Bug 1263888
| Summary: | dnf behaves non deterministically during local install | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Harald Reindl <h.reindl> | ||||||||||||||||||
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek> | ||||||||||||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||||||||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Priority: | high | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Version: | 26 | CC: | bugzilla-redhat, dominik, h.reindl, ignatenko, jamundso, jmracek, manisandro, mike, mls, mluscon, mmraka, packaging-team-maint, pnemade, rpm-software-management, tim.lauridsen, vmukhame, vondruch | ||||||||||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened, Triaged | ||||||||||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | libdnf-0.7.4 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||||||||||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-03-12 21:53:52 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||||||||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Description
Harald Reindl
2015-09-17 01:29:28 UTC
Can you upload the exact RPMs, please? it don't matter which RPM's - my own repos have metadata_expire=30m, dnf-cache-timers are disabled by intention and it happens nearly regulary when do a "dnf update /downloads/*.rpm" the first time when it downloads the metadata (for whatever reason, see other bugreport) whenever that happens, just cursor-up + enter and it works fine [root@rh:/downloads]$ ls
insgesamt 11M
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 34K 2015-09-22 14:43 dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 2,3M 2015-09-22 14:43 glib2-2.44.1-2.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 1,6M 2015-09-22 14:43 icedtea-web-1.6.1-2.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 5,7M 2015-09-22 14:42 plasma-desktop-5.4.1-5.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 57K 2015-09-22 14:43 python3-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 83K 2015-09-22 14:43 python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 468K 2015-09-22 14:43 sqlite-3.8.11.1-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
_________________________________________________
[root@rh:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm
rhsoft-repo with generic rpms 19 kB/s | 4.4 kB 00:00
rhsoft-repo for fedora 552 kB/s | 174 kB 00:00
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:09 ago on Tue Sep 22 14:46:40 2015.
Paket python3-dnf-plugins-core ist nicht installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden.
Fehler: nothing provides python-dnf-plugins-core = 0.1.12-1.fc22 needed by dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-1.fc22.noarch.
package glib2-2.44.1-2.fc22.x86_64 is not installable.
package icedtea-web-1.6.1-2.fc22.x86_64 is not installable.
package plasma-desktop-5.4.1-5.fc22.x86_64 is not installable.
package python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-1.fc22.noarch is not installable.
package sqlite-3.8.11.1-1.fc22.x86_64 is not installable
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)
_________________________________________________
[root@rh:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:34 ago on Tue Sep 22 14:46:40 2015.
Paket python3-dnf-plugins-core ist nicht installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden.
Abhängigkeiten sind aufgelöst.
===================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Paket Arch Version Paketquelle Größe
===================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Aktualisieren:
dnf-plugins-core noarch 0.1.12-1.fc22 @commandline 34 k
glib2 x86_64 2.44.1-2.fc22 @commandline 2.2 M
icedtea-web x86_64 1.6.1-2.fc22 @commandline 1.5 M
plasma-desktop x86_64 5.4.1-5.fc22 @commandline 5.7 M
python-dnf-plugins-core noarch 0.1.12-1.fc22 @commandline 83 k
sqlite x86_64 3.8.11.1-1.fc22 @commandline 468 k
Transaktionsübersicht
===================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Aktualisieren 6 Packages
Gesamtgröße: 10 M
Ist dies in Ordnung? [j/N] :y
Pakete werden heruntergeladen:
boah that is just a joke hopefully - localupdates have worked with YUM virtually ever and now that?
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ ls
insgesamt 121M
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 260K 2015-09-22 19:09 dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 87K 2015-09-22 19:09 dnf-conf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 34K 2015-09-22 19:08 dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 79K 2015-09-22 19:09 dnf-yum-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 34K 2015-09-22 19:08 fedora-easy-karma-0-0.26.20150921gitc932687a.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 73M 2015-09-22 19:30 firefox-41.0-4.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 91K 2015-09-22 19:33 hawkey-0.6.1-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 20M 2015-09-22 19:15 kernel-core-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 9,6M 2015-09-22 19:13 kernel-devel-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 1009K 2015-09-22 19:10 kernel-headers-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 18M 2015-09-22 19:16 kernel-modules-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 84K 2015-09-22 19:33 python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 76K 2015-09-22 19:33 python-hawkey-0.6.1-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:04:01 ago on Tue Sep 22 19:31:24 2015.
Fehler: nothing provides python2-dnf = 1.1.2-2.fc22 needed by dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.
nothing provides python2-dnf >= 1.1.2 needed by python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.fc22.noarch.
nothing provides python2-dnf >= 1.1.2 needed by python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.fc22.noarch.
nothing provides python2-dnf = 1.1.2-2.fc22 needed by dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.
package python-dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22.noarch requires dnf-conf = 1.1.1-2.fc22, but none of the providers can be installed
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:04:19 ago on Tue Sep 22 19:31:24 2015.
Fehler: nothing provides python2-dnf = 1.1.2-2.fc22 needed by dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.
nothing provides python2-dnf >= 1.1.2 needed by python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.fc22.noarch.
nothing provides python2-dnf >= 1.1.2 needed by python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.fc22.noarch.
nothing provides python2-dnf = 1.1.2-2.fc22 needed by dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.
package python-dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22.noarch requires dnf-conf = 1.1.1-2.fc22, but none of the providers can be installed
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ ls
insgesamt 122M
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 260K 2015-09-22 19:09 dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 87K 2015-09-22 19:09 dnf-conf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 34K 2015-09-22 19:08 dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 79K 2015-09-22 19:09 dnf-yum-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 34K 2015-09-22 19:08 fedora-easy-karma-0-0.26.20150921gitc932687a.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 73M 2015-09-22 19:30 firefox-41.0-4.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 91K 2015-09-22 19:33 hawkey-0.6.1-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 20M 2015-09-22 19:15 kernel-core-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 9,6M 2015-09-22 19:13 kernel-devel-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 1009K 2015-09-22 19:10 kernel-headers-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 18M 2015-09-22 19:16 kernel-modules-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 445K 2015-09-22 19:39 python2-dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 84K 2015-09-22 19:33 python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 76K 2015-09-22 19:33 python-hawkey-0.6.1-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:09:13 ago on Tue Sep 22 19:31:24 2015.
Paket python2-dnf ist nicht installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden.
Fehler: package python-dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22.noarch requires dnf-conf = 1.1.1-2.fc22, but none of the providers can be installed
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ ls
insgesamt 122M
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 260K 2015-09-22 19:09 dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 87K 2015-09-22 19:09 dnf-conf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 34K 2015-09-22 19:08 dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 79K 2015-09-22 19:09 dnf-yum-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 34K 2015-09-22 19:08 fedora-easy-karma-0-0.26.20150921gitc932687a.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 73M 2015-09-22 19:30 firefox-41.0-4.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 91K 2015-09-22 19:33 hawkey-0.6.1-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 20M 2015-09-22 19:15 kernel-core-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 9,6M 2015-09-22 19:13 kernel-devel-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 1009K 2015-09-22 19:10 kernel-headers-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 18M 2015-09-22 19:16 kernel-modules-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 445K 2015-09-22 19:39 python2-dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 84K 2015-09-22 19:33 python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 76K 2015-09-22 19:33 python-hawkey-0.6.1-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:09:13 ago on Tue Sep 22 19:31:24 2015.
Paket python2-dnf ist nicht installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden.
Fehler: package python-dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22.noarch requires dnf-conf = 1.1.1-2.fc22, but none of the providers can be installed
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ rpm -Uvh python2-dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
Fehler: Fehlgeschlagende Abhängigkeiten:
dnf-conf = 1.1.2-2.fc22 wird benötigt von python2-dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch
python-hawkey >= 0.6.1 wird benötigt von python2-dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22.noarch
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ rpm -Uvh *.rpm
Fehler: Fehlgeschlagende Abhängigkeiten:
dnf-conf = 1.1.1-2.fc22 wird benötigt von (installiert) python-dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22.noarch
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$
___________________________________________________________________
WTF
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ rpm -Uvh --force --nodeps dnf*.rpm hawkey*.rpm python*.rpm
Vorbereiten... ################################# [100%]
Aktualisierung/ Installation...
1:hawkey-0.6.1-1.fc22 ################################# [ 7%]
2:python-hawkey-0.6.1-1.fc22 ################################# [ 13%]
3:dnf-conf-1.1.2-2.fc22 ################################# [ 20%]
4:python2-dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22 ################################# [ 27%]
5:dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22 ################################# [ 33%]
6:python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.################################# [ 40%]
7:dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.fc22 ################################# [ 47%]
8:dnf-yum-1.1.2-2.fc22 ################################# [ 53%]
Aufräumen/ Entfernen...
9:dnf-yum-1.1.1-2.fc22 ################################# [ 60%]
10:dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-1.fc22 ################################# [ 67%]
11:python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-1.################################# [ 73%]
12:python-hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22 ################################# [ 80%]
13:hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22 ################################# [ 87%]
14:dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22 ################################# [ 93%]
15:dnf-conf-1.1.1-2.fc22 ################################# [100%]
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ package-cleanup --problems
Yum-utils package has been deprecated, use dnf instead.
See 'man yum2dnf' for more information.
Geladene Plugins: etckeeper
Package python-dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22.noarch hat fehlende Abhängigkeiten zu dnf-conf = ('0', '1.1.1', '2.fc22')
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ rpm -e python-dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22.noarch
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ package-cleanup --problems
Yum-utils package has been deprecated, use dnf instead.
See 'man yum2dnf' for more information.
