Bug 2308057 - Review Request: golang-github-gotk3 - Go bindings for GTK3
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-gotk3 - Go bindings for GTK3
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jonathan Steffan
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2308058 2308060 2308061 2308062
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-08-26 22:50 UTC by Neal Gompa
Modified: 2024-08-27 10:49 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-08-27 10:43:44 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
jonathansteffan: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7946171 to 7946219 (324 bytes, patch)
2024-08-26 23:23 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Neal Gompa 2024-08-26 22:50:13 UTC
Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-gotk3.spec
SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-gotk3-0.6.4.1-1.fc40.src.rpm

Description:
Go bindings for GTK3

Fedora Account System Username: ngompa

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-08-26 22:57:02 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7946171
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2308057-golang-github-gotk3/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07946171-golang-github-gotk3/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2024-08-26 23:16:49 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2024-08-26 23:23:41 UTC
Created attachment 2044921 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7946171 to 7946219

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2024-08-26 23:23:43 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7946219
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2308057-golang-github-gotk3/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07946219-golang-github-gotk3/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Jonathan Steffan 2024-08-27 02:01:03 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
     found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
     /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10317 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: golang-github-gotk3-devel-0.6.4.1-1.fc42.noarch.rpm
          golang-github-gotk3-0.6.4.1-1.fc42.src.rpm
=============================================== rpmlint session starts ===============================================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpbgu4r_fa')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

golang-github-gotk3-devel.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gotk3/gotk3/pango/pangocairo.go.h
golang-github-gotk3-devel.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/golang-github-gotk3-devel/README.md
golang-github-gotk3.spec: W: no-%build-section
golang-github-gotk3-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gotk3/gotk3/.goipath
========== 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings, 7 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 0.3 s ==========




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1

golang-github-gotk3-devel.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gotk3/gotk3/pango/pangocairo.go.h
golang-github-gotk3-devel.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/golang-github-gotk3-devel/README.md
golang-github-gotk3-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gotk3/gotk3/.goipath
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings, 3 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 0.1 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/gotk3/gotk3/archive/v0.6.4.1/gotk3-0.6.4.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 04f550b066d798ffa490a9c8025e7d1b4cb5c2564d60a98b22e6d719baad004e
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 04f550b066d798ffa490a9c8025e7d1b4cb5c2564d60a98b22e6d719baad004e


Requires
--------
golang-github-gotk3-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    go-filesystem
    pkgconfig(cairo)
    pkgconfig(cairo-gobject)
    pkgconfig(gdk-3.0)
    pkgconfig(gio-2.0)
    pkgconfig(glib-2.0)
    pkgconfig(gobject-2.0)
    pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0)
    pkgconfig(pango)



Provides
--------
golang-github-gotk3-devel:
    golang(github.com/gotk3/gotk3/cairo)
    golang(github.com/gotk3/gotk3/gdk)
    golang(github.com/gotk3/gotk3/gio)
    golang(github.com/gotk3/gotk3/glib)
    golang(github.com/gotk3/gotk3/gtk)
    golang(github.com/gotk3/gotk3/internal/callback)
    golang(github.com/gotk3/gotk3/internal/closure)
    golang(github.com/gotk3/gotk3/internal/slab)
    golang(github.com/gotk3/gotk3/pango)
    golang-github-gotk3-devel
    golang-ipath(github.com/gotk3/gotk3)



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -r -n golang-github-gotk3-0.6.4.1-1.fc40.src.rpm
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: C/C++, Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Java, fonts, R, Perl, PHP, Haskell, SugarActivity, Python, Ocaml
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 6 Jonathan Steffan 2024-08-27 02:05:37 UTC
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
     /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com

This looks to be normal. I just wanted to check.

[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.

With the lower resolution requires for go packages, should we add these BRs versions?:

GTK 3 (3.12 and later)
GDK 3 (3.12 and later)
GLib 2 (2.36 and later)
Cairo (1.10 and later)


golang-github-gotk3-devel.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gotk3/gotk3/pango/pangocairo.go.h

Not sure what to do here.

golang-github-gotk3-devel.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/golang-github-gotk3-devel/README.md

Run dos2unix and preserve timestamps.

golang-github-gotk3.spec: W: no-%build-section

I've not seen this one before. Is what it's looking for hidden in a macro?

golang-github-gotk3-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gotk3/gotk3/.goipath

Does this need to be included for go packages?

Comment 7 Neal Gompa 2024-08-27 02:36:20 UTC
(In reply to Jonathan Steffan from comment #6)
> [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
>      Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
>      /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com
> 
> This looks to be normal. I just wanted to check.
> 
> [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
> 
> With the lower resolution requires for go packages, should we add these BRs
> versions?:
> 
> GTK 3 (3.12 and later)
> GDK 3 (3.12 and later)
> GLib 2 (2.36 and later)
> Cairo (1.10 and later)
> 
> 

It is impossible to reach that low in any supported Fedora/RHEL version, so I don't think so.

> golang-github-gotk3-devel.noarch: E: zero-length
> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gotk3/gotk3/pango/pangocairo.go.h
> 
> Not sure what to do here.
> 

Ignore it. I'm pretty sure this is a thing with Go generated header files.

> golang-github-gotk3-devel.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
> /usr/share/doc/golang-github-gotk3-devel/README.md
> 
> Run dos2unix and preserve timestamps.
> 

I can do that on import.

> golang-github-gotk3.spec: W: no-%build-section
> 
> I've not seen this one before. Is what it's looking for hidden in a macro?
> 

Yes.

> golang-github-gotk3-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gotk3/gotk3/.goipath
> 
> Does this need to be included for go packages?

It's made by the go2rpm machinery, so probably yes.

Comment 8 Jonathan Steffan 2024-08-27 02:42:54 UTC
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #7)
> > golang-github-gotk3-devel.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
> > /usr/share/doc/golang-github-gotk3-devel/README.md
> > 
> > Run dos2unix and preserve timestamps.
> > 
> 
> I can do that on import.

After resolving this, APPROVED.

Comment 9 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-08-27 02:52:35 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-gotk3

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2024-08-27 10:41:23 UTC
FEDORA-2024-96ae1acc7e (golang-github-gotk3-0.6.4.1-1.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-96ae1acc7e

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2024-08-27 10:43:44 UTC
FEDORA-2024-96ae1acc7e (golang-github-gotk3-0.6.4.1-1.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2024-08-27 10:45:27 UTC
FEDORA-2024-81f4904e1f (golang-github-gotk3-0.6.4.1-1.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-81f4904e1f

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2024-08-27 10:49:44 UTC
FEDORA-2024-81f4904e1f (golang-github-gotk3-0.6.4.1-1.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.