Bug 640557 - Review Request: smartcardpp - Library for accessing smart cards
Summary: Review Request: smartcardpp - Library for accessing smart cards
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Lemenkov
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 641042
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-10-06 10:35 UTC by Kalev Lember
Modified: 2010-10-17 04:51 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-10-07 07:32:23 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
lemenkov: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Kalev Lember 2010-10-06 10:35:35 UTC
Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/smartcardpp.spec
SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/smartcardpp-0.2.0-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:
smartcardpp is a set of C++ classes to manage smart card
communications and implement basic command primitives.

Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2517334

Comment 1 Peter Lemenkov 2010-10-06 16:10:47 UTC
I'll review it

Comment 2 Peter Lemenkov 2010-10-06 18:19:37 UTC
REVIEW:

Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable

+ rpmlint is silent

Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ~/Desktop/smartcardpp-*
smartcardpp.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary card-test
smartcardpp-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: 

+ The package is named according to the  Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (BSD).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.

Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum smartcardpp-0.2.0.tar.bz2*
d3b0fee245adf5a24a0ff6d78077c26b991fdef083972dc1f245f6e7b4ea2d29  smartcardpp-0.2.0.tar.bz2
d3b0fee245adf5a24a0ff6d78077c26b991fdef083972dc1f245f6e7b4ea2d29  smartcardpp-0.2.0.tar.bz2.1
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: 

+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
+ The package stores shared library files in some of the dynamic linker's default paths, and it calls ldconfig in %post and %postun.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
0 The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application.
+ Header files are stored in a -devel package.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
+ The library file(s) that end in .so (without suffix) is(are) stored in a -devel package.
+ The -devel package requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.

Ok, I didn't find any issues, so this package is

APPROVED.

Comment 3 Kalev Lember 2010-10-06 18:57:33 UTC
Thanks a lot for the very quick review!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: smartcardpp
Short Description: Library for accessing smart cards
Owners: kalev anttix tuju
Branches: f12 f13 f14
InitialCC:

Comment 4 Kevin Fenzi 2010-10-06 23:31:35 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 5 Kalev Lember 2010-10-07 07:32:23 UTC
Builds done, closing the ticket. Thanks!

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2010-10-07 07:34:28 UTC
smartcardpp-0.2.0-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smartcardpp-0.2.0-1.fc13

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2010-10-07 07:34:35 UTC
smartcardpp-0.2.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smartcardpp-0.2.0-1.fc14

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2010-10-07 07:34:41 UTC
smartcardpp-0.2.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smartcardpp-0.2.0-1.fc12

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2010-10-14 06:29:43 UTC
smartcardpp-0.2.0-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2010-10-15 12:44:55 UTC
smartcardpp-0.2.0-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2010-10-17 04:51:44 UTC
smartcardpp-0.2.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.