirmed in the build log. > 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. > > > > > Unversioned so-files > -------------------- > fcitx5-qt: /usr/lib64/fcitx5/qt5/libfcitx-quickphrase-editor5.so > fcitx5-qt: > /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/platforminputcontexts/ > libfcitx5platforminputcontextplugin.so They are for internal usage only and excluded from provides.
And I am migrating fcitx5-libs and fcitx5, that case should Requires: fcitx5 exist? autodep can do this?
I think we can ignore all Requires: fcitx5, since autodep will detect the requirement, because the all fcitx5-* is linked to libfcitx5*.so.
> no executables in this package is designed to be called by the user, this package provides > - QT libraries for other fcitx5 components > - a qt5 warper My apologies, I didn't notice that fcitx5-qt doesn't ship any binaries. You're completely right! I'm still a little confused why does fedora-review claim that "%{_libdir}/fcitx5" doesn't have an owner when fcitx5-libs clearly owns that dir in its spec file. Might be because fcitx5-libs is defined as a Requires and not BuildRequires? > I think we can ignore all Requires: fcitx5, since autodep will detect the requirement, because the all fcitx5-* is linked to libfcitx5*.so. Yes, autodep should identify the dependency based on linking. rpmlint even warns about that: fcitx5-qt.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency fcitx5-libs I would therefore remove the explicit fcitx5-libs dependency.
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #5) > > no executables in this package is designed to be called by the user, this package provides > > - QT libraries for other fcitx5 components > > - a qt5 warper > > My apologies, I didn't notice that fcitx5-qt doesn't ship any binaries. > You're completely right! > > I'm still a little confused why does fedora-review claim that > "%{_libdir}/fcitx5" doesn't have an owner when fcitx5-libs clearly owns that > dir in its spec file. Might be because fcitx5-libs is defined as a Requires > and not BuildRequires? don't know. maybe a bug in rpmlint? > > > I think we can ignore all Requires: fcitx5, since autodep will detect the requirement, because the all fcitx5-* is linked to libfcitx5*.so. > > Yes, autodep should identify the dependency based on linking. rpmlint even > warns about that: > fcitx5-qt.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency fcitx5-libs > > I would therefore remove the explicit fcitx5-libs dependency. Removed
> don't know. maybe a bug in rpmlint? Might as well be, yeah. > Removed Approved!
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fcitx5-qt
Built in rawhide