Bug 587437 - [abrt] crash in xchat-gnome-0.26.1-10.fc13: Process /usr/bin/xchat-gnome was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] crash in xchat-gnome-0.26.1-10.fc13: Process /usr/bin/xchat-gnome was ...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 658194
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: xchat-gnome   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 13
Hardware: x86_64 Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Brian Pepple
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:c76b65af9555974e5bc29a3afa1...
: 624137 628075 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2010-04-29 22:04 UTC by Javier Alejandro Castro
Modified: 2011-04-13 04:49 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2011-04-13 04:49:13 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (19.27 KB, text/plain)
2010-04-29 22:04 UTC, Javier Alejandro Castro
no flags Details

Description Javier Alejandro Castro 2010-04-29 22:04:21 UTC
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: xchat-gnome
comment: Nothing special
component: xchat-gnome
executable: /usr/bin/xchat-gnome
global_uuid: c76b65af9555974e5bc29a3afa1c9b54861676b4
package: xchat-gnome-0.26.1-10.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/xchat-gnome was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
How to reproduce: 1. Closing xchat-gnome

Comment 1 Javier Alejandro Castro 2010-04-29 22:04:25 UTC
Created attachment 410245 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 16:38:07 UTC
*** Bug 624137 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 16:38:11 UTC
*** Bug 628075 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2011-04-13 04:49:13 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 658194 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.