Compare bug 706780 with bug 704651 Both filed with abrt, but not marked as duplicates. Possibly because one was tainted, the other wasn't ? (if so, ignoring that part of the report would be fine).
I'm going to write some improvements.
commit 82c53df6074a4db8f2c5cb4e6b665c2e0881eb28 Merge: a2c4ca9 8f35082 Author: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs> Date: Tue May 31 10:35:51 2011 +0200 Merge branch 'oops/btparser' * oops/btparser: rhzb#707074 abrt dupe detection needs to ignore some parts of kernel traces The basic idea is strip out only function from bactrace and take the first 6 function to calculate hash.
btw, a further improvement to the backtrace hashing would be to ignore the functions that are prefixed with a ? I don't know if you do that already..
I don't ignore those functions. Algorithm just skip that '?' mark. Nevertheless skip unreliable function name from backtrace is not bad idea.
abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15
Package abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.