Geladene Plugins: etckeeper
No Problems Found
DNF just don't work reliebale and still stands for "did not finish" - thank you for replacing a working package management with it! [root@rh:/downloads]$ rpm -Uvh --force --nodeps dnf*.rpm hawkey*.rpm python*.rpm Vorbereiten... ################################# [100%] Aktualisierung/ Installation... 1:hawkey-0.6.1-1.fc22 ################################# [ 7%] 2:python-hawkey-0.6.1-1.fc22 ################################# [ 13%] 3:dnf-conf-1.1.2-2.fc22 ################################# [ 20%] 4:python2-dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22 ################################# [ 27%] 5:dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22 ################################# [ 33%] 6:python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.################################# [ 40%] 7:dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.fc22 ################################# [ 47%] 8:dnf-yum-1.1.2-2.fc22 ################################# [ 53%] Aufräumen/ Entfernen... 9:dnf-yum-1.1.1-2.fc22 ################################# [ 60%] 10:dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-1.fc22 ################################# [ 67%] 11:python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-1.################################# [ 73%] 12:python-hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22 ################################# [ 80%] 13:hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22 ################################# [ 87%] 14:dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22 ################################# [ 93%] 15:dnf-conf-1.1.1-2.fc22 ################################# [100%] [root@rh:/downloads]$ rpm -e python-dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22.noarch [root@rh:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm rhsoft-repo with generic rpms 17 kB/s | 4.4 kB 00:00 rhsoft-repo for fedora 561 kB/s | 174 kB 00:00 Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:08 ago on Tue Sep 22 19:47:56 2015. Das Paket dnf ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket dnf-conf ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket dnf-plugins-core ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket dnf-yum ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket hawkey ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket python2-dnf ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket python-dnf-plugins-core ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket python-hawkey ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Fehler: package fedora-easy-karma-0-0.26.20150921gitc932687a.fc22.noarch is not installable. package firefox-41.0-4.fc22.x86_64 is not installable. package kernel-core-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 is not installable. package kernel-devel-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 is not installable. package kernel-headers-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 is not installable. package kernel-modules-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 is not installable (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) [root@rh:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm Last metadata expiration check performed 0:01:50 ago on Tue Sep 22 19:47:56 2015. Das Paket dnf ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket dnf-conf ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket dnf-plugins-core ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket dnf-yum ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket hawkey ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket python2-dnf ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket python-dnf-plugins-core ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket python-hawkey ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Abhängigkeiten sind aufgelöst. =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Paket Arch Version Paketquelle Größe =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Installieren: kernel-core x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @commandline 19 M kernel-devel x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @commandline 9.5 M kernel-modules x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @commandline 18 M Aktualisieren: fedora-easy-karma noarch 0-0.26.20150921gitc932687a.fc22 @commandline 33 k firefox x86_64 41.0-4.fc22 @commandline 72 M kernel-headers x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @commandline 1.0 M Transaktionsübersicht =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Installieren 3 Packages Aktualisieren 3 Packages Gesamtgröße: 120 M Ist dies in Ordnung? [j/N] :y Pakete werden heruntergeladen: Transaktionsüberprüfung wird ausgeführt Transaktionsprüfung war erfolgreich. Transaktion wird getestet Transaktionstest war erfolgreich. Transaktion wird ausgeführt Installieren : kernel-core-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 1/9 Installieren : kernel-modules-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 2/9 Aktualisieren : kernel-headers-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 3/9 Aktualisieren : firefox-41.0-4.fc22.x86_64 4/9 Aktualisieren : fedora-easy-karma-0-0.26.20150921gitc932687a.fc22.noarch 5/9 Installieren : kernel-devel-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 6/9 Aufräumen : kernel-headers-4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 7/9 Aufräumen : fedora-easy-karma-0-0.24.20150508gitc8e437c0.fc22.noarch 8/9 Aufräumen : firefox-41.0-3.fc22.x86_64 9/9 Überprüfung läuft: kernel-core-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 1/9 Überprüfung läuft: kernel-devel-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 2/9 Überprüfung läuft: kernel-modules-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 3/9 Überprüfung läuft: fedora-easy-karma-0-0.26.20150921gitc932687a.fc22.noarch 4/9 Überprüfung läuft: firefox-41.0-4.fc22.x86_64 5/9 Überprüfung läuft: kernel-headers-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 6/9 Überprüfung läuft: fedora-easy-karma-0-0.24.20150508gitc8e437c0.fc22.noarch 7/9 Überprüfung läuft: firefox-41.0-3.fc22.x86_64 8/9 Überprüfung läuft: kernel-headers-4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 9/9 Installiert: kernel-core.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 kernel-devel.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 kernel-modules.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 Aktualisiert: fedora-easy-karma.noarch 0-0.26.20150921gitc932687a.fc22 firefox.x86_64 41.0-4.fc22 kernel-headers.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 Komplett! LAUGHABLE that you developers don't face that issue - are you using yum-deprecated all the time? [root@testserver:/data]$ rpm -Uvh --force --nodeps dnf*.rpm hawkey*.rpm python*.rpm Vorbereiten... ################################# [100%] Aktualisierung/ Installation... 1:hawkey-0.6.1-1.fc22 ################################# [ 7%] 2:python-hawkey-0.6.1-1.fc22 ################################# [ 13%] 3:dnf-conf-1.1.2-2.fc22 ################################# [ 20%] 4:python2-dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22 ################################# [ 27%] 5:dnf-1.1.2-2.fc22 ################################# [ 33%] 6:python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.################################# [ 40%] 7:dnf-plugins-core-0.1.12-2.fc22 ################################# [ 47%] 8:dnf-yum-1.1.2-2.fc22 ################################# [ 53%] Aufräumen/ Entfernen... 9:dnf-yum-1.1.1-2.fc22 ################################# [ 60%] 10:dnf-plugins-core-0.1.11-1.fc22 ################################# [ 67%] 11:python-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.11-1.################################# [ 73%] 12:python-hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22 ################################# [ 80%] 13:hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22 ################################# [ 87%] 14:dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22 ################################# [ 93%] 15:dnf-conf-1.1.1-2.fc22 ################################# [100%] [root@testserver:/data]$ rpm -e python-dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22.noarch [root@testserver:/data]$ dnf update *.rpm RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Nonfree - Test Updates 4.3 kB/s | 399 B 00:00 rhsoft-repo with generic rpms 9.8 kB/s | 4.4 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free - Test Updates 2.6 kB/s | 399 B 00:00 Fedora 22 - x86_64 - Test Updates 809 kB/s | 5.0 MB 00:06 Fedora 22 - x86_64 2.1 MB/s | 41 MB 00:19 RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free - Updates 706 kB/s | 73 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Nonfree - Updates 459 kB/s | 28 kB 00:00 rhsoft-repo for fedora 325 kB/s | 174 kB 00:00 Fedora 22 - x86_64 - Updates 2.3 MB/s | 14 MB 00:06 rhsoft-repo with generic rpms 539 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:09 ago on Tue Sep 22 20:08:40 2015. Das Paket dnf ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket dnf-conf ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket dnf-plugins-core ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket dnf-yum ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket hawkey ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket python2-dnf ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket python-dnf-plugins-core ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket python-hawkey ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Fehler: package fedora-easy-karma-0-0.26.20150921gitc932687a.fc22.noarch is not installable. package hwdata-0.282-1.fc22.noarch is not installable. package kernel-core-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 is not installable. package kernel-headers-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 is not installable. package man-db-2.7.1-9.fc22.x86_64 is not installable (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) [root@testserver:/data]$ dnf update *.rpm Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:33 ago on Tue Sep 22 20:08:40 2015. Das Paket dnf ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket dnf-conf ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket dnf-plugins-core ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket dnf-yum ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket hawkey ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket python2-dnf ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket python-dnf-plugins-core ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Das Paket python-hawkey ist bereits in einer höheren Version installiert, es kann nicht aktualisiert werden. Abhängigkeiten sind aufgelöst. =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Paket Arch Version Paketquelle Größe =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Installieren: kernel-core x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @commandline 19 M Aktualisieren: fedora-easy-karma noarch 0-0.26.20150921gitc932687a.fc22 @commandline 33 k hwdata noarch 0.282-1.fc22 @commandline 1.4 M kernel-headers x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @commandline 1.0 M man-db x86_64 2.7.1-9.fc22 @commandline 822 k Transaktionsübersicht =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Installieren 1 Package Aktualisieren 4 Packages Gesamtgröße: 23 M Ist dies in Ordnung? [j/N] :y Pakete werden heruntergeladen: Transaktionsüberprüfung wird ausgeführt Transaktionsprüfung war erfolgreich. Transaktion wird getestet Transaktionstest war erfolgreich. Transaktion wird ausgeführt Aktualisieren : man-db-2.7.1-9.fc22.x86_64 1/9 Aktualisieren : kernel-headers-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 2/9 Aktualisieren : hwdata-0.282-1.fc22.noarch 3/9 Aktualisieren : fedora-easy-karma-0-0.26.20150921gitc932687a.fc22.noarch 4/9 Installieren : kernel-core-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 5/9 Aufräumen : kernel-headers-4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 6/9 Aufräumen : hwdata-0.281-1.fc22.noarch 7/9 Aufräumen : fedora-easy-karma-0-0.24.20150508gitc8e437c0.fc22.noarch 8/9 Aufräumen : man-db-2.7.1-8.fc22.x86_64 9/9 Überprüfung läuft: kernel-core-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 1/9 Überprüfung läuft: fedora-easy-karma-0-0.26.20150921gitc932687a.fc22.noarch 2/9 Überprüfung läuft: hwdata-0.282-1.fc22.noarch 3/9 Überprüfung läuft: kernel-headers-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 4/9 Überprüfung läuft: man-db-2.7.1-9.fc22.x86_64 5/9 Überprüfung läuft: fedora-easy-karma-0-0.24.20150508gitc8e437c0.fc22.noarch 6/9 Überprüfung läuft: man-db-2.7.1-8.fc22.x86_64 