Bug 430082 - Please rebuild asterisk for EPEL 4 and 5
Please rebuild asterisk for EPEL 4 and 5
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: asterisk (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
low Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeffrey C. Ollie
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On: 430080 430081
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-01-24 08:59 EST by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2008-02-13 14:11 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-02-13 13:20:51 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Robert Scheck 2008-01-24 08:59:08 EST
Description of problem:
Please rebuild asterisk for EPEL 4 and 5

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
asterisk-1.4.17-1

Actual results:
No asterisk in EPEL 4 and 5

Expected results:
Package asterisk in EPEL 4 and 5

Additional info:
Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package 
there.
Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2008-01-24 09:00:18 EST
I filed bug reports for all unsatisfied dependencies. Hopefully, I didn't 
forget anything - otherwise please correct.
Comment 2 Jeffrey C. Ollie 2008-01-24 13:56:56 EST
I have no interest at all in maintaining Asterisk for EPEL 4 as I have no RHEL 4
systems.  If the Speex issue can be resolved I will be maintaining Asterisk for
EPEL 5.  For the time being I'm maintaining a private repository for Asterisk here:

http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/epel/5/
Comment 3 Jeffrey C. Ollie 2008-02-13 13:20:51 EST
Closing this as it seems the speex issue won't be resolved before RHEL6.
Comment 4 Robert Scheck 2008-02-13 13:50:34 EST
Can't we ship a private/internal speex up2date enough inside of asterisk 
package?
Comment 5 Jeffrey C. Ollie 2008-02-13 14:11:38 EST
(In reply to comment #4)
> Can't we ship a private/internal speex up2date enough inside of asterisk 
> package?

No, EPEL policy prohibits that sort of behavior.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.