Bug 1097126

Summary: Known issues from 6.2.0 Release Notes not documented in 6.3.0 Release notes
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 Reporter: Nikoleta Hlavickova <nziakova>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Scott Mumford <smumford>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Nikoleta Hlavickova <nziakova>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2.2, 6.2.3, 6.2.4CC: jdoyle, nziakova, rdickens, rsvoboda, smumford, twells
Target Milestone: ER3   
Target Release: EAP 6.3.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-28 15:29:09 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1051640    

Description Nikoleta Hlavickova 2014-05-13 08:10:06 UTC
These BZ issues were included in EAP 6.2.0 Release Notes and haven't been fixed so they have to be included in EAP 6.3.0 Release Notes too:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019232
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900378
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015524
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021607
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019372
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900321
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023193
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991389
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901231
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956281
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979369
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027126
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918130
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995439
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014048
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026823
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016546
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029851
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027586
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980246
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900047
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900620
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923836
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900609
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900564
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917683

Comment 1 Scott Mumford 2014-05-13 22:15:11 UTC
Since the documentation workflow for release notes is largely automated, the best way to include these bugs in the 6.3.0 document is to clone them and set the target for this release.

Will this cause undue chaos with the development team? 

Or do clones already exist for these issues? I found clones linked for 980246 [1049276] and 917683 [1072343] but neither of those clones has a target release set, so I'm unsure if pointing them at 6.3.0 will break someone's methodology.

Comment 6 Russell Dickenson 2014-05-14 23:47:32 UTC
I believe that the BZ search on which the Release Notes are based should NOT have specified a target release in its search criteria. To test this theory I have created a second BugDash "dashboard" [1].

[1] https://presentations.cloud.lab.eng.bne.redhat.com/release_note_docs/16

Comment 7 Scott Mumford 2014-05-15 00:25:42 UTC
I'm not sure that's a viable approach. We'd be expending resources trying to sort the wheat from the stale chaff (older, irrelevant tickets).

Comment 13 Nikoleta Hlavickova 2014-05-15 13:36:42 UTC
Verified in revision 6.3.0-6