Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Log-Message/perl-Log-Message.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Log-Message-0.01-1.src.rpm Description: Log::Message is a generic message storage mechanism. It allows you to store messages on a stack -- either shared or private -- and assign meta-data to it. Some meta-data will automatically be added for you, like a timestamp and a stack trace, but some can be filled in by the user, like a tag by which to identify it or group it, and a level at which to handle the message (for example, log it, or die with it).
One warning from the tests; from a quick code inspection I think this is an upstream bug. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01_Log-Message-Config....ok t/02_Log-Message...........Use of uninitialized value in regexp compilation at t/02_Log-Message.t line 87. ok All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=34, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.14 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.18 CPU) Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: f04298e81488a5a39930fd417d47656e Log-Message-0.01.tar.gz f04298e81488a5a39930fd417d47656e Log-Message-0.01.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app.
It seems I forgot the magic word. In case it wasn't obvious from the FE-ACCEPT thing, APPROVED
I've opened a ticket for the warning: http://rt.cpan.org//Ticket/Display.html?id=18845
Imported, branches created, and builds requested.