7/9 Überprüfung läuft: kernel-headers-4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 8/9 Überprüfung läuft: hwdata-0.281-1.fc22.noarch 9/9 Do [1], please. The issue that DNF behaves non deterministic when it has all metadata downloaded is wrong and will be tracked in this report. I didn't get what you report in your other comments. Can you tell us the short summory what it does and what you expect, please? tip: post outputs of commands when LANG=en_US.UTF-8 is set. [1] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/wiki/Bug-Reporting#dependency-resolution-problem https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/wiki/Bug-Reporting#dependency-resolution-problem would not be needed if DNF would behave somehow similar to YUM and clearly show *what* it thinks is wrong with dependencies up to libnames and libsonames with DNF it's completly impossible to just look at the output and find out which package is repsonsible to maybe consider removing this one completly from the system all that "only shiny output for noobs to not overwheelm them" is harmful, they noob users typically don't use DNF/YUM in the terminal and the advanced users now need to debug and dig for infos which where just visible many years and frankly *that informations* leaded that i was ablke to understand how all the deps and packages work together - starting today with Linux would mean i never reach the level of knowledge i have today JUST GIVE OUT THE DEPENDECY PROBLEMS ON THE TERMINAL "I didn't get what you report in your other comments" -> well, i didn't get what DNF is trying to report - there is no way to know if it's just another random and wrong "i can't solve deps" or a real problem nor what dependency - and please don't come with the *way too large* logs where you need to find a needle in the haystack another problem: that logs and the size of /var/cache/dnf are as big as complete server setups including userdata here........ the outpout i see most often from dnf is "is not installable" while it is just NOT true, sometimes a second try suceeds, in cases like below it's just too stupid that the pretended "dhcp-compat-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64 is not installable" is the root-cause for "nothing provides dhcp-common = 12:4.3.3-6.fc23" _________________________________________________________________________ --> Starting dependency resolution --> Finished dependency resolution Error: nothing provides dhcp-common = 12:4.3.3-6.fc23 needed by dhcp-client-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64. package dhcp-common-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.noarch is not installable. package dhcp-compat-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64 is not installable. package dhcp-libs-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64 is not installable. package dhcp-relay-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64 is not installable. package dhcp-server-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64 is not installable. package grep-2.22-1.fc23.x86_64 is not installable. package nss-3.20.1-1.0.fc23.x86_64 is not installable. package nss-sysinit-3.20.1-1.0.fc23.x86_64 is not installable. package nss-tools-3.20.1-1.0.fc23.x86_64 is not installable (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) _________________________________________________________________________ [root@rh:/downloads]$ yum-deprecated update *.rpm Yum command has been deprecated, use dnf instead. See 'man dnf' and 'man yum2dnf' for more information. Loaded plugins: etckeeper Examining dbus-1.10.2-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm: 1:dbus-1.10.2-1.fc23.x86_64 Marking dbus-1.10.2-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to 1:dbus-1.10.0-1.fc23.x86_64 Examining dbus-libs-1.10.2-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm: 1:dbus-libs-1.10.2-1.fc23.x86_64 Marking dbus-libs-1.10.2-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to 1:dbus-libs-1.10.0-1.fc23.x86_64 Examining dbus-x11-1.10.2-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm: 1:dbus-x11-1.10.2-1.fc23.x86_64 Marking dbus-x11-1.10.2-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to 1:dbus-x11-1.10.0-1.fc23.x86_64 Examining dhcp-client-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm: 12:dhcp-client-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64 Marking dhcp-client-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to 12:dhcp-client-4.3.3-5.fc23.x86_64 Examining dhcp-common-4.3.3-6.fc23.noarch.rpm: 12:dhcp-common-4.3.3-6.fc23.noarch Marking dhcp-common-4.3.3-6.fc23.noarch.rpm as an update to 12:dhcp-common-4.3.3-5.fc23.noarch Examining dhcp-compat-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm: 12:dhcp-compat-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64 Marking dhcp-compat-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to 12:dhcp-compat-4.3.3-5.fc23.x86_64 Examining dhcp-libs-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm: 12:dhcp-libs-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64 Marking dhcp-libs-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to 12:dhcp-libs-4.3.3-5.fc23.x86_64 Examining dhcp-relay-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm: 12:dhcp-relay-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64 Marking dhcp-relay-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to 12:dhcp-relay-4.3.3-5.fc23.x86_64 Examining dhcp-server-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm: 12:dhcp-server-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64 Marking dhcp-server-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to 12:dhcp-server-4.3.3-5.fc23.x86_64 Examining grep-2.22-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm: grep-2.22-1.fc23.x86_64 Marking grep-2.22-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to grep-2.21-7.fc23.x86_64 Examining nss-3.20.1-1.0.fc23.x86_64.rpm: nss-3.20.1-1.0.fc23.x86_64 Marking nss-3.20.1-1.0.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to nss-3.20.0-1.3.fc23.x86_64 Examining nss-sysinit-3.20.1-1.0.fc23.x86_64.rpm: nss-sysinit-3.20.1-1.0.fc23.x86_64 Marking nss-sysinit-3.20.1-1.0.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to nss-sysinit-3.20.0-1.3.fc23.x86_64 Examining nss-tools-3.20.1-1.0.fc23.x86_64.rpm: nss-tools-3.20.1-1.0.fc23.x86_64 Marking nss-tools-3.20.1-1.0.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to nss-tools-3.20.0-1.3.fc23.x86_64 Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package dbus.x86_64 1:1.10.0-1.fc23 will be updated ---> Package dbus.x86_64 1:1.10.2-1.fc23 will be an update ---> Package dbus-libs.x86_64 1:1.10.0-1.fc23 will be updated ---> Package dbus-libs.x86_64 1:1.10.2-1.fc23 will be an update ---> Package dbus-x11.x86_64 1:1.10.0-1.fc23 will be updated ---> Package dbus-x11.x86_64 1:1.10.2-1.fc23 will be an update ---> Package dhcp-client.x86_64 12:4.3.3-5.fc23 will be updated ---> Package dhcp-client.x86_64 12:4.3.3-6.fc23 will be an update ---> Package dhcp-common.noarch 12:4.3.3-5.fc23 will be updated ---> Package dhcp-common.noarch 12:4.3.3-6.fc23 will be an update ---> Package dhcp-compat.x86_64 12:4.3.3-5.fc23 will be updated ---> Package dhcp-compat.x86_64 12:4.3.3-6.fc23 will be an update ---> Package dhcp-libs.x86_64 12:4.3.3-5.fc23 will be updated ---> Package dhcp-libs.x86_64 12:4.3.3-6.fc23 will be an update ---> Package dhcp-relay.x86_64 12:4.3.3-5.fc23 will be updated ---> Package dhcp-relay.x86_64 12:4.3.3-6.fc23 will be an update ---> Package dhcp-server.x86_64 12:4.3.3-5.fc23 will be updated ---> Package dhcp-server.x86_64 12:4.3.3-6.fc23 will be an update ---> Package grep.x86_64 0:2.21-7.fc23 will be updated ---> Package grep.x86_64 0:2.22-1.fc23 will be an update ---> Package nss.x86_64 0:3.20.0-1.3.fc23 will be updated ---> Package nss.x86_64 0:3.20.1-1.0.fc23 will be an update ---> Package nss-sysinit.x86_64 0:3.20.0-1.3.fc23 will be updated ---> Package nss-sysinit.x86_64 0:3.20.1-1.0.fc23 will be an update ---> Package nss-tools.x86_64 0:3.20.0-1.3.fc23 will be updated ---> Package nss-tools.x86_64 0:3.20.1-1.0.fc23 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution (In reply to Jan Silhan from comment #7) > Do [1], please. > > [1] > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/wiki/Bug-Reporting#dependency- > resolution-problem ^ attach the debugdata, please. Then we could know what you had installed and what are the requirements of packages you want to install. (In reply to Harald Reindl from comment #8) > JUST GIVE OUT THE DEPENDECY PROBLEMS ON THE TERMINAL legit, tracked in the bug 1148627. do you *really* explain me that this issue is not reproducable easily? [harry@rh:~]$ rpm -qa | grep dnf dnf-yum-1.1.3-1.fc23.noarch dnf-plugins-core-0.1.13-1.fc23.noarch python3-dnf-1.1.3-1.fc23.noarch dnf-1.1.3-1.fc23.noarch python3-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.13-1.fc23.noarch etckeeper-dnf-1.18.2-1.fc23.noarch dnf-conf-1.1.3-1.fc23.noarch Created attachment 1093593 [details] here are your debugdata bo idea why you just can't download the packages from koji at your own and type "dnf update *.rpm" in a console, in doubt just install the packages regulary and then "dnf downgrade dhcp\*" and you have all you need to reproduce https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=695813 -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 299K 2015-11-13 12:21 dhcp-client-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 193K 2015-11-13 12:22 dhcp-common-4.3.3-6.fc23.noarch.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 137K 2015-11-13 12:21 dhcp-libs-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 512K 2015-11-13 12:21 dhcp-server-4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm [root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ rpm -q libsolv hawkey dnf libsolv-0.6.14-2.fc23.x86_64 hawkey-0.6.2-1.fc23.x86_64 dnf-1.1.3-1.fc23.noarch pure nonsense - libuuid = 2.27.1-2.fc23 is provided by "libuuid-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm" which is part of * libsolv-0.6.14-2.fc23.x86_64 hawkey-0.6.2-1.fc23.x86_64 dnf-1.1.4-1.fc23.noarch [root@rh:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:50 ago on Wed Nov 18 13:13:35 2015. Package libblkid-devel not installed, cannot update it. Package libfdisk-devel not installed, cannot update it. Package libmount-devel not installed, cannot update it. Package libpng-static not installed, cannot update it. Package libpng-tools not installed, cannot update it. Package libsmartcols-devel not installed, cannot update it. Package libuuid-devel not installed, cannot update it. Package python3-libmount not installed, cannot update it. Package uuidd not installed, cannot update it. Error: nothing provides libuuid = 2.27.1-2.fc23 needed by libblkid-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64. ___________________________________________________ yum-deprecated is *so much* smarter than dnf! Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package hwdata.noarch 0:0.283-1.fc23 will be updated ---> Package hwdata.noarch 0:0.284-1.fc23 will be an update ---> Package libblkid.x86_64 0:2.27.1-1.fc23 will be updated ---> Package libblkid.x86_64 0:2.27.1-2.fc23 will be an update ---> Package libfdisk.x86_64 0:2.27.1-1.fc23 will be updated ---> Package libfdisk.x86_64 0:2.27.1-2.fc23 will be an update ---> Package libmount.x86_64 0:2.27.1-1.fc23 will be updated ---> Package libmount.x86_64 0:2.27.1-2.fc23 will be an update ---> Package libpng.x86_64 2:1.6.17-2.fc23 will be updated ---> Package libpng.x86_64 2:1.6.17-3.fc23 will be an update ---> Package libsmartcols.x86_64 0:2.27.1-1.fc23 will be updated ---> Package libsmartcols.x86_64 0:2.27.1-2.fc23 will be an update ---> Package libuuid.x86_64 0:2.27.1-1.fc23 will be updated ---> Package libuuid.x86_64 0:2.27.1-2.fc23 will be an update ---> Package util-linux.x86_64 0:2.27.1-1.fc23 will be updated ---> Package util-linux.x86_64 0:2.27.1-2.fc23 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution --> Finding unneeded leftover dependencies Found and removing 0 unneeded dependencies Dependencies Resolved ___________________________________________________ [root@rh:/downloads]$ ls insgesamt 5,2M -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 1,4M 2015-11-18 13:12 hwdata-0.284-1.fc23.noarch.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 179K 2015-11-18 13:12 libblkid-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 75K 2015-11-18 13:13 libblkid-devel-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 220K 2015-11-18 13:12 libfdisk-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 75K 2015-11-18 13:13 libfdisk-devel-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 196K 2015-11-18 13:12 libmount-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 76K 2015-11-18 13:13 libmount-devel-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 118K 2015-11-18 13:12 libpng-1.6.17-3.