Bug 799040 - tog-pegasus should Provide: cim-server to be consistent with sblim-sfcb
Summary: tog-pegasus should Provide: cim-server to be consistent with sblim-sfcb
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: tog-pegasus
Version: 6.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Vitezslav Crhonek
QA Contact: Petr Sklenar
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 799033
Blocks: 799037
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-03-01 16:14 UTC by Perry Myers
Modified: 2012-06-20 14:47 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 799037
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 14:47:32 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0953 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE tog-pegasus bug fix update 2012-06-19 21:12:24 UTC

Description Perry Myers 2012-03-01 16:14:56 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #799037 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #799033 +++

Description of problem:
Right now libvirt-cim specifically Requires: tog-pegasus

But it should probably require something more generic like "cim-server"

In order for this to happen, we'd also need sblim-sfcb and tog-pegasus to add Provides: cim-server to their spec files.

--- Additional comment from pmyers on 2012-03-01 11:05:07 EST ---

Note: tog-pegasus and sblim-sfcb already list Provides: cim-server in their spec files, so looks like just a change to libvirt-cim is all that is needed

--- Additional comment from pmyers on 2012-03-01 11:13:47 EST ---

In RHEL6, sblim-sfcb Provides: cim-server but tog-pegasus does not.  So this bug will need to depend on a RHEL 6 bug for tog-pegasus so that it can add Provides: cim-server to its spec file to be consistent with Fedora
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 14:47:32 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0953.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.