Bug 455762 - RHEL4 U6: usb test never planned
RHEL4 U6: usb test never planned
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Hardware Certification Program
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Test Suite (tests) (Show other bugs)
5
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: YangKun
Lawrence Lim
:
: 451867 458478 468076 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-07-17 12:49 EDT by Greg Nichols
Modified: 2014-03-25 20:55 EDT (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: hts-5.2-19
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-11-12 14:24:49 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Greg Nichols 2008-07-17 12:49:43 EDT
Description of problem:

The USB test is never planned for RHEL4 U6,

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

HTS 5.2 R19
Comment 1 YangKun 2008-08-05 04:28:47 EDT
(In reply to comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> 
> The USB test is never planned for RHEL4 U6,
> 
> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
> 
> HTS 5.2 R19

fixed on 2008.08.05 . 

-YK
Comment 3 Jeremy West 2008-08-07 11:12:44 EDT
*** Bug 451867 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Jeremy West 2008-08-07 11:17:01 EDT
Do we have an ETA on what release of HTS this new patch will be available in?

--jwest
Comment 6 YangKun 2008-08-11 20:49:26 EDT
*** Bug 458478 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Nicole Dai 2008-10-13 03:10:19 EDT
Verified usb test was listed in /var/hts/plan.xml after executed `hts plan` with hts-5.2-20.el4 on RHEL4U6.
Comment 12 YangKun 2008-10-22 22:10:33 EDT
*** Bug 468076 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 IBM Bug Proxy 2008-10-24 08:41:03 EDT
test. please ignore.
HTS-5.2-16 doesn't recognize USB ports of the system.

HTS-5.2-20 fixed the above problems. But RedHat said HTS-5.2-20 is not an
official version. So they didn't accept the test results that I submitted, and
tell I have to use HTS-5.2-16.

lspci shows there are USB ports:

[root@chevy01 hts]# lspci
00:02.0 PCI bridge: IBM EADS-X PCI-X to PCI-X Bridge (rev 03)
00:02.4 PCI bridge: IBM EADS-X PCI-X to PCI-X Bridge (rev 03)
c0:01.0 RAID bus controller: IBM Obsidian chipset SCSI controller (rev 01)
d0:01.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43)
d0:01.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43)
d0:01.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 04)
0001:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit Ethernet
Controller (rev 06)
0001:01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit Ethernet
Controller (rev 06)
[root@chevy01 hts]#

"hts print " shows no USB:

and contents of config.xml and plan.xml:

[root@chevy01 hts]# hts print

Test Plan:
----------------------------------------------------------------
cdrom      scd0
network    eth1
network    eth0
memory
core
storage    sda
storage    sdb
storage    sdc
info
-----------
[root@chevy01 hts]# cat config.xml
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<certification-test discover-time='2008-10-18 00:07:58' hts-release='16'
hts-version='5.2'>
<hardware>
<arch>ppc64</arch>
<model>Power 570 Server (9117-MMA)</model>
<vendor>IBM</vendor>
<make/>
</hardware>
<certification>
<os>
<name>Nahant Update 5</name>
<release>4</release>
</os>
</certification>
</certification-test>
-----------
[root@chevy01 hts]# cat plan.xml
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<certification-test discover-time='2008-10-18 00:07:58' plan-time='2008-10-18
00:07:59' hts-release='16' hts-version='5.2'>
<hardware>
<arch>ppc64</arch>
<model>Power 570 Server (9117-MMA)</model>
<vendor>IBM</vendor>
<make/>
</hardware>
<certification>
<os>
<name>Nahant Update 5</name>
<release>4</release>
</os>
</certification>
<test name='cdrom' label='' logical-device='scd0' device-class='CDROM'
device-bus='SCSI' udi='' interactive='yes'/>
<test name='network' label='' logical-device='eth1' device-class='NETWORK'
device-bus='PCI' udi='' interactive='no'/>
<test name='network' label='' logical-device='eth0' device-class='NETWORK'
device-bus='PCI' udi='' interactive='no'/>
<test name='memory' label='' logical-device='' device-class='MEMORY'
device-bus='' udi='' interactive='no'/>
<test name='core' label='' logical-device='' device-class='CPU' device-bus=''
udi='' interactive='no'/>
<test name='storage' label='' logical-device='sda' device-class='STORAGE'
device-bus='SCSI' udi='' interactive='no'/>
<test name='storage' label='' logical-device='sdb' device-class='STORAGE'
device-bus='SCSI' udi='' interactive='no'/>
<test name='storage' label='' logical-device='sdc' device-class='STORAGE'
device-bus='SCSI' udi='' interactive='no'/>
<test name='info' label='' logical-device='' device-class='ALL' device-bus=''
udi='' interactive='no'/>
</certification-test>
----------------


Your operating system is RHEL4 --> "Nahant Update 5" .

"hts-5.2-16 can not add the USB test on RHEL4" is a known bug and was already fixed, please refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455762

This issue only applies to RHEL4. Meaning only the "RHEL4 USB testing" should utilize hts-5.2-20.

hts-5.2-16 can plan the USB test correctly on RHEL5. Since hts-5.2-20 is a preview release, so all USB testing on RHEL5 should be done with hts-5.2-16 .

closing this bug as duplicate with bug#455762

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 455762 ***
Comment 14 IBM Bug Proxy 2008-10-27 12:21:02 EDT
Since this bug has been addressed in version hts-5.2-20.el4 with the patch, RedHat and HIen have all confirmed it is indeed fixed on hts-5.2-20.el4, I will close this bug now.  Thanks everyone!
Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2008-11-12 14:24:49 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0919.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.