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 121K 2015-11-18 13:12 libpng-static-1.6.17-3.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 42K 2015-11-18 13:12 libpng-tools-1.6.17-3.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 138K 2015-11-18 13:12 libsmartcols-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 71K 2015-11-18 13:13 libsmartcols-devel-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 79K 2015-11-18 13:12 libuuid-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 86K 2015-11-18 13:13 libuuid-devel-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 105K 2015-11-18 13:12 python3-libmount-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 2,2M 2015-11-18 13:12 util-linux-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 93K 2015-11-18 13:12 uuidd-2.27.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm it's also broken for normal operations =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Skipping packages with broken dependencies: kernel-core x86_64 4.3.3-301.fc23 updates-testing 20 M kernel-devel x86_64 4.3.3-301.fc23 updates-testing 10 M kernel-modules x86_64 4.3.3-301.fc23 updates-testing 18 M Transaction Summary =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Skip 3 Packages Nothing to do. Etckeeper plugin: post transaction commit Completion plugin: Generating completion cache... Complete! __________________________________________________________ yum-deprecated: Dependencies Resolved =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Installing: kernel-core x86_64 4.3.3-301.fc23 updates-testing 20 M kernel-devel x86_64 4.3.3-301.fc23 updates-testing 10 M kernel-modules x86_64 4.3.3-301.fc23 updates-testing 18 M Transaction Summary =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Install 3 Packages Total download size: 48 M Installed size: 106 M Is this ok [y/d/N]: y what " libsolv " version have you got? i did have problems like these but once downgraded libsolv from 0.6.15 to 0.6.14 in F23 it now works as expected perhaps the libsolv package maintainers could package 0.6.17 just look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888#c12 with no single feedback from the developers - they would NOT need any debug data, just try it out with random packages containing sub-package dependencies "non deterministically" is plain wrong IT IS deterministically with local packages the kernel above was a ordinary "dnf upgrade" harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q libsolv libsolv-0.6.15-1.fc23.x86_64 as i suggested, Downgrade YOUR LIBSOLV to 0.6.14. cause 0.6.15 is Buggy comment 14 was only a side note - you got it? please realize that this *only* would solve regular kernel updates, wehn you look at bodhi i typically download kernels from koji and then we are at the *real* topic of this bugreport that DNF don't work and never worked proper with "dnf update *.rpm" - period it's laughable [root@rh:/downloads]$ ls total 41M -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 220K 2016-02-25 11:29 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 32M 2016-02-25 11:30 java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 3.1M 2016-02-25 11:28 qt5-qtbase-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 23K 2016-02-25 11:28 qt5-qtbase-common-5.5.1-12.fc23.noarch.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 5.3M 2016-02-25 11:28 qt5-qtbase-gui-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64.rpm __________________________________________ [root@rh:/downloads]$ dnf -y update *.rpm Last metadata expiration check performed 0:24:30 ago on Thu Feb 25 11:08:20 2016. Error: package qt5-qtbase-gui-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64 is not installable. package qt5-qtbase-gui-5.5.1-11.fc23.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.5.1-11.fc23, but none of the providers can be installed. package plasma-workspace-5.5.4-3.fc23.x86_64 requires plasma-workspace-libs(x86-64) = 5.5.4-3.fc23, but none of the providers can be installed (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) __________________________________________ [root@rh:/downloads]$ yum-deprecated -y update *.rpm Yum command has been deprecated, use dnf instead. See 'man dnf' and 'man yum2dnf' for more information. Loaded plugins: etckeeper Examining java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64.rpm: 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64 Marking java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.72-6.b15.fc23.x86_64 Examining java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64.rpm: 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64 Marking java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.72-6.b15.fc23.x86_64 Examining qt5-qtbase-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64.rpm: qt5-qtbase-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64 Marking qt5-qtbase-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to qt5-qtbase-5.5.1-11.fc23.x86_64 Examining qt5-qtbase-common-5.5.1-12.fc23.noarch.rpm: qt5-qtbase-common-5.5.1-12.fc23.noarch Marking qt5-qtbase-common-5.5.1-12.fc23.noarch.rpm as an update to qt5-qtbase-common-5.5.1-11.fc23.noarch Examining qt5-qtbase-gui-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64.rpm: qt5-qtbase-gui-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64 Marking qt5-qtbase-gui-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to qt5-qtbase-gui-5.5.1-11.fc23.x86_64 Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package java-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64 1:1.8.0.72-6.b15.fc23 will be updated ---> Package java-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64 1:1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23 will be an update ---> Package java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless.x86_64 1:1.8.0.72-6.b15.fc23 will be updated ---> Package java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless.x86_64 1:1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23 will be an update ---> Package qt5-qtbase.x86_64 0:5.5.1-11.fc23 will be updated ---> Package qt5-qtbase.x86_64 0:5.5.1-12.fc23 will be an update ---> Package qt5-qtbase-common.noarch 0:5.5.1-11.fc23 will be updated ---> Package qt5-qtbase-common.noarch 0:5.5.1-12.fc23 will be an update ---> Package qt5-qtbase-gui.x86_64 0:5.5.1-11.fc23 will be updated ---> Package qt5-qtbase-gui.x86_64 0:5.5.1-12.fc23 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution --> Finding unneeded leftover dependencies Found and removing 0 unneeded dependencies Dependencies Resolved =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Updating: java-1.8.0-openjdk x86_64 1:1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23 /java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64 499 k java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless x86_64 1:1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23 /java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64 103 M qt5-qtbase x86_64 5.5.1-12.fc23 /qt5-qtbase-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64 8.4 M qt5-qtbase-common noarch 5.5.1-12.fc23 /qt5-qtbase-common-5.5.1-12.fc23.noarch 0.0 qt5-qtbase-gui x86_64 5.5.1-12.fc23 /qt5-qtbase-gui-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64 16 M Transaction Summary =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Upgrade 5 Packages Total size: 127 M Downloading packages: Running transaction check Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded Running transaction etckeeper: pre transaction commit Warning: RPMDB altered outside of yum. Updating : qt5-qtbase-common-5.5.1-12.fc23.noarch 1/10 Updating : qt5-qtbase-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64 2/10 Updating : 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64 3/10 warning: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64/jre/lib/security/java.security created as /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64/jre/lib/security/java.security.rpmnew Updating : 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64 4/10 Updating : qt5-qtbase-gui-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64 5/10 Cleanup : qt5-qtbase-gui-5.5.1-11.fc23.x86_64 6/10 Cleanup : qt5-qtbase-common-5.5.1-11.fc23.noarch 7/10 Cleanup : qt5-qtbase-5.5.1-11.fc23.x86_64 8/10 Cleanup : 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.72-6.b15.fc23.x86_64 9/10 Cleanup : 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.72-6.b15.fc23.x86_64 10/10 etckeeper: post transaction commit Verifying : qt5-qtbase-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64 1/10 Verifying : 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64 2/10 Verifying : qt5-qtbase-common-5.5.1-12.fc23.noarch 3/10 Verifying : 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23.x86_64 4/10 Verifying : qt5-qtbase-gui-5.5.1-12.fc23.x86_64 5/10 Verifying : 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.72-6.b15.fc23.x86_64 6/10 Verifying : qt5-qtbase-5.5.1-11.fc23.x86_64 7/10 Verifying : qt5-qtbase-gui-5.5.1-11.fc23.x86_64 8/10 Verifying : qt5-qtbase-common-5.5.1-11.fc23.noarch 9/10 Verifying : 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.72-6.b15.fc23.x86_64 10/10 Updated: java-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64 1:1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23 java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless.x86_64 1:1.8.0.72-7.b15.fc23 qt5-qtbase.x86_64 0:5.5.1-12.fc23 qt5-qtbase-common.noarch 0:5.5.1-12.fc23 qt5-qtbase-gui.x86_64 0:5.5.1-12.fc23 Complete! *** Bug 1324470 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** and you *really* wonder when people are upset about DNF? [root@rh:/downloads]$ ls total 396K -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 273K 2016-04-14 16:21 avahi-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 15K 2016-04-14 16:21 avahi-glib-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 61K 2016-04-14 16:21 avahi-libs-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 39K 2016-04-14 16:21 avahi-tools-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm [root@rh:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:18 ago on Thu Apr 14 16:22:26 2016. Error: nothing provides avahi-libs(x86-64) = 0.6.32-1.fc23 needed by avahi-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64. nothing provides avahi-libs(x86-64) = 0.6.32-1.fc23 needed by avahi-glib-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64. package avahi-libs-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64 is not installable. package avahi-tools-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64 is not installable (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) [root@rh:/downloads]$ yum-deprecated --disablerepo=\* update *.rpm Yum command has been deprecated, use dnf instead. See 'man dnf' and 'man yum2dnf' for more information. Loaded plugins: etckeeper Examining avahi-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm: avahi-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64 Marking avahi-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to avahi-0.6.32-0.4.rc.fc23.x86_64 Examining avahi-glib-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm: avahi-glib-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64 Marking avahi-glib-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to avahi-glib-0.6.32-0.4.rc.fc23.x86_64 Examining avahi-libs-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm: avahi-libs-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64 Marking avahi-libs-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to avahi-libs-0.6.32-0.4.rc.fc23.x86_64 Examining avahi-tools-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm: avahi-tools-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64 Marking avahi-tools-0.6.32-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm as an update to avahi-tools-0.6.32-0.4.rc.fc23.x86_64 Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package avahi.x86_64 0:0.6.32-0.4.rc.fc23 will be updated ---> Package avahi.x86_64 0:0.6.32-1.fc23 will be an update ---> Package avahi-glib.x86_64 0:0.6.32-0.4.rc.fc23 will be updated ---> Package avahi-glib.x86_64 0:0.6.32-1.fc23 will be an update ---> Package avahi-libs.x86_64 0:0.6.32-0.4.rc.fc23 will be updated ---> Package avahi-libs.x86_64 0:0.6.32-1.fc23 will be an update ---> Package avahi-tools.x86_64 0:0.6.32-0.4.rc.fc23 will be updated ---> Package avahi-tools.x86_64 0:0.6.32-1.fc23 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution --> Finding unneeded leftover dependencies