Let's use this bug as a tracker for getting all of the DTP features built. We can make it depend upon bugs for reviews of dependencies or modifications needed to dependencies.
*** Bug 486364 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
This is tracker bug for building all DTP features. Let's keep it in rawhide.
(In reply to comment #4) > This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 > development cycle. > Changing version to '11'. > > More information and reason for this action is here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping You've already done this once and we changed it back to rawhide because it still applies. Can we leave it in rawhide, please?
I've got an update to eclipse-dtp that builds all the features except for the SDK and documentation ready to go as soon as the LPG package is approved. See bug #497756, comment 21.
(In reply to comment #6) > I've got an update to eclipse-dtp that builds all the features except for the > SDK and documentation ready to go as soon as the LPG package is approved. This will be appearing in Rawhide shortly: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1475396 If nobody's bothered about an SDK sub-package, this bug could be closed.
I think we can forget an SDK sub-package unless some need arises.
(In reply to comment #8) > I think we can forget an SDK sub-package unless some need arises. Coolio. Let's close this then.