Bug 2369465 - [8.0z backport] Upgrade is broken due to changed type of nodeid and ceph uuid logic
Summary: [8.0z backport] Upgrade is broken due to changed type of nodeid and ceph uuid...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: NFS-Ganesha
Version: 8.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
: 8.0z5
Assignee: Sachin Punadikar
QA Contact: hacharya
Rivka Pollack
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2369127 2369533 2369746 2369820
Blocks: 2369129 2369412
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-05-30 17:44 UTC by Justin Caratzas
Modified: 2025-06-09 14:17 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: nfs-ganesha-6.5-12.3.el9cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Upgrades are no longer disruptive Previously, due to various changes for Ganesha in 8.0z3 for node ID type and multiple Ganesha instances, the upgrade was disruptive and resulted in extensive down times. With this fix, the code now works with both numeric and string nodes. No changes to the node ID are required. As a result, there is no need for down time during upgrades and upgrades work as expected.
Clone Of: 2369127
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-06-09 14:16:57 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-11506 0 None None None 2025-05-30 17:48:11 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2025:8694 0 None None None 2025-06-09 14:17:07 UTC

Description Justin Caratzas 2025-05-30 17:44:43 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2369127 +++
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2025-06-09 14:16:57 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.0 bug fix updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:8694
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.