Found and removing 0 unneeded dependencies Dependencies Resolved This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. this was *never* solved and hence a system without yum-deprecated is still unuseable when someone wants to helpf fedora-development with early testing or builds packages local That debugdata is useless: disable: unknown package 'dhcp-common-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.noarch@@commandline' disable: unknown package 'dhcp-libs-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64@@commandline' disable: unknown package 'dhcp-server-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64@@commandline' str2job: unknown package 'dhcp-client-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64@@commandline' str2job: unknown package 'dhcp-common-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.noarch@@commandline' str2job: unknown package 'dhcp-libs-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64@@commandline' str2job: unknown package 'dhcp-server-12:4.3.3-6.fc23.x86_64@@commandline' guess it has been fixed. Can you provide some minimal example which I can reproduce? dunno what is there useless - that's what it gave out while pretended that deps are broken while not realize that the pretended missing one is within * on the command line that typically happens everytime when "dnf update *.rpm" has involved sub-packages with version-dependencies between the local rpm packages well, it's a longer time since a touched DNF bedcause "yum --disablerepo=\* update *.rpm" works relieable and without download metadata where DNF cries that no repo is available here you go on F24: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=784346 "guess it has been fixed" - nothing has been fixed and everybody of the developers who really would care could have found a simple reprodcuer over all the months - yum *never* had such problems over a decade ______________________________________ [root@rh:/downloads]$ ls | grep rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 5.1M 2016-07-21 10:51 systemd-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 151K 2016-07-21 12:07 systemd-compat-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 456K 2016-07-21 10:51 systemd-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 1.2M 2016-07-21 10:51 systemd-udev-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm ______________________________________ [root@rh:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm Last metadata expiration check: 0:17:29 ago on Thu Jul 21 11:50:15 2016. Error: nothing provides systemd-libs = 229-9.fc24 needed by systemd-229-9.fc24.x86_64. nothing provides systemd-libs(x86-64) = 229-9.fc24 needed by systemd-compat-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64. package systemd-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64 is not installable. package systemd-udev-229-9.fc24.x86_64 is not installable (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) ______________________________________ [root@rh:/downloads]$ yum-deprecated update *.rpm Yum command has been deprecated, use dnf instead. See 'man dnf' and 'man yum2dnf' for more information. Loaded plugins: etckeeper Examining systemd-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm: systemd-229-9.fc24.x86_64 Marking systemd-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm as an update to systemd-229-8.fc24.x86_64 Examining systemd-compat-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm: systemd-compat-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64 Marking systemd-compat-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm as an update to systemd-compat-libs-229-8.fc24.x86_64 Examining systemd-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm: systemd-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64 Marking systemd-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm as an update to systemd-libs-229-8.fc24.x86_64 Examining systemd-udev-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm: systemd-udev-229-9.fc24.x86_64 Marking systemd-udev-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm as an update to systemd-udev-229-8.fc24.x86_64 Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package systemd.x86_64 0:229-8.fc24 will be updated ---> Package systemd.x86_64 0:229-9.fc24 will be an update ---> Package systemd-compat-libs.x86_64 0:229-8.fc24 will be updated ---> Package systemd-compat-libs.x86_64 0:229-9.fc24 will be an update ---> Package systemd-libs.x86_64 0:229-8.fc24 will be updated ---> Package systemd-libs.x86_64 0:229-9.fc24 will be an update ---> Package systemd-udev.x86_64 0:229-8.fc24 will be updated ---> Package systemd-udev.x86_64 0:229-9.fc24 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution --> Finding unneeded leftover dependencies Found and removing 0 unneeded dependencies Dependencies Resolved Harald please keep calm... # ls -l systemd-* -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 5317384 Jul 21 12:22 systemd-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 466374 Jul 21 12:23 systemd-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1234510 Jul 21 12:23 systemd-udev-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm # dnf update ./systemd-* Last metadata expiration check: 1:24:27 ago on Thu Jul 21 10:59:35 2016. Dependencies resolved. ========================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ========================================================================================================== Upgrading: systemd x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 5.1 M systemd-libs x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 455 k systemd-udev x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 1.2 M Transaction Summary ========================================================================================================== Upgrade 3 Packages Total size: 6.7 M Is this ok [y/N]: We can't reproduce your bug, so now what? We need to figure out what's the difference between your system and fresh F24 (from the test above) which causes the bug you see. If you can help us to find the cause please do otherwise it's really hard to fix the bug we can't see. it's interesting that you don't take "systemd-compat-libs" into the game since the error is "nothing provides systemd-libs(x86-64) = 229-9.fc24 needed by systemd-compat-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64" and without that package in the transaction the *real problem* that DNF is unable to solve such deps when the required versioned dependencie is part of the local files (In reply to Harald Reindl from comment #30) > it's interesting that you don't take "systemd-compat-libs" into the game > since the error is "nothing provides systemd-libs(x86-64) = 229-9.fc24 > needed by systemd-compat-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64" and without that package in > the transaction the *real problem* that DNF is unable to solve such deps > when the required versioned dependencie is part of the local files [brain@x1carbon ~]$ sudo docker run -it --rm fedora:24 bash [root@35f5beb3adbf /]# cd mnt [root@35f5beb3adbf mnt]# rpm -qa | grep "^systemd" | sort -n systemd-229-8.fc24.x86_64 systemd-libs-229-8.fc24.x86_64 [root@35f5beb3adbf mnt]# dnf install systemd-compat-libs Fedora 24 - x86_64 2.8 MB/s | 47 MB 00:16 Fedora 24 - x86_64 - Updates 2.6 MB/s | 11 MB 00:04 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:04 ago on Thu Jul 21 11:13:14 2016. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================================================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================================================================================================================ Installing: systemd-compat-libs x86_64 229-8.fc24 fedora 151 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================================================================================================================ Install 1 Package Total download size: 151 k Installed size: 265 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: systemd-compat-libs-229-8.fc24.x86_64.rpm 195 kB/s | 151 kB 00:00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 70 kB/s | 151 kB 00:02 Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded. Running transaction Installing : systemd-compat-libs-229-8.fc24.x86_64 1/1 Verifying : systemd-compat-libs-229-8.fc24.x86_64 1/1 Installed: systemd-compat-libs.x86_64 229-8.fc24 Complete! [root@35f5beb3adbf mnt]# curl -O https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/systemd/229/9.fc24/x86_64/systemd-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 5192k 100 5192k 0 0 1198k 0 0:00:04 0:00:04 --:--:-- 1198k [root@35f5beb3adbf mnt]# curl -O https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/systemd/229/9.fc24/x86_64/systemd-compat-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 150k 100 150k 0 0 70148 0 0:00:02 0:00:02 --:--:-- 70169 [root@35f5beb3adbf mnt]# curl -O https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/systemd/229/9.fc24/x86_64/systemd-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 455k 100 455k 0 0 202k 0 0:00:02 0:00:02 --:--:-- 202k [root@35f5beb3adbf mnt]# dnf --disablerepo=\* -C update ./*.rpm Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================================================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================================================================================================================ Upgrading: systemd x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 5.1 M systemd-compat-libs x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 151 k systemd-libs x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 455 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================================================================================================================ Upgrade 3 Packages Total size: 5.7 M Is this ok [y/N]: n Operation aborted. provide some real easy reproducer that we will be able reproduce -> fix. seriously? * just install systemd-compat-libs before try to update * download the *four* packages of comment 28 * cd downloadfolder * dnf update *.rpm DNF fails when local packages have hard, version dependent deps between themself, that's it and *no* that is not systemd related - the whole bugreport shows several exmaples over months where "x requires y in version z but nothing provides it" while the package with provides it is part of * "dnf --disablerepo=\* -C update ./*.rpm" - so why can't you just do the same as the reporter? we had also cases where DNF pretended unsolveable deps without mention what is the problem when metadata of a repo with a short cachetime where refreshed due "dnf update *.rpm" just press cursor-up+enter and suddenly it worked - multiple times, for multiple transactions - look at the bugreports from last year > it's interesting that you don't take "systemd-compat-libs" into the game
> since the error is "nothing provides systemd-libs(x86-64) = 229-9.fc24
> needed by systemd-compat-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64" and without that package in
> the transaction the *real problem* that DNF is unable to solve such deps
> when the required versioned dependencie is part of the local files
Ok, my fault for not reading carefully. systemd-compat-libs was not installed on my system so I skipped it. On the other hand still works for me:
# dnf install systemd-compat-libs
...
Installed:
systemd-compat-libs.x86_64 229-8.fc24
# ls -l systemd-*
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 5317384 Jul 21 12:22 systemd-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 154162 Jul 21 13:36 systemd-compat-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 466374 Jul 21 12:23 systemd-libs-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1234510 Jul 21 12:23 systemd-udev-229-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm
# dnf update ./systemd-*
Last metadata expiration check: 2:40:37 ago on Thu Jul 21 10:59:35 2016.
Dependencies resolved.
===============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
===============================================================================
Upgrading:
systemd x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 5.1 M
systemd-compat-libs x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 151 k
systemd-libs x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 455 k
systemd-udev x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 1.2 M
Transaction Summary
===============================================================================
Upgrade 4 Packages
Total size: 6.8 M
Is this ok [y/N]:
# dnf --disablerepo=\* -C update ./systemd-*
Dependencies resolved.
