+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #633696 +++ Created attachment 447192 [details] Patch for solution: there is a missing \n Description of problem: Just a small issue: the man page has some problems with formatting: (When using Expectk, this option is specified as -buffer.)Notethatstdio-bufferingmaystilltakeplacehoweverthisshouldn’tcauseproblemswhenreadingfromafifoorstdin. How reproducible: man expect --- Additional comment from imatusov on 2010-09-14 05:28:34 EDT --- I forgot to mention the issue affects also the package in RHEL6.0 and FC13. --- Additional comment from pm-rhel on 2010-09-14 05:57:01 EDT --- This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. --- Additional comment from pm-rhel on 2011-01-11 14:59:38 EST --- This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. --- Additional comment from pm-rhel on 2011-01-11 17:33:39 EST --- This request was erroneously denied for the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The error has been fixed and this request has been re-proposed for the current release.
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: The expect(1) man page formatting problem has been fixed with this update.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1501.html