Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/alebastr/sway-extras/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01966383-foot/foot.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/alebastr/sway-extras/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01966383-foot/foot-1.6.4-0.1.fc35.src.rpm Copr URL: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/alebastr/sway-extras/ Description: Fast, lightweight and minimalistic Wayland terminal emulator. Features: * Fast * Lightweight, in dependencies, on-disk and in-memory * Wayland native * DE agnostic * User configurable font fallback * On-the-fly font resize * On-the-fly DPI font size adjustment * Scrollback search * Color emoji support * Server/daemon mode * Multi-seat * Synchronized Updates support * Sixel image support Review notes: terminfo is a subpackage that doesn't depend on the main one because: a) it is not required (i.e. foot could be configured to use another TERM definition) b) it could be installed without the main package (i.e. on remote server for ssh access) Fedora Account System Username: alebastr
LGTM. Just one minor issue. Please fix before import. Package approved. Package must own all directories that it creates: %{_datadir}/%{name}/%{name}.ini -> %{_datadir}/%{name}/ Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License", "*No copyright* Expat License". 112 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /mnt/data-linux/tmp/fedora- review/1912856-foot/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/foot [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/foot [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/terminfo/f(ncurses-term), /usr/share/fish(zola, bat, tealdeer, alacritty, ripgrep, swaylock, swayidle, flatpak, docker- compose, fish, fd-find, exa, pipx, wlogout, task, ffsend, hyperfine, exercism, fedmod, sway, ocrmypdf, cpu-x, ikona-cli-fish-completions), /usr/share/fish/vendor_completions.d(podman, zola, bat, tealdeer, alacritty, ripgrep, swaylock, swayidle, flatpak, docker-compose, podman-remote, fish, fd-find, exa, pipx, moby-engine-fish-completion, ffsend, hyperfine, exercism, fedmod, sway, ocrmypdf, cpu-x), /usr/share/zsh(skim, why3, python3-wstool, zola, git-delta, alacritty, ripgrep, caddy, curl, swaylock, vcsh, profile-cleaner, swayidle, creds, mako, reprepro, docker-compose, osmium-tool, xss-lock, ninja- build, libinput, zsh, kde-connect, playerctl, fd-find, exa, wlogout, task, ffsend, pdfgrep, etckeeper, hyperfine, mercurial, snapd, pulseaudio, gpaste, stratis-cli, exercism, fedmod, sway, catimg, awscli, cpu-x, polybar), /usr/share/zsh/site-functions(skim, why3, python3-wstool, podman, zola, buku, firewalld, git-delta, alacritty, ripgrep, caddy, curl, swaylock, vcsh, profile-cleaner, restic, profile-sync-daemon, xpanes, swayidle, creds, nnn, flatpak, mako, reprepro, docker-compose, osmium-tool, imgp, podman-remote, xss-lock, ninja-build, libinput, zsh, kde-connect, playerctl, fd-find, exa, khard, wlogout, kompose, task, arch-install-scripts, ffsend, pdfgrep, polybar, awscli, hyperfine, mercurial, fzf, snapd, flameshot, pulseaudio, gpaste, stratis-cli, exercism, googler, sway, catimg, ddgr, lastpass-cli, cpu-x, rubygem-ronn-ng) [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in foot- terminfo [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: foot-1.6.4-0.1.fc35.x86_64.rpm foot-terminfo-1.6.4-0.1.fc35.x86_64.rpm foot-debuginfo-1.6.4-0.1.fc35.x86_64.rpm foot-debugsource-1.6.4-0.1.fc35.x86_64.rpm foot-1.6.4-0.1.fc35.src.rpm foot.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) minimalistic -> minimalist, minimalism, animistic foot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US minimalistic -> minimalist, minimalism, animistic foot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US resize -> reside, re size, re-size foot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US emoji -> emotive foot-terminfo.x86_64: W: no-documentation foot.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) minimalistic -> minimalist, minimalism, animistic foot.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US minimalistic -> minimalist, minimalism, animistic foot.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US resize -> reside, re size, re-size foot.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US emoji -> emotive 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: foot-debuginfo-1.6.4-0.1.fc35.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- foot-terminfo.x86_64: W: no-documentation foot.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) minimalistic -> minimalist, minimalism, animistic foot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US minimalistic -> minimalist, minimalism, animistic foot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US resize -> reside, re size, re-size foot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US emoji -> emotive 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/archive/1.6.4.tar.gz#/foot-1.6.4.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 73142dcb7d0223ca740f880d372084b6dfdd56700c375709b3166bcaf32e034c CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 73142dcb7d0223ca740f880d372084b6dfdd56700c375709b3166bcaf32e034c Requires -------- foot (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): hicolor-icon-theme libc.so.6()(64bit) libfcft.so.3()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpixman-1.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libwayland-client.so.0()(64bit) libwayland-cursor.so.0()(64bit) libxkbcommon.so.0()(64bit) libxkbcommon.so.0(V_0.5.0)(64bit) libxkbcommon.so.0(V_0.6.0)(64bit) libxkbcommon.so.0(V_0.8.0)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) foot-terminfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ncurses-base foot-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): foot-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- foot: application() application(foot-server.desktop) application(foot.desktop) foot foot(x86-64) foot-terminfo: foot-terminfo foot-terminfo(x86-64) foot-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) foot-debuginfo foot-debuginfo(x86-64) foot-debugsource: foot-debugsource foot-debugsource(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1912856 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, C/C++ Disabled plugins: PHP, Python, Haskell, fonts, SugarActivity, Java, R, Perl, Ocaml Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/foot
FEDORA-2021-11bc4b77a6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-11bc4b77a6
FEDORA-2021-05ff515f88 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-05ff515f88
FEDORA-2021-11bc4b77a6 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-11bc4b77a6 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-11bc4b77a6 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-05ff515f88 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-05ff515f88 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-05ff515f88 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-05ff515f88 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2021-11bc4b77a6 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.