===============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
===============================================================================
Upgrading:
systemd x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 5.1 M
systemd-compat-libs x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 151 k
systemd-libs x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 455 k
systemd-udev x86_64 229-9.fc24 @commandline 1.2 M
Transaction Summary
===============================================================================
Upgrade 4 Packages
Total size: 6.8 M
Is this ok [y/N]:
There's likely something different in your configuration which triggers the error.
ok, so i will try later or tomorrow on a VM downgrade and upgrade with debuginfos, now then we at least are trying to do the same and there is feedback not like the last time where nothing came back after provide the requested data until yesterday 2015-11-09 11:23:13 EST attach the debugdata, please 2015-11-13 06:30 EST here are your debugdata (7.44 MB, application/octet-stream) 2016-07-08 This package has changed ownership 2016-07-21 That debugdata is useless while i still don't get *what* is useless there i really have no idea *why* DNF acts *that non deterministically* just downgraded systemd to the 229-8.fc24 build, dnf update *.rpm with the downloads -> works this time fine (3 attempts, 1 downloaded repo-metadata too) and so it seems we really need to figure out what in the debugdata from "2015-11-13 06:30" is unusable since they are generated as advised (In reply to Harald Reindl from comment #37) > i really have no idea *why* DNF acts *that non deterministically* > > just downgraded systemd to the 229-8.fc24 build, dnf update *.rpm with the > downloads -> works this time fine (3 attempts, 1 downloaded repo-metadata > too) and so it seems we really need to figure out what in the debugdata from > "2015-11-13 06:30" is unusable since they are generated as advised I guess this has been fixed at some point in DNF. We had a lot of releases since that. for sure not - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888#c28 - was TODAY for a brand new systemd-build which made it hours later into updates-testing Created attachment 1184268 [details]
another debugdata
again a random error and in "dnf.log" there is a python stacktrace too
[root@rh:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm
Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:56 ago on Tue Jul 26 14:48:07 2016.
Error: package gd-2.2.3-2.fc24.x86_64 is not installable
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)
_________________________________
Jul 26 14:57:04 DEBUG --> Starting dependency resolution
Jul 26 14:57:04 DEBUG --> Finished dependency resolution
Jul 26 14:57:04 DDEBUG timer: depsolve: 82 ms
Jul 26 14:57:04 SUBDEBUG
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 120, in _main
ret = resolving(cli, base)
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 139, in resolving
base.resolve(cli.demands.allow_erasing)
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 541, in resolve
raise exc
dnf.exceptions.DepsolveError: package gd-2.2.3-2.fc24.x86_64 is not installable
Jul 26 14:57:04 CRITICAL Error: package gd-2.2.3-2.fc24.x86_64 is not installable
Jul 26 14:57:04 INFO (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)
Jul 26 14:57:04 DDEBUG Cleaning up.
_________________________________
as always "yum-deprecated" works like a charme
yum-deprecated --disablerepo=\* update *.rpm
Updated:
bind.x86_64 32:9.10.4-1.P2.fc24 bind-chroot.x86_64 32:9.10.4-1.P2.fc24 bind-libs.x86_64 32:9.10.4-1.P2.fc24 bind-libs-lite.x86_64 32:9.10.4-1.P2.fc24 bind-license.noarch 32:9.10.4-1.P2.fc24
bind-utils.x86_64 32:9.10.4-1.P2.fc24 gd.x86_64 0:2.2.3-2.fc24
_________________________________
[root@rh:/downloads]$ ls | grep rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 1.9M 2016-07-26 14:46 bind-9.10.4-1.P2.fc24.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 90K 2016-07-26 14:46 bind-chroot-9.10.4-1.P2.fc24.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 151K 2016-07-26 14:46 bind-libs-9.10.4-1.P2.fc24.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 1.1M 2016-07-26 14:46 bind-libs-lite-9.10.4-1.P2.fc24.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 89K 2016-07-26 14:46 bind-license-9.10.4-1.P2.fc24.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 407K 2016-07-26 14:46 bind-utils-9.10.4-1.P2.fc24.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 135K 2016-07-26 14:47 gd-2.2.3-2.fc24.x86_64.rpm
now I realized that debugdata is useless due to dnf bug (hawkey actually) as it creates multiple @commandline repos with empty info. Can you give some reproducer based on Fedora 24 container image? no, i can't give a clear reproducer, i just see that behavior often from day one and in most cases where i intend to update a bnuch of packages from koji downloads i started to use yum-deprecated in general to prevent anger since my goal is test packages and give karma as soon it is possible and makes sense also that "dnf --disablerepo=\*" by default don't work without add another param is annoying because when i know that all deps are solveable with the local files provided there is no need to download metadata (yum in the past did that only when it had to solve a additional dependency and was degraded in that context in the meantime too) *** Bug 1270779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ___________________________________ [root@testserver:/data]$ dnf update *.rpm Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:41 ago on Tue Aug 30 15:48:58 2016. Package pango-devel not installed, cannot update it. Error: package pango-1.40.2-1.fc24.x86_64 is not installable. package pcre-8.39-3.fc24.x86_64 is not installable. package pcre-devel-8.39-3.fc24.x86_64 is not installable (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) ___________________________________ [root@testserver:/data]$ yum-deprecated --disablerepo=\* update *.rpm Yum command has been deprecated, use dnf instead. See 'man dnf' and 'man yum2dnf' for more information. Examining libinput-1.4.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm: libinput-1.4.2-1.fc24.x86_64 Marking libinput-1.4.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm as an update to libinput-1.4.1-1.fc24.x86_64 Examining pango-1.40.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm: pango-1.40.2-1.fc24.x86_64 Marking pango-1.40.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm as an update to pango-1.40.1-1.fc24.x86_64 Examining pango-devel-1.40.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm: pango-devel-1.40.2-1.fc24.x86_64 Package pango-devel not installed, cannot update it. Run yum install to install it instead. Examining pcre-8.39-3.fc24.x86_64.rpm: pcre-8.39-3.fc24.x86_64 Marking pcre-8.39-3.fc24.x86_64.rpm as an update to pcre-8.39-2.fc24.x86_64 Examining pcre-devel-8.39-3.fc24.x86_64.rpm: pcre-devel-8.39-3.fc24.x86_64 Marking pcre-devel-8.39-3.fc24.x86_64.rpm as an update to pcre-devel-8.39-2.fc24.x86_64 Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package libinput.x86_64 0:1.4.1-1.fc24 will be updated ---> Package libinput.x86_64 0:1.4.2-1.fc24 will be an update ---> Package pango.x86_64 0:1.40.1-1.fc24 will be updated ---> Package pango.x86_64 0:1.40.2-1.fc24 will be an update ---> Package pcre.x86_64 0:8.39-2.fc24 will be updated ---> Package pcre.x86_64 0:8.39-3.fc24 will be an update ---> Package pcre-devel.x86_64 0:8.39-2.fc24 will be updated ---> Package pcre-devel.x86_64 0:8.39-3.fc24 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution --> Finding unneeded leftover dependencies Found and removing 0 unneeded dependencies Dependencies Resolved Updated: libinput.x86_64 0:1.4.2-1.fc24 pango.x86_64 0:1.40.2-1.fc24 pcre.x86_64 0:8.39-3.fc24 pcre-devel.x86_64 0:8.39-3.fc24 --debugsolver Created attachment 1195930 [details]
debugdata again
Created attachment 1195932 [details]
debugdata again - different machine
if that debugdata is again not useable i suggest dnf developers starting to fix that so users can at least provide useful informations DNF in general is very silent in case of dependency errors compared to YUM which tells you files and sonames where problems are - well in that case it's clear that it can't output something useful because there is no problem in the deps but in DNF or it's libraries given how long we are now punished with deprecation warnings while tehre is still no full replacement of "yum-utils" (especially package-cleanup and repomanage --old) and critical things like "yum --security update" are also still missing people get REALLY tired [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -qa | grep dnf python3-dnf-1.1.10-1.fc24.noarch dnf-1.1.10-1.fc24.noarch dnf-plugins-core-0.1.21-3.fc24.noarch dnf-conf-1.1.10-1.fc24.noarch python3-dnf-plugins-core-0.1.21-3.fc24.noarch dnf-yum-1.1.10-1.fc24.noarch etckeeper-dnf-1.18.5-1.fc24.noarch [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q hawkey hawkey-0.6.3-5.fc24.x86_64 [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q libsolv libsolv-0.6.23-2.fc24.x86_64 basically something is wrong here: str2job: unknown package 'pcre-devel-8.39-3.fc24.x86_64@@commandline' which is really weird. Looking more. > package-cleanup It never worked correctly. Though there is some replacement for it in DNF itself. > repomanage it's in dnf-plugins-extras for long time. package-cleanup --leaves --all as well as --orphans are working correctly here for many years while the replacements in DNF rely on /var/lib/dnf instead of the rpm databas itself which makes them completely fragile and useless Michael, could you take a look why it prints our "str2job: unknown package 'pcre-devel-8.39-3.fc24.x86_64@@commandline'". It looks correctly defined in repos. Because the package is disabled. This is a bug, of course, the testcase reader should still use the package even if it is disabled. I'll change the code. But I guess dnf should not exclude packages from the command line when you do --disablerepo=\*. It should only disable "real" repos. oh and when you are at it "--cacheonly" could be implicit in case of all network repos disabled as yum did for a decade.... (In reply to Michael Schröder from comment #52) > Because the package is disabled. Where do you see it? This is what I checked in first place, but have not found. The testcase contains: disable pkg pcre-8.39-3.fc24.x86_64@@commandline So after all I was able to reproduce on DNF 2.0... [brain@brain python-serpy]$ sudo dnf install ./openssl-* --debugsolver [sudo] password for brain: Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:16 ago on Mon Nov 14 17:07:56 2016 CET. Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rhpkg-rawhide', disabling. Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package authconfig-6.2.10-14.fc25.x86_64 - package authconfig-6.2.10-14.fc25.