Bug 1913737 - Review Request: playonlinux - Graphical front-end for Wine
Summary: Review Request: playonlinux - Graphical front-end for Wine
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Raphael Groner
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1744725 1913757
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-01-07 13:47 UTC by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2021-03-24 03:03 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-03-07 13:53:00 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
projects.rg: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Robert Scheck 2021-01-07 13:47:23 UTC
Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/playonlinux.spec
SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/playonlinux-4.4-1.src.rpm
Description: New users can often find Wine to be intimidating and difficult to use.
PlayOnLinux is a graphical front-end for Wine which allows to easily install and use numerous games and applications designed to run with Microsoft Windows.
PlayOnLinux has the database of Windows applications from which the user can install desired application with a few clicks. It will automatically setup the Wine prefix and download any required Windows libraries.
Fedora Account System Username: robert

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2021-01-07 13:53:57 UTC
To hopefully ease the package re-review (there are not many differences between the last version in Fedora and this new package) a bit:

 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/playonlinux/blob/6dbaaf6c6be94b2b75d48ee36deac7142ae0e676/f/playonlinux.spec
 - https://github.com/PlayOnLinux/POL-POM-4/compare/4.3.4...4.4

PlayOnLinux was removed from Fedora in August 2019 because of the lack of Python 3 support, see also bug #1738050 comment #1 for details.

Comment 2 Jiri Konecny 2021-01-09 21:59:03 UTC
Hi Robert,

I see that you are adding new blocker bugs for this bug but as I see they are required only for EPEL 8 so I guess this is not blocking review for Fedora. Am I correct?

Comment 3 Jiri Konecny 2021-01-09 22:08:36 UTC
Also when I'm trying to download source rpm file I'm getting this instead of file.

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<html><head>
<title>403 Forbidden</title>
</head><body>
<h1>Forbidden</h1>
<p>You don't have permission to access /bugzilla/playonlinux-4.4-1.src.rpm
on this server.</p>
<hr>
<address>Apache/2.2.29 (RSC Linux) Server at labs.linuxnetz.de Port 80</address>
</body></html>


Could you please fix the link?

Comment 4 Robert Scheck 2021-01-10 09:07:50 UTC
(In reply to Jiri Konecny from comment #2)
> Am I correct?

Yes, correct. They are only needed for EPEL 8.


(In reply to Jiri Konecny from comment #3)
> Could you please fix the link?

Sorry, done.

Comment 5 Raphael Groner 2021-03-03 16:52:02 UTC
Are you interested in a review swap, maybe take a look into bug #1462467 or bug #1877240.

Comment 6 Raphael Groner 2021-03-03 17:49:58 UTC
Please fix link for spec in raw format instead of html.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/playonlinux/raw/6dbaaf6c6be94b2b75d48ee36deac7142ae0e676/f/playonlinux.spec

Comment 7 Raphael Groner 2021-03-03 18:37:36 UTC
Maybe wait for bug #1913757 about landing python3-natsort as required dependency in epel8.
"ERROR: Option --old-chroot has been deprecated. Use --isolation=simple instead."
"No matching package to install: 'python3-natsort'"
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63018430

Though successful scratch build done in rawhide as this review seems file for. Is this request about epel8 only?
Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63018357

My system does not allow me to currently run any fedora-review against rawhide environment. Is it sufficient to have a final success with epel8 build?

Comment 8 Robert Scheck 2021-03-03 18:56:18 UTC
The playonlinux package is intended for Fedora and EPEL, while python3-natsort is only an issue for EPEL 8.

Comment 9 Raphael Groner 2021-03-03 19:41:44 UTC
Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63021594

GPL (v2 or later)
-----------------
POL-POM-4-4.4/python/configurewindow/ConfigureWindow.py
POL-POM-4-4.4/python/debug.py
POL-POM-4-4.4/python/install/InstallWindow.py
POL-POM-4-4.4/python/mainwindow.py
POL-POM-4-4.4/python/options.py
POL-POM-4-4.4/python/setupwindow/POL_SetupFrame.py
POL-POM-4-4.4/python/setupwindow/gui_server.py
POL-POM-4-4.4/python/wine_versions/WineVersionsWindow.py
POL-POM-4-4.4/python/wrapper.py

MIT/X11 (BSD like)
------------------
POL-POM-4-4.4/src/check_direct_rendering.c

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
=> Licenses GPLv2 and MIT/X11 (latter one file only)

[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or
     generated". 17 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/builder/fedora-
     review/1913737-playonlinux/playonlinux/licensecheck.txt
=> Add MIT for special file listed above or explain exception.

[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/appdata
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
     Note: Using prebuilt rpms.
=> Verified by succesful scratch build in rawhide.

[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
=> License fix needed.

[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
     desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: Mock build failed
     See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.


Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 2.9 starting (python version = 3.6.8, NVR = mock-2.9-1.el7)...
Start(bootstrap): init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish(bootstrap): init plugins
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
INFO: Signal handler active
Start: run
Start(bootstrap): chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata
Finish(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 2.9
INFO: Mock Version: 2.9
Finish(bootstrap): chroot init
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start: cleaning package manager metadata
Finish: cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 2.9
INFO: Mock Version: 2.9
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s): /builddir/playonlinux-4.4-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M f206b85a84fe47f6afef95951e832e06 -D /var/lib/mock/epel-7-x86_64-bootstrap/root --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.jqzsy6yk:/etc/resolv.conf --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/epel-7-x86_64/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin --setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007" --setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$  --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/epel-7-x86_64/root/ --releasever 7 install /builddir/playonlinux-4.4-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts



Rpmlint
-------
Checking: playonlinux-4.4-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
          playonlinux-4.4-1.src.rpm
playonlinux.x86_64: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed /usr/libexec/playonlinux-check_dd readelf: /tmp/rpmlint.playonlinux-4.4-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm.rZ3H6M/usr/libexec/playonlinux-check_dd: Error: No such file
playonlinux.x86_64: W: binaryinfo-tail-failed /usr/libexec/playonlinux-check_dd: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/tmp/rpmlint.playonlinux-4.4-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm.rZ3H6M/usr/libexec/playonlinux-check_dd'
playonlinux.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/setupwindow/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/wine_versions/__pycache__/WineVersionsTools.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/configurewindow/__pycache__/PackageList.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/wine_versions/__pycache__/WineVersionsNotebook.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/ui/__pycache__/PlayOnLinuxWindow.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/__pycache__/debug.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/setupwindow/__pycache__/gui_server.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/setupwindow/__pycache__/POL_SetupFrame.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/configurewindow/__pycache__/ConfigureWindow.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/lib/__pycache__/playonlinux.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/install/__pycache__/InstallWindow.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/install/__pycache__/DescriptionFetcher.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/configurewindow/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/install/__pycache__/MiniatureWindow.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/__pycache__/options.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/configurewindow/__pycache__/ConfigureWindowNotebook.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/wine_versions/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/install/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/__pycache__/mainwindow.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/__pycache__/wrapper.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/__pycache__/check_python.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/lib/__pycache__/Variables.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/lib/__pycache__/wine.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/lib/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id
playonlinux.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/wine_versions/__pycache__/WineVersionsFetcher.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/lib/__pycache__/dpiFetcher.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/wine_versions/__pycache__/WineVersionsWindow.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/setupwindow/__pycache__/Downloader.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/ui/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/share/playonlinux/python/lib/__pycache__/lng.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc
playonlinux.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/PlayOnLinux.desktop
playonlinux.x86_64: E: non-utf8-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/PlayOnLinux.desktop
0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 35 warnings.




Requires
--------
playonlinux (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/bash
    /usr/bin/python3
    ImageMagick
    cabextract
    curl
    gettext
    gnupg2
    icoutils
    jq
    libGL.so.1()(64bit)
    libX11.so.6()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    nc
    p7zip-plugins
    python3
    python3-natsort
    python3-wxpython4
    rtld(GNU_HASH)
    tar
    unzip
    wget
    wine
    xterm



Provides
--------
playonlinux:
    application()
    application(PlayOnLinux.desktop)
    metainfo()
    metainfo(PlayOnLinux.appdata.xml)
    playonlinux
    playonlinux(x86-64)



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/PlayOnLinux/POL-POM-4/archive/4.4/POL-POM-4-4.4.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : a3536243772002d17b9c5fcfd616844134bcfe126ce7b7b24eb971ba1f63365d
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a3536243772002d17b9c5fcfd616844134bcfe126ce7b7b24eb971ba1f63365d


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.3 (bcf15e3) last change: 2015-05-04
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --prebuilt --rpm-spec -n playonlinux-4.4-1
Buildroot used: epel-7-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

Comment 11 Raphael Groner 2021-03-04 10:38:29 UTC
ok, approved. Thanks for your fixes and general effort to bring back this useful package.

Comment 12 Raphael Groner 2021-03-04 10:40:36 UTC
while importing please consider to build as well for F33 as the current stable branch to be considered at least.

Comment 13 Robert Scheck 2021-03-04 11:17:53 UTC
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #12)
> while importing please consider to build as well for F33 as the current stable branch to be considered at least.

Thank you for the review. And yes, all active Fedora branches and EPEL 8 are my target.

For now, I've filed ttps://pagure.io/releng/issue/10050 to get the package unretired first.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2021-03-05 22:07:47 UTC
FEDORA-2021-eb97e2d980 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-eb97e2d980

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2021-03-05 22:07:48 UTC
FEDORA-2021-0ef65ec1f9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0ef65ec1f9

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2021-03-06 19:46:31 UTC
FEDORA-2021-524d233b97 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-524d233b97 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-524d233b97

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2021-03-07 13:53:00 UTC
FEDORA-2021-eb97e2d980 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 18 Fedora Update System 2021-03-07 14:30:21 UTC
FEDORA-2021-0ef65ec1f9 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-0ef65ec1f9 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0ef65ec1f9

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 19 Fedora Update System 2021-03-08 00:19:21 UTC
FEDORA-2021-0ef65ec1f9 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 20 Fedora Update System 2021-03-08 20:28:22 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-450431ab2b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-450431ab2b

Comment 21 Fedora Update System 2021-03-10 00:49:51 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-450431ab2b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-450431ab2b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 22 Fedora Update System 2021-03-19 20:06:41 UTC
FEDORA-2021-524d233b97 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 23 Fedora Update System 2021-03-24 03:03:26 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-450431ab2b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.