Bug 27003
| Summary: | Sun's Java 2 1.3 broken | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks> |
| Component: | glibc | Assignee: | Michael Fulbright <msf> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 7.1 | CC: | a.gargantini, fweimer, lnxwolf, ooman, scfitch |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2001-02-27 02:00:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Gerald Henriksen
2001-02-11 01:46:24 UTC
Assigning to glibc, but it looks very likely that your ld.so.conf is screwed up. I have had the same problem. I linked /bin/cut as /usr/bin/cut and the error message disappeared, but java does not work yet. a.gargantini We (Red Hat) should really try to resolve this before next release. I have determined that this has something to do with glibc-2.2.1-3.i686: When I forced the installation of glibc-2.2.1-3.i386.rpm, java started to "work". Threads do NOT behave like threads, though (basically, there's no threading). java -version reports: java version "1.3.0" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.0) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.0, mixed mode) The use of glibc-2.2.1-3.i686.rpm does work for Java SDK, version 1.3.0, when using the (now obsolete) Classic VM (green-threads, no jit). NOTE: This is the motherboard/processor I am running: ASUS A7V (no audio) motherboard Athlon Thunderbird Socket-A processor, 850MHz 128MB SDRAM (PC-133) IBM Deskstar G30X 30GB HDD (ATA-100) I hope this helps... The reason is (probably) the use of an assumption that the thread stack space is 2 MB. This is a duplicate of something... searching. *** Bug 27436 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |