Compare bug 706780 with bug 704651
Both filed with abrt, but not marked as duplicates.
Possibly because one was tainted, the other wasn't ?
(if so, ignoring that part of the report would be fine).
I'm going to write some improvements.
Merge: a2c4ca9 8f35082
Author: Nikola Pajkovsky <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Tue May 31 10:35:51 2011 +0200
Merge branch 'oops/btparser'
rhzb#707074 abrt dupe detection needs to ignore some parts of kernel traces
The basic idea is strip out only function from bactrace and take the first 6 function to calculate hash.
btw, a further improvement to the backtrace hashing would be to ignore the functions that are prefixed with a ?
I don't know if you do that already..
I don't ignore those functions. Algorithm just skip that '?' mark. Nevertheless skip unreliable function name from backtrace is not bad idea.
abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
then log in and leave karma (feedback).
abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.