Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Compare bug 706780 with bug 704651 Both filed with abrt, but not marked as duplicates. Possibly because one was tainted, the other wasn't ? (if so, ignoring that part of the report would be fine).
I'm going to write some improvements.
commit 82c53df6074a4db8f2c5cb4e6b665c2e0881eb28 Merge: a2c4ca9 8f35082 Author: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs> Date: Tue May 31 10:35:51 2011 +0200 Merge branch 'oops/btparser' * oops/btparser: rhzb#707074 abrt dupe detection needs to ignore some parts of kernel traces The basic idea is strip out only function from bactrace and take the first 6 function to calculate hash.
btw, a further improvement to the backtrace hashing would be to ignore the functions that are prefixed with a ? I don't know if you do that already..
I don't ignore those functions. Algorithm just skip that '?' mark. Nevertheless skip unreliable function name from backtrace is not bad idea.
abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15
Package abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
abrt-2.0.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.