Bug 983634
| Summary: | Problem with collaboration of two and more users on the one process definition | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] JBoss BPMS Platform 6 | Reporter: | Sona Mala <smala> |
| Component: | jBPM Designer | Assignee: | Tihomir Surdilovic <tsurdilo> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Sona Mala <smala> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 6.0.0 | CC: | etirelli, kverlaen, paradhya, porcelli, rrajasek, vigoyal |
| Target Milestone: | ER1 | ||
| Target Release: | 6.0.1 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
In the Designer, the last changed user field for a process always defaults to 'admin' irrespective of who made the last change on that process. This causes a conflict dialog to be shown when saving the process irrespective of whether one person has done the modification or two.
Cause:
Consequence:
Fix:
Result:
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-08-06 20:02:15 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 983661, 1049284, 1049290 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 999950 | ||
This issue was partially solved by the following ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999950 In order to fix this at desginer it's necessary to follow email instructions sent to bsig group. OK.. so, can we make sure all major tools follow the steps provided ? Internal Whiteboard: Beta Blocker → Blocker Not critical for Beta, but need to address for GA blocked by another issue. Seems the depending issue is already verified, setting back ON_QA I verified that the dialog which resolves conflicts is shown up and options "Force Save" and "Re-open" work fine. But there is one problem that an user does not know who changes that process. There is still user name "admin" no matter which user has saved the process. Same conflict dialog is shown even if the process is modified by one person. So there is no difference between single user modification and modification by two and more person. the associated issue with admin user save by designer has already been fixed (https://github.com/droolsjbpm/jbpm-designer/commit/157325157707f2fc724ea8f29343a6184c78df00) -- BZ 1049290 This no longer has a target release of 6.0.0. I verify that a conflict dialog contains right user for 6.0.1 ER2 BPMS. (Not just admin user). Now conflict dialog works as was expected: - show correct user - options 'Force Save' and 'Re-open' works properly Unfortunately, one problem still persist but it will be described by another bugzilla issue. |
Description of problem: There is no update mechanism in Designer if collaborate two users on one process definition in the same time. User always rewrite the process by the his local definition. So win the last save. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 6.0.0 DR6 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. both user open process definition 2. user1: create process Start("MyStart") -> User Task("My User") -> End 3. user2: create process Start -> Task -> End 4. user1: save a process 5. user2: save a process 6. user1: delete End and add Task ("AAA") -> End 7. user2: change property "Name" of Task to "BBB" 8. user2: save a process 9. user1: save a process and close Designer 10: user1: open designer Actual results: The user1 can see a different process: Start->Task("BBB")->End Expected results: Some notification about conflict: - merging mechanism - update designer if a process is saved - etc. Additional info: GIT repository log says that commit "Updated asset BPMN2-ConditionalStart.bpmn2" is always done by same user (admin <null>).