Bug 1132550
Summary: | Multi-Backend Cinder Support | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Scott Lewis <sclewis> |
Component: | openstack-foreman-installer | Assignee: | Jiri Stransky <jstransk> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Yogev Rabl <yrabl> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 4.0 | CC: | aortega, arkady_kanevsky, audra_cooper, ddomingo, derekh, jdonohue, John_walsh, jstransk, mburns, mlopes, morazi, nlevinki, rajini.karthik, rhos-maint, sclewis, scohen, sreichar, yeylon, yrabl |
Target Milestone: | z1 | Keywords: | FutureFeature, OtherQA, TestOnly |
Target Release: | Installer | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://trello.com/c/dLT8Wbs6 | ||
Whiteboard: | MVP | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1125278 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2014-10-02 12:56:30 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1094385, 1125278, 1126562 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1096699, 1105218, 1108193, 1126563, 1132591 |
Comment 3
Yogev Rabl
2014-09-18 12:13:04 UTC
The fact that the UI failed, doesn't mean the puppet fails. moving back to ON_QA. It can remain in on_qa but verification blocked, it doesn't need to be pushed back to engineering for a fix. Rajini, can you, please, comment on it? Not sure if you used latest Staypuft bits for deployment. But you had tested multi-backend cinder functionality. Arkady I tested StayPuft/OSP5 bits and verified that multibackend cinder support works with LVM and Ceph. If the volume_driver is not specified, it will default to LVMISCSIDriver and it worked fine. This is the staypuft version I tested ruby193-rubygem-staypuft-0.2.6-1.el6ost.noarch IMO this is not a bug. This is how it was working before for single backend as well. It is a nice to have feature. From my POV, this feature is not fully ready, so it is not verification failed. Multi-backend is configured and works with the current settings. Adding the missing driver setting can be split off into another bz for a future version, but does not impact whether this was delivered. I disagree. The multiple back end is designed with the option that the user can create a volume and set the back end manually, it is part of this feature core elements. Without the type configuration the multiple back end feature is not available to the users/operators as it was designed, thus this bug is not fully fixed. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1350.html |