Bug 896649 - internal error: new archives are not identical
Summary: internal error: new archives are not identical
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: unison240
Version: 19
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Richard W.M. Jones
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 980195 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-01-17 16:52 UTC by Peter Blomgren
Modified: 2013-09-18 19:43 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: unison240-2.40.102-3.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 980195 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-07-20 00:00:47 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
new-hash.patch (6.81 KB, patch)
2013-07-03 10:05 UTC, Richard W.M. Jones
no flags Details | Diff

Description Peter Blomgren 2013-01-17 16:52:27 UTC
Description of problem:

Unison cannot synchronize with remote

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

unison227-2.27.57-19.fc18.i686 (local)
unison227-2.27.57-17.fc17.i686 (remote)

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run unison, tell it OK when it prompts about unavailable archives/new roots
2.
3.
  
Actual results:

Popup:
"Fatal error

Internal error: New archives are not identical.
Retaining original archives.  Please run Unison again to bring them up to date."


Expected results:

prompt to make sync decisions, synchronize


Additional info:

Broke after upgrade from Fedora 17 to Fedora 18

See Bug 892830 for unison240. (same problem: CLOSED ERRATA)

Comment 1 Gregor Tätzner 2013-01-17 17:17:17 UTC
imho this is a good time to retire the old unison-227 package. that version is not maintained by upstream for...how many years?

Alternatively you would need to backport the fix from 2.40.102 that addresses the differences between ocaml 3 and 4.

Comment 2 Andrew McNabb 2013-01-18 00:33:32 UTC
This seems to be related to the following:

http://unix.stackexchange.com/q/52945/12336
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/35407

Comment 3 Daniel Riek 2013-07-01 16:38:01 UTC
The same problem exists when trying to use a remote machine running RHEL and unison227-2.27.57-13.el6.x86_64 from EPEL.

Makes unison on Fedora useless.

Comment 4 Andrew McNabb 2013-07-01 17:46:24 UTC
*** Bug 980195 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Richard W.M. Jones 2013-07-01 21:26:07 UTC
(In reply to Daniel Riek from comment #3)
> The same problem exists when trying to use a remote machine running RHEL and
> unison227-2.27.57-13.el6.x86_64 from EPEL.
> 
> Makes unison on Fedora useless.

There's 0% chance that OCaml on RHEL 6 can be updated, so if
the versions of OCaml are required to be the same, then there's no
way we can fix the bug so Fedora <-> RHEL 6 conversions can work.

Does anyone have a concrete technical link describing the problem?

The nearest I can find is:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/unison-users/message/10456
which describes a "hash function".  Is this Hashtbl.hash?  I
wasn't aware that Hashtbl.hash had ever changed.  OCaml 4 adds
some new and differently named hash functions in Hashtbl, but
I didn't know the existing one had changed.

Comment 6 Gregor Tätzner 2013-07-02 21:00:15 UTC
Maybe this commit from unison 2.40 branch can help you?

r511 | vouillon | 2012-09-17 16:09:03 +0200 (Mon, 17 Sep 2012) | 3 lines

* Use hash function from OCaml 3.x for comparing archives, even when
  compiled with OCaml 4.x

On the other hand I could just provide unison240 for rhel6. Basically that would solve this issue as well if we obsolete unison227.

Comment 7 David Crowe 2013-07-02 21:05:09 UTC
if a unison240 version with the fix were available for rhel6 this issue would be a moot point.  as gregor noted in comment 1 unison227 is obsolete.  unfortunately, we've been stuck with it when one end of our synchronization setup is rhel6.

Comment 8 Richard W.M. Jones 2013-07-03 10:05:38 UTC
Created attachment 768170 [details]
new-hash.patch

So that others don't have to suffer using subversion as well,
I have attached the patch which was mentioned in the comment above.
It's pretty straightforward so could probably be applied to the
unison227 package (although I didn't check that).

I also submitted a request for an EL6 branch for unison240:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531#c26

Comment 9 Richard W.M. Jones 2013-07-03 13:17:54 UTC
On the whole it's probably better to go with a (relatively)
new version of unison, instead of trying to patch the ancient
version.  Therefore I have added unison240 in EPEL 6:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5569267

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2013-07-03 13:23:31 UTC
unison240-2.40.102-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unison240-2.40.102-3.el6

Comment 11 Daniel Riek 2013-07-03 16:20:52 UTC
The setup with the new unison240 for RHEL 6 is working out of the box after updating both machines. Solves my problem.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2013-07-03 20:54:36 UTC
unison240-2.40.102-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.

Comment 13 David Crowe 2013-07-17 15:04:47 UTC
unison240 version from epel-testing is working very well for me.  thanks for the fix.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2013-07-20 00:00:47 UTC
unison240-2.40.102-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.