Please branch and build awscli2 in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain awscli2 in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/awscli2/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: salimma); please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/awscli2/adduser
Missing dependencies: { "awscli2": { "build": { "python-awscrt": [ "python3dist(awscrt) >= 0.12.4" ], "python-flit-core": [ "python3dist(flit-core) >= 3.7.1" ], "python-ruamel-yaml-clib": [ "python3dist(ruamel-yaml-clib) >= 0.2" ] } }, "python-awscrt": { "build": {} }, "python-flit-core": { "build": {} }, "python-ruamel-yaml-clib": { "build": {} } }
We are targeting support in RHEL 9 packages. If this doesn't make it in there, then we'll build it in EPEL.
David: Are you working through this with Nikola?
@mhayden I am. I'll give you more detail as it comes together. There are some upstream discussions still ongoing. I suppose it wouldn't hurt to branch and build for epel9 in the short term if the demand is high enough.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 39 development cycle. Changing version to 39.
Will you be able to branch and build awscli2 in epel9? I would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9 (FAS: salimma). Please also add epel-packagers-sig.
Actively working on this for RHEL 9. 😉
Almost done with this in RHEL 9. Only one package remains.
Thank you Major!