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/openssl, but none of the providers can be installed - package authconfig-6.2.10-14.fc25.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/openssl, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both openssl-1:1.1.0b-4.fc26.x86_64 and openssl-1:1.1.0c-1.fc26.x86_64 - cannot install both openssl-1:1.1.0b-4.fc26.x86_64 and openssl-1:1.1.0c-1.fc26.x86_64 - conflicting requests Problem 2: problem with installed package realmd-0.16.2-5.fc25.x86_64 - package realmd-0.16.2-5.fc25.x86_64 requires authconfig, but none of the providers can be installed - package realmd-0.16.2-5.fc25.x86_64 requires authconfig, but none of the providers can be installed - package authconfig-6.2.10-14.fc25.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/openssl, but none of the providers can be installed - package authconfig-6.2.10-14.fc25.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/openssl, but none of the providers can be installed - package openssl-1:1.1.0c-1.fc26.x86_64 requires openssl-libs(x86-64) = 1:1.1.0c-1.fc26, but none of the providers can be installed - package openssl-1:1.1.0c-1.fc26.x86_64 requires openssl-libs(x86-64) = 1:1.1.0c-1.fc26, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both openssl-libs-1:1.1.0b-4.fc26.x86_64 and openssl-libs-1:1.1.0c-1.fc26.x86_64 - cannot install both openssl-libs-1:1.1.0b-4.fc26.x86_64 and openssl-libs-1:1.1.0c-1.fc26.x86_64 - conflicting requests Problem 3: problem with installed package fprintd-pam-0.7.0-1.fc26.x86_64 - package fprintd-pam-0.7.0-1.fc26.x86_64 requires authconfig, but none of the providers can be installed - package fprintd-pam-0.7.0-1.fc26.x86_64 requires authconfig, but none of the providers can be installed - package authconfig-6.2.10-14.fc25.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/openssl, but none of the providers can be installed - package authconfig-6.2.10-14.fc25.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/openssl, but none of the providers can be installed - package openssl-1:1.1.0c-1.fc26.x86_64 requires openssl-libs(x86-64) = 1:1.1.0c-1.fc26, but none of the providers can be installed - package openssl-1:1.1.0c-1.fc26.x86_64 requires openssl-libs(x86-64) = 1:1.1.0c-1.fc26, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both openssl-libs-1:1.1.0b-4.fc26.x86_64 and openssl-libs-1:1.1.0c-1.fc26.x86_64 - cannot install both openssl-libs-1:1.1.0b-4.fc26.x86_64 and openssl-libs-1:1.1.0c-1.fc26.x86_64 - package openssl-devel-1:1.1.0b-4.fc26.x86_64 requires openssl-libs(x86-64) = 1:1.1.0b-4.fc26, but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) but then I do: [brain@brain python-serpy]$ testsolv -r debugdata/testcase.t downgrade openssl-1:1.1.0c-1.fc26.x86_64@@System openssl-1:1.1.0b-4.fc26.x86_64@@commandline downgrade openssl-devel-1:1.1.0c-1.fc26.x86_64@@System openssl-devel-1:1.1.0b-4.fc26.x86_64@@commandline downgrade openssl-libs-1:1.1.0c-1.fc26.x86_64@@System openssl-libs-1:1.1.0b-4.fc26.x86_64@@commandline which is now able to find solution. thanks for changing priority to high while i am not teriible happy with "24 -> rawhide" since that's the major reason i *must* use yum-deprecated in a lot of environments and the deprectaion warnings when i already call "yum-deprecated" by name making me angry for a long time now (especially since they spit into cron-mails) *** Bug 1397108 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 1222621 [details] debugdata Ok, I have simpler reproducer similar/related to bug 1397108: 1. $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --scrub all 2. $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --init 3. $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --chroot "rpm -q vim\* -a" 4. $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -i https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/vim/8.0.086/1.fc26/x86_64/vim-X11-8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/vim/8.0.086/1.fc26/x86_64/vim-common-8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/vim/8.0.086/1.fc26/x86_64/vim-enhanced-8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/vim/8.0.086/1.fc26/x86_64/vim-filesystem-8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/vim/8.0.086/1.fc26/x86_64/vim-minimal-8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm vim-commentary vim-taglist vim-fugitive vim-nerdtree sudo This fails with this error: ``` Error: Problem 1: conflicting requests - package vim-fugitive-2.2-5.fc25.noarch requires /usr/bin/vim, but none of the providers can be installed - package vim-fugitive-2.2-5.fc25.noarch requires /usr/bin/vim, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both vim-enhanced-2:8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64 and vim-enhanced-2:8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64 - cannot install both vim-enhanced-2:8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64 and vim-enhanced-2:8.0.094-1.fc26.x86_64 - conflicting requests Problem 2: conflicting requests - package sudo-1.8.19-0.2.20161108git738c3cb.fc26.i686 requires /usr/bin/vi, but none of the providers can be installed - package sudo-1.8.19-0.2.20161108git738c3cb.fc26.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/vi, but none of the providers can be installed - package sudo-1.8.19-0.2.20161108git738c3cb.fc26.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/vi, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both vim-minimal-2:8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64 and vim-minimal-2:8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64 - cannot install both vim-minimal-2:8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64 and vim-minimal-2:8.0.094-1.fc26.x86_64 - conflicting requests ``` What caught my attention is the mixture of vim-enhanced-2:8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64 and vim-enhanced-2:8.0.094-1.fc26.x86_64. Ok, I tried to install rev 086, but the same mixture appears when I try to install rev 094. Please note that the repositories very likely contains both versions and I try to install explicitely 3rd version, which might be treated as separate version by DNF? It seems like it can't decide which version to install? May be the good start would be if the error message said not just vim-minimal-2:8.0.094-1.fc26.x86_64 but something like vim-minimal-2:8.0.094-1.fc26.x86_64@commandline or vim-minimal-2:8.0.094-1.fc26.x86_64@fedora to make it clear where the package comes from actually. If you will try to 'testsolv' test case from debugdata -- it will show no conflicts. (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #60) But that suggest to me that the "commandline" repo is not treated properly by DNF. I.e. not all the data are fed to the internal solver. (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #61) > (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #60) > But that suggest to me that the "commandline" repo is not treated properly > by DNF. I.e. not all the data are fed to the internal solver. Yes. * Provides (probably local) are not loaded correctly * Not all rpms loaded into pool. I guess one of these options. it makes me sick - how is a user supposed to work with that stuff and test updates when the package management is broken for a year now? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374925 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398040 [root@testserver:/data]$ ls total 160K -rw-r----- 1 root root 49K 2016-11-29 11:19 pypolicyd-spf-1.3.2-4.fc26.noarch.rpm -rw-r----- 1 root root 49K 2016-11-29 11:19 python2-pyspf-2.0.12-1.fc26.noarch.rpm -rw-r----- 1 root root 53K 2016-11-29 11:19 python3-pyspf-2.0.12-1.fc26.noarch.rpm [root@testserver:/data]$ dnf update *.rpm Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:26 ago on Tue Nov 29 11:21:48 2016. Package python2-pyspf not installed, cannot update it. Package python3-pyspf not installed, cannot update it. Error: nothing provides python3-pyspf needed by pypolicyd-spf-1.3.2-4.fc26.noarch (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) insteresting - "dnf install" seems to know much more about the packages
[root@testserver:/data]$ ls
total 160K
-rw-r----- 1 root root 49K 2016-11-29 11:19 pypolicyd-spf-1.3.2-4.fc26.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 root root 49K 2016-11-29 11:19 python2-pyspf-2.0.12-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
-rw-r----- 1 root root 53K 2016-11-29 11:19 python3-pyspf-2.0.12-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
[root@testserver:/data]$ dnf install *.rpm
Last metadata expiration check: 0:05:37 ago on Tue Nov 29 11:21:48 2016.
Dependencies resolved.
===================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
===================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Installing:
python2-pyspf noarch 2.0.12-1.fc26 @commandline 48 k
replacing python-pyspf.noarch 2.0.11-4.fc24
python3-py3dns noarch 3.0.4-7.fc24 fedora 49 k
python3-pyspf noarch 2.0.12-1.fc26 @commandline 52 k
Upgrading:
pypolicyd-spf noarch 1.3.2-4.fc26 @commandline 48 k
Transaction Summary
===================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Install 3 Packages
Upgrade 1 Package
Total size: 198 k
Total download size: 49 k
Is this ok [y/N]:
I guess that hy_sack_add_cmdline_package should clear considered_uptodate, as a new package is added to the sack. I think that the considered map is too small, leading to access to unallocated memory. Recently we refactored install and upgrade commands and package handling. Please can you try upstream version of dnf-2.0 from our testing repository ("dnf copr enable rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly")? We will be very happy to hear your feedback. Thanks a lot
i fear that stuff is for F25+ - i did not change the fedora version to "rawhide" and there are no machines with F25 planned the next 2-3 months for several reasons [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ dnf copr enable rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly You are about to enable a Copr repository. Please note that this repository is not part of the main Fedora distribution, and quality may vary. The Fedora Project does not exercise any power over the contents of this repository beyond the rules outlined in the Copr FAQ at <https://fedorahosted.org/copr/wiki/UserDocs#WhatIcanbuildinCopr>, and packages are not held to any quality or security level. Please do not file bug reports about these packages in Fedora Bugzilla. In case of problems, contact the owner of this repository. Do you want to continue? [y/N]: y Error: This repository does not have any builds yet so you cannot enable it now. The repo supports Fc24+. Please try it again on Fc24+ system. > Please try it again on Fc24+ system
what was unclear in "and there are no machines with F25 planned the next 2-3 months for several reasons" when this bug was initially reported for F22 and some smart guy thought it's cool to change it to rawhide?
