Bug 699652 - Document preferred use of TLS_CACERT instead of TLS_CACERTDIR to specify Certificate Authorities
Summary: Document preferred use of TLS_CACERT instead of TLS_CACERTDIR to specify Cert...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openldap
Version: 5.5
Hardware: All
OS: All
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jan Vcelak
QA Contact: Ondrej Moriš
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 609722 649048 811468
Blocks: 590060 668957 719046 731680 749319
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-04-26 09:37 UTC by Ivana Varekova
Modified: 2013-03-04 01:29 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: openldap-2.3.43-20.el5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
The ldap.conf(5) manual page has been modified in order to prefer usage of the TLS_CACERT option instead of the TLS_CACERTDIR option to specify Certificate Authorities.
Clone Of: 649048
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-21 05:28:41 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0155 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE openldap bug fix and enhancement update 2012-02-20 14:54:48 UTC

Comment 3 Jan Vcelak 2011-08-18 17:57:17 UTC 
Resolved in openldap-2.3.43-20.el5
Comment 5 Jan Vcelak 2011-08-26 13:47:53 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
The ldap.conf(5) manual page has been modified in order to prefer usage of the TLS_CACERT option instead of the TLS_CACERTDIR option to specify Certificate Authorities.
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2012-02-21 05:28:41 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0155.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.