Bug 188523 - Review Request: perl-Params-Check
Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Check
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jason Tibbitts
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On: 188505
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT 188527 189042 189043 189044 189046 189047 189048
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2006-04-10 20:57 UTC by Steven Pritchard
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-04-19 14:49:01 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Steven Pritchard 2006-04-10 20:57:20 UTC
Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Params-Check/perl-Params-Check.spec
SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Params-Check-0.24-1.src.rpm
Params::Check is a generic input parsing/checking mechanism.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-04-12 01:38:12 UTC
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and
conforms to the Perl template.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  It's not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it.
* source files match upstream:
   3d135f26327b78adc9deb56252ce2381  Params-Check-0.24.tar.gz
   3d135f26327b78adc9deb56252ce2381  Params-Check-0.24.tar.gz-srpm
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (with dependencies added to a local repo)
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directory it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.


Comment 2 Steven Pritchard 2006-04-19 14:49:01 UTC
Imported into CVS and packages built.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.