Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Spec URL: https://luk1337.fedorapeople.org/review/rubygem-yalphabetize.spec SRPM URL: https://luk1337.fedorapeople.org/review/rubygem-yalphabetize-0.13.0-1.fc46.src.rpm Description: Alphabetize your YAML files Fedora Account System Username: luk1337
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 61 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/asn/workspace/pkg/fedora/REVIEW/2526474-rubygem- yalphabetize/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [-]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: When checking ruby code, install the ruby plugin. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). See: (this test has no URL) [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Checking: rubygem-yalphabetize-0.13.0-1.fc46.noarch.rpm rubygem-yalphabetize-doc-0.13.0-1.fc46.noarch.rpm rubygem-yalphabetize-0.13.0-1.fc46.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmphdykqr9a')] checks: 32, packages: 3 rubygem-yalphabetize.noarch: E: spelling-error ('formatter', '%description -l en_US formatter -> formatted, for matter, for-matter') rubygem-yalphabetize.src: E: spelling-error ('formatter', '%description -l en_US formatter -> formatted, for matter, for-matter') rubygem-yalphabetize.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary yalphabetize rubygem-yalphabetize.noarch: W: no-documentation rubygem-yalphabetize.spec: W: invalid-url Source1: yalphabetize-0.13.0-tests.tar.gz 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings, 12 filtered, 2 badness; has taken 0.2 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.10.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.15/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 33, packages: 2 rubygem-yalphabetize.noarch: E: spelling-error ('formatter', '%description -l en_US formatter -> formatted, for matter, for-matter') rubygem-yalphabetize.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary yalphabetize rubygem-yalphabetize.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings, 8 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 0.1 s Source checksums ---------------- https://rubygems.org/gems/yalphabetize-0.13.0.gem : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : a5a8a3ad3bf822d02814be15277ae50ece0129f18acba2aa5d1290be82cfd3ac CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a5a8a3ad3bf822d02814be15277ae50ece0129f18acba2aa5d1290be82cfd3ac https://raw.githubusercontent.com/samrjenkins/yalphabetize/refs/tags/v0.13.0/LICENSE : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : f903016ccd6b3427b52b13bcedcdd1cfff71764cb90c101920c3ffac0359e51f CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : f903016ccd6b3427b52b13bcedcdd1cfff71764cb90c101920c3ffac0359e51f Requires -------- rubygem-yalphabetize (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/ruby ruby(rubygems) rubygem(psych-comments) rubygem-yalphabetize-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): rubygem-yalphabetize Provides -------- rubygem-yalphabetize: rubygem(yalphabetize) rubygem-yalphabetize rubygem-yalphabetize-doc: rubygem-yalphabetize-doc Diff spec file in url and in SRPM --------------------------------- --- /home/asn/workspace/pkg/fedora/REVIEW/2526474-rubygem-yalphabetize/srpm/rubygem-yalphabetize.spec 2026-09-10 18:45:07.989125854 +0200 +++ /home/asn/workspace/pkg/fedora/REVIEW/2526474-rubygem-yalphabetize/srpm-unpacked/rubygem-yalphabetize.spec 2026-09-10 02:00:00.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,2 +1,12 @@ +## START: Set by rpmautospec +## (rpmautospec version 0.8.4) +## RPMAUTOSPEC: autorelease, autochangelog +%define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua: + release_number = 1; + base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}")); + print(release_number + base_release_number - 1); +}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{!?-n:%{?dist}} +## END: Set by rpmautospec + # Generated from yalphabetize-0.13.0.gem by gem2rpm -*- rpm-spec -*- %global gem_name yalphabetize @@ -85,3 +95,6 @@ %changelog -%autochangelog +## START: Generated by rpmautospec +* Thu Sep 10 2026 LuK1337 <priv.luk> - 0.13.0-1 +- Initial import into Fedora (#2526474) +## END: Generated by rpmautospec
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-yalphabetize Monitoring: Wasn't able to create project in Anitya. You can create it manually on: `https://release-monitoring.org`