Description of problem: The instance multiplier logic (for example in the quantity scrollers in the gui) applies to virtual guests when it shouldn't. This is according to the design dock here: https://engineering.redhat.com/trac/Entitlement/wiki/InstanceBasedDesign Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): subscription-manager: 1.8.7-1.git.39.c802238.el5 subscription management server: 0.8.7-1 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run subscription-manager-gui where the fact 'virt.is_guest: True' is set 2. Register to your candlepin 3. Try to adjust the quantity on a subscription that has the instance_multiplier (in the TESTDATA, "Awesome OS Instance Based (Standard Support)" is a good example). Actual results: The instance_multiplier logic is enforced on virtual guests. Expected results: The instance_multiplier logic is not enforced on virtual guests. Additional info:
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release.
Could you please set devel_ack/condnack for 5.10 or postpone/close this bugzilla? Erratas should be filed by May 21st, so development phase is nearing its exit.
Should be fixed as a result of bug #921249. Moving to POST.
Created attachment 759225 [details] instance multiplier does not apply to virtual guests Version: # rpm -qa | egrep "subscription-manager|python-rhsm" subscription-manager-migration-1.8.10-1.git.17.f96cf80.el5 subscription-manager-migration-data-1.11.3.1-1.git.1.78afd75.el5 python-rhsm-1.8.12-1.git.0.d747a65.el5 subscription-manager-1.8.10-1.git.17.f96cf80.el5 subscription-manager-gui-1.8.10-1.git.17.f96cf80.el5 subscription-manager-firstboot-1.8.10-1.git.17.f96cf80.el5 Please see attachment. Instance multiplier does not apply to Virtual guests VERIFIED
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1332.html