Bug 1251129
| Summary: | [RFE] Drop renaming of ovirt prefixed packages to rhevm prefixed packages | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo> | |
| Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Yedidyah Bar David <didi> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Pavol Brilla <pbrilla> | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | high | |||
| Version: | 4.0.0 | CC: | bgraveno, didi, gklein, juwu, lsurette, lsvaty, mgoldboi, pstehlik, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, sbonazzo, sherold, srevivo, ykaul, ylavi | |
| Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.0.0-alpha | Keywords: | CodeChange, FutureFeature | |
| Target Release: | 4.0.0 | Flags: | lsvaty:
testing_plan_complete-
|
|
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | ||
| Doc Text: |
Feature:
Keep package names of RHEV-M identical to those of its upstream project, ovirt-engine, instead of renaming them to have a "rhevm" prefix.
Reason:
Not sure - less confusion? Lower maintenance? TODO
Result:
Package names are now identical between rhevm and ovirt-engine.
Need to make sure packages name are up to date in the docs, but not add a release note on this, since the core package is the same 'rhevm'.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1350214 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-08-23 20:28:23 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | Integration | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | 1299412, 1299414, 1299415, 1350214 | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1348007 | |||
|
Description
Sandro Bonazzola
2015-08-06 13:54:03 UTC
This feature definitely needs documentation, probably in the main docs and not only doc text, but not sure what to write there. Wrote something up, please review. Yaniv, please fix doc-text. Thanks. (In reply to Yedidyah Bar David from comment #19) > Yaniv, please fix doc-text. Thanks. Not customer facing and no docs are required around this. (In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #20) > (In reply to Yedidyah Bar David from comment #19) > > Yaniv, please fix doc-text. Thanks. > > Not customer facing and no docs are required around this. I'd say this is one of the most customer-facing changes for 4.0. Every customer is affected by package names, for normal rpm/yum use at least (if not more complex package tracking systems, inventory etc). Already found a bug in our docs, see bug 1084489 - we say to 'yum install rhevm-websocket-proxy'. Only those packages found with rhevm branding in rhev-4.0.0-18 build rep: # rpm -qa | grep ^rhevm | sort rhevm-4.0.0.6-0.1.el7ev.noarch rhevm-appliance-20160619.0-2.el7ev.noarch rhevm-branding-rhev-4.0.0-1.el7ev.noarch rhevm-dependencies-4.0.0-1.el7ev.noarch rhevm-doc-4.0.0-2.el7ev.noarch rhevm-guest-agent-common-1.0.12-2.el7ev.noarch rhevm-guest-agent-debuginfo-1.0.12-2.el7ev.x86_64 rhevm-guest-agent-gdm-plugin-1.0.12-2.el7ev.noarch rhevm-guest-agent-pam-module-1.0.12-2.el7ev.x86_64 rhevm-setup-plugins-4.0.0.1-1.el7ev.noarch rhevm-spice-client-x64-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch (In reply to Pavol Brilla from comment #23) > Only those packages found with rhevm branding in rhev-4.0.0-18 build rep: > > # rpm -qa | grep ^rhevm | sort > rhevm-4.0.0.6-0.1.el7ev.noarch > rhevm-appliance-20160619.0-2.el7ev.noarch Not mentioned in comment 2, I agree should remain branded (as it's based on RHEL and RHEV). > rhevm-branding-rhev-4.0.0-1.el7ev.noarch > rhevm-dependencies-4.0.0-1.el7ev.noarch > rhevm-doc-4.0.0-2.el7ev.noarch > rhevm-guest-agent-common-1.0.12-2.el7ev.noarch > rhevm-guest-agent-debuginfo-1.0.12-2.el7ev.x86_64 > rhevm-guest-agent-gdm-plugin-1.0.12-2.el7ev.noarch > rhevm-guest-agent-pam-module-1.0.12-2.el7ev.x86_64 guest-agent should have been unbranded too, following comment 2 and comment 3. Sandro? Too late for this, or should we handle? > rhevm-setup-plugins-4.0.0.1-1.el7ev.noarch > rhevm-spice-client-x64-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch > rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch The rest looks ok. (In reply to Yedidyah Bar David from comment #24) > > rhevm-guest-agent-common-1.0.12-2.el7ev.noarch > > rhevm-guest-agent-debuginfo-1.0.12-2.el7ev.x86_64 > > rhevm-guest-agent-gdm-plugin-1.0.12-2.el7ev.noarch > > rhevm-guest-agent-pam-module-1.0.12-2.el7ev.x86_64 > > guest-agent should have been unbranded too, following comment 2 and comment > 3. Sandro? Too late for this, or should we handle? Can you open a urgent bug on this? Opened bug 1350214 as guest-agent has separate bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350334 and it is planned for 4.1, I am verifying this bug. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-1743.html |