Please try it on fc24 system. In that repo there are available dnf packages as follows: dnf-0:2.0.0_1-33gf0093d6.fc24.noarch dnf-0:2.0.0_1-33gf0093d6.fc24.src dnf-0:2.0.0_1-34g53fb86c.fc24.noarch dnf-0:2.0.0_1-34g53fb86c.fc24.src dnf-0:2.0.0_1-37g4cea33d.fc24.noarch dnf-0:2.0.0_1-37g4cea33d.fc24.src dnf-0:2.0.0_1-40gdb7f88b.fc24.noarch dnf-0:2.0.0_1-40gdb7f88b.fc24.src dnf-0:2.0.0_1-45ga03ea5a.fc24.noarch dnf-0:2.0.0_1-45ga03ea5a.fc24.src dnf-0:2.0.0_1-51g2148ca7.fc24.noarch dnf-0:2.0.0_1-51g2148ca7.fc24.src dnf-0:2.0.0_1-59gaa9ebc1.fc24.noarch dnf-0:2.0.0_1-59gaa9ebc1.fc24.src Last versions of DNF-2.0 contain unification of local package handling with packages from repo, therefore there shouldn't be any differences according to package source. Please try it on fc24 system that is the oldest supported fedora. Your experience with latest upstream version is critical for further dnf tuning and development. Thanks a lot for your time and feedback. > In that repo
well, you missed to mention "that" repo
and now it would be a good time to test something since dnf refuses to update the bind packages downloaded from koji while with "yum-deprecated" already deployed on the secondary production nameservers, primary follows tomorrow when there are no issues [root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ ls total 3.7M -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 1.9M 2017-01-12 19:30 bind-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 91K 2017-01-12 19:30 bind-chroot-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 152K 2017-01-12 19:30 bind-libs-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 1.1M 2017-01-12 19:30 bind-libs-lite-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 89K 2017-01-12 19:30 bind-license-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.noarch.rpm -rw-r----- 1 harry verwaltung 407K 2017-01-12 19:30 bind-utils-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64.rpm [root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm rhsoft-repo for fedora 8.1 MB/s | 244 kB 00:00 rhsoft-repo with generic rpms 127 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:00 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:11 ago on Thu Jan 12 19:37:29 2017. Error: nothing provides bind-libs(x86-64) = 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 needed by bind-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64. package bind-libs-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 is not installable. package bind-libs-lite-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 is not installable. package bind-license-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.noarch is not installable. package bind-utils-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 is not installable. nothing provides bind-libs(x86-64) = 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 needed by bind-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) [root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ dnf update *.rpm Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:30 ago on Thu Jan 12 19:37:29 2017. Error: nothing provides bind-libs(x86-64) = 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 needed by bind-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64. package bind-libs-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 is not installable. package bind-libs-lite-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 is not installable. package bind-license-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.noarch is not installable. package bind-utils-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 is not installable. nothing provides bind-libs(x86-64) = 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 needed by bind-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) There is a pull-requested that represent solution recommended by Michael Schröder in commend 65 , but I still have a problem to reproduce original issue. and what doe sthat mean in context of "Please try it on fc24 system. In that repo there are available dnf packages as follows" - *where* are the packages for F24? "problem to reproduce original issue" - well, just get a F24 machine install the bind packages above in lower version, download the fresh builds from koji and try "dnf update *.rpm" - that don#t always happen in every combination and hence i am really annoyed by the unpreditability of the new proposed package manager for longer than a year while the old one just works fine as it did the past 10 years I am sorry, still I cannot reproduce your problem using your data. Please can you compare outputs and probably you can tell me difference. Thanks a lot. $rpm -q bind bind-chroot bind-libs bind-libs-lite bind-license bind-utils rpm dnf libdnf bind-9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 bind-chroot-9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 bind-libs-9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 bind-libs-lite-9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 bind-license-9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.noarch bind-utils-9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 rpm-4.13.0_alpha-443g979d52b.fc24.x86_64 dnf-2.0.0_1-59gaa9ebc1.fc24.noarch libdnf-0.7.1-2gfe5a08b.fc24.x86_64 $ ls bind-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64.rpm bind-chroot-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64.rpm bind-libs-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64.rpm bind-libs-lite-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64.rpm bind-license-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.noarch.rpm bind-utils-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64.rpm $ sudo dnf upgrade *.rpm Last metadata expiration check: 0:46:20 ago on Fri Jan 13 08:59:12 2017 CET. Dependencies resolved. =========================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =========================================================================== Upgrading: bind x86_64 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 @commandline 1.9 M bind-chroot x86_64 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 @commandline 90 k bind-libs x86_64 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 @commandline 152 k bind-libs-lite x86_64 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 @commandline 1.0 M bind-license noarch 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 @commandline 89 k bind-utils x86_64 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 @commandline 406 k Transaction Summary =========================================================================== Upgrade 6 Packages Total size: 3.7 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded. Running transaction Upgrading : bind-license-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.noarch 1/12 Upgrading : bind-libs-lite-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 2/12 Upgrading : bind-libs-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 3/12 Upgrading : bind-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 4/12 Upgrading : bind-chroot-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 5/12 Upgrading : bind-utils-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 6/12 Cleanup : bind-chroot-32:9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 7/12 Cleanup : bind-32:9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 8/12 Cleanup : bind-utils-32:9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 9/12 Cleanup : bind-libs-lite-32:9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 10/12 Cleanup : bind-libs-32:9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 11/12 Cleanup : bind-license-32:9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.noarch 12/12 Verifying : bind-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 1/12 Verifying : bind-libs-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 2/12 Verifying : bind-libs-lite-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 3/12 Verifying : bind-license-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.noarch 4/12 Verifying : bind-chroot-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 5/12 Verifying : bind-utils-32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 6/12 Verifying : bind-32:9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 7/12 Verifying : bind-chroot-32:9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 8/12 Verifying : bind-libs-32:9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 9/12 Verifying : bind-libs-lite-32:9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 10/12 Verifying : bind-license-32:9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.noarch 11/12 Verifying : bind-utils-32:9.10.4-1.P1.fc24.x86_64 12/12 Upgraded: bind.x86_64 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 bind-chroot.x86_64 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 bind-libs.x86_64 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 bind-libs-lite.x86_64 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 bind-license.noarch 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 bind-utils.x86_64 32:9.10.4-3.P5.fc24 Complete! $ rpm -q bind bind-chroot bind-libs bind-libs-lite bind-license bind-utils rpm dnf libdnf bind-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 bind-chroot-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 bind-libs-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 bind-libs-lite-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 bind-license-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.noarch bind-utils-9.10.4-3.P5.fc24.x86_64 rpm-4.13.0_alpha-443g979d52b.fc24.x86_64 dnf-2.0.0_1-59gaa9ebc1.fc24.noarch libdnf-0.7.1-2gfe5a08b.fc24.x86_64 that's what "non deterministically" describes however, would you please add the missing infos about which repo you are talking in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888#c70 I am talking about this repo: dnf copr enable rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly .repo file contains: [rpmsoftwaremanagement-dnf-nightly] name=Copr repo for dnf-nightly owned by rpmsoftwaremanagement baseurl=https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly/fedora-$releasever-$basearch/ type=rpm-md skip_if_unavailable=True gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly/pubkey.gpg repo_gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 enabled_metadata=1 Additionally I tested it on VM with: rpm-4.13.0_alpha-487gd1c988b.fc24.x86_64 dnf-2.0.0_1-59gaa9ebc1.fc24.noarch libdnf-0.7.1-2gfe5a08b.fc24.x86_64 libsolv-0.6.24-15g50fc549.fc24.x86_64 python2-dnf-2.0.0_1-59gaa9ebc1.fc24.noarch python3-dnf-2.0.0_1-59gaa9ebc1.fc24.noarch It works like expected. I downgrade it as much as possible and it was working also. Probably can you try "dnf check" command? Or --allowerasing option with upgrade command, just to see what happens. Or as attachment output from 'rpm -qa', or system specification, like free memory on that system. (In reply to Jaroslav Mracek from comment #77) > It works like expected. I downgrade it as much as possible and it was > working also. I wasn't able to find some steps which would reproduce it in 100% of cases. Though I don't think it's related to DNF itself, I suppose libdnf. > > Probably can you try "dnf check" command? > > Or --allowerasing option with upgrade command, just to see what happens. Absolutely nothing, same results. > > Or as attachment output from 'rpm -qa', or system specification, like free > memory on that system. That's not related. Created attachment 1240283 [details]
rpm -qa
list of installed packages attached
memory can't be the problem
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ free
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 31G 4,2G 1,1G 324M 25G 26G
Swap: 1,1G 110M 1,0G
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ dnf check
No such command: check. Please use /usr/bin/dnf --help
You need to install dnf-2.0 from this repo: dnf copr enable rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly .repo file contains: [rpmsoftwaremanagement-dnf-nightly] name=Copr repo for dnf-nightly owned by rpmsoftwaremanagement baseurl=https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly/fedora-$releasever-$basearch/ type=rpm-md skip_if_unavailable=True gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly/pubkey.gpg repo_gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 enabled_metadata=1 Then: # dnf upgrade dnf Or: # dnf upgrade And then perform tests again (dnf upgrade *.rpm), check command (dnf check) and so on. Thanks a lot as you can see at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888#c67 the command does not work, anyways, i created the repofile manually and once again you need yum-deprectated to get a useful output compared with the horrible mess "dnf --enablerepo dnf-nightly upgrade dnf" below there are missing some Provides/Obsoletes "lounge-rhsoft-workstation" is nohting else than a meta-package defining dependencies so that i can safely remove anything listet by "dnf leaves" _______________________________________________________ Error: Package: lounge-rhsoft-workstation-24.0-10.fc24.20161203.rh.noarch (installed) Requires: dnf-plugins-extras Removing: dnf-plugins-extras-0.0.12-3.fc24.noarch (installed) dnf-plugins-extras = 0.0.12-3.fc24 Obsoleted By: dnf-plugins-extras-common-data-0.10.0_rc1-9g056b23c.fc24.noarch (dnf-nightly) Not found Updated By: dnf-plugins-extras-0.0.12-76gb69f9ca.fc24.noarch (dnf-nightly) dnf-plugins-extras = 0.0.12-76gb69f9ca.fc24 Available: dnf-plugins-extras-0.0.12-2.fc24.noarch (fedora) dnf-plugins-extras = 0.0.12-2.fc24 _______________________________________________________ [root@srv-rhsoft:/etc/yum.repos.d]$ dnf --enablerepo dnf-nightly upgrade dnf Copr repo for dnf-nightly owned by rpmsoftwaremanagement 156 kB/s | 288 kB 00:01 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:11 ago on Fri Jan 13 11:12:50 2017. Dependencies resolved. =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): at x86_64 3.1.18-1.fc24 fedora 71 k dnf noarch 2.0.0_1-66ga24f756.fc24 dnf-nightly 252 k dnf-conf noarch 2.0.0_1-66ga24f756.fc24 dnf-nightly 27 k dnf-plugins-core noarch 1.0.0_0.rc1.1-3g09133ec.fc24 dnf-nightly 13 k dnf-plugins-extras-common-data noarch 0.10.0_rc1-9g056b23c.fc24 dnf-nightly 68 k dnf-yum noarch 2.0.0_1-66ga24f756.fc24 dnf-nightly 9.2 k ed x86_64 1.12-2.fc24 fedora 77 k httrack x86_64 3.48.22-1.fc24 fedora 1.0 M libcomps x86_64 0.1.8-3g01a4759.fc24 dnf-nightly 70 k libdnet x86_64 1.12-17.fc24 fedora 35 k libdnf x86_64 0.7.1-2gfe5a08b.fc24 dnf-nightly 120 k libpng12 x86_64 1.2.56-2.fc24 fedora 156 k librepo x86_64 1.7.20-2ge1137cb.fc24 dnf-nightly 73 k lounge-arrakis noarch 24.0-3.fc24.20161003.rh rhsoft-fedora 6.5 k lounge-multimedia noarch 24.0-1.fc24.20161003.rh rhsoft-fedora 5.8 k lounge-nameserver noarch 24.0-3.fc24.20161003.