Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 product line. The current stable release is 5.10. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 250360

Summary: description in ksh's manpage about subscript of index array is wrong
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: chuli <chul>
Component: kshAssignee: Tomas Smetana <tsmetana>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-08-03 06:15:44 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
the patch for ksh manpage none

Description chuli 2007-08-01 02:58:44 UTC 
Description of problem:
The description in ksh's manpage about subscript of index array is wrong.
It says that "The value of all subscripts must be in the range of 0 through 
4095."
In fact, the subscript reach to 16777215.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ksh-20060214-1.4

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.man ksh
  
Actual results:
"The value of all subscripts must be in the range of 0 through 4095." will be 
outputed.

Expected results:
"The value of all subscripts must be in the range of 0 through 16777215." will 
be outputed.
Comment 1 chuli 2007-08-01 02:58:44 UTC 
Created attachment 160390 [details]
the patch for ksh manpage
Comment 2 Tomas Smetana 2007-08-01 11:09:25 UTC 
*** Bug 250356 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Tomas Smetana 2007-08-01 11:09:52 UTC 
*** Bug 250359 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Tomas Smetana 2007-08-03 06:15:44 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 250362 ***