Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-date-cache/ghc-date-cache.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-date-cache/ghc-date-cache-0.3.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Formatting time is slow. This package provides mechanisms to cache formatted date Fedora Account System Username: mathstuf
Anything I can do to move these along? Lakshmi: I'm happy to review if you are busy...
Kevin, I am unable to access the spec file and srpm. I mentioned this to Ben in bug 885348.
Ah indeed. Thanks for the update...
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint -i ghc-date-cache-devel-0.3.0-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm ghc-date-cache-0.3.0-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm ghc-date-cache-0.3.0-1.fc17.src.rpm ../ghc-date-cache.spec ghc-date-cache-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cacher -> cachet, cache, catcher The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-date-cache-devel.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog The latest changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the version that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it. ghc-date-cache.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cacher -> cachet, cache, catcher The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-date-cache.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog The latest changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the version that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it. ghc-date-cache.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cacher -> cachet, cache, catcher The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-date-cache.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog The latest changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the version that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it. ghc-date-cache.src: W: strange-permission date-cache-0.3.0.tar.gz 0640L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. ghc-date-cache.src: W: strange-permission ghc-date-cache.spec 0640L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. Changelog is incorrect. Please correct it before importing the package. [+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes Version-release - Matches License - OK No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package template - OK Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. Build Requires list - OK Summary and description - OK API documentation - OK, in devel package [+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. BSD license. [+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. LICENSE file is included. [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. sha256sum ghc-date-cache-0.3.0-1.fc19.src/date-cache-0.3.0.tar.gz abce44f11dd9da4abaca9e33da2c74bd32b42fea027d171c03b6c10cda62303f ghc-date-cache-0.3.0-1.fc19.src/date-cache-0.3.0.tar.gz sha256sum date-cache-0.3.0.tar.gz abce44f11dd9da4abaca9e33da2c74bd32b42fea027d171c03b6c10cda62303f date-cache-0.3.0.tar.gz [+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on x86_64. [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Checked with rpmquery --list [+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides. [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. [+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release} [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [-]SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Installed the packages. Loaded System.Date.Cache into ghci. Loads fine cabal-rpm-diff is OK. Please correct changelog before importing the package. APPROVED.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-data-cache Short Description: Data cacher Owners: mathstuf Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: haskell-sig
Requested package name ghc-data-cache doesn't match bug summary ghc-date-cache, please fix.
Whoops. That's what I get for trying to tap things out on the phone. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-date-cache Short Description: Date cacher Owners: mathstuf Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: haskell-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests).
ghc-date-cache-0.3.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-date-cache-0.3.0-2.fc17
ghc-date-cache-0.3.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-date-cache-0.3.0-2.fc18
ghc-date-cache-0.3.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.
ghc-date-cache-0.3.0-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
ghc-date-cache-0.3.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.