Bug 2332593 - requests for xcb-util-errors
Summary: requests for xcb-util-errors
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: xcb-util-errors
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Aleksei Bavshin
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2332393
Blocks: 2330092
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-12-16 16:02 UTC by Troy Dawson
Modified: 2025-02-17 01:03 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: xcb-util-errors-1.0.1-2.el10_0
Clone Of: 2332393
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-02-17 01:03:57 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Troy Dawson 2024-12-16 16:02:31 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2332393 +++

I filed a request for labwc at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2330092

Troy Dawson said that libdrm and xcb-util-errors would be needed to build wlroots, a needed component, and that requests for these two would have to be opened seperately. So, this is the request for said packages. I am hoping that I can request both on the same ticket, rather than opening a separate ticket for each.

The original request is for labwc, and as RHEL10 will be Wayland only, at present there seem to be almost no alternatives to full blown desktop environments. Many people besides myself prefer a more minimalist window manager instead of Gnome or KDE, so it would be nice to have labwc as an alternative.
I selected Rawhide as version following the steps at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/ though I'm not sure if that would be correct.

Reproducible: Always

--- Additional comment from Scott Robbins on 2024-12-14 18:12:53 UTC ---

As this is really to be able to wlroot, I'll file a 3rd request for that as well, with links to the other two (this one and labwc). Hopefully, this is the best way to go about it. I see I should have picked Fedora-EPEL instead of Fedora for the product, for which I apologize and it also means that choosing rawhide was another error as I see that if I choose epel, I'm offered RHEL-9 or 10.
I've requested wlroots at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2332405

Comment 1 Fedora Update System 2025-02-08 04:38:36 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-94ca253d99 (libliftoff-0.5.0-1.el10_0, seatd-0.9.1-1.el10_0, and 2 more) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-94ca253d99

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2025-02-09 02:00:10 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-94ca253d99 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-94ca253d99

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2025-02-17 01:03:57 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-94ca253d99 (libliftoff-0.5.0-1.el10_0, seatd-0.9.1-1.el10_0, and 2 more) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.