Bug 992098 - cross-gcc: FTBFS in rawhide
Summary: cross-gcc: FTBFS in rawhide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: cross-gcc
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Howells
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 992097
Blocks: F20FTBFS 991952 992398 993289 993296
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-05 03:15 UTC by Dennis Gilmore
Modified: 2013-08-13 16:46 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: cross-gcc-4.8.1-5.2
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-08-13 16:46:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dennis Gilmore 2013-08-05 03:15:36 UTC 
Your package cross-gcc failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5704288

Build logs:
root.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4288/5704288/root.log
build.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4288/5704288/build.log
state.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4288/5704288/state.log
NOTE: build logs are cleaned up after 1 week

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild
Comment 1 Cole Robinson 2013-08-05 22:04:25 UTC 
Seems to be documentation related, and only when building on arm. There's been some discussion on fedora devel about doc build issues on arm but not sure if there's a resolution.

FWIW this is blocking builds of cross compiled bios packages seabios, openbios, and SLOF, since noarch packages are getting scheduled for build on ARM quite a bit and our cross-gcc dep isn't available.
Comment 2 Cole Robinson 2013-08-05 22:06:04 UTC 
*** Bug 993289 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Cole Robinson 2013-08-05 22:07:03 UTC 
*** Bug 992398 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Cole Robinson 2013-08-05 22:09:21 UTC 
*** Bug 991952 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Cole Robinson 2013-08-05 22:12:12 UTC 
*** Bug 993296 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Dennis Gilmore 2013-08-08 04:40:52 UTC 
The failure has nothing to do with arm, it fails on x86 as well.
Comment 7 David Howells 2013-08-13 16:46:32 UTC 
Moved to base off of gcc-4.8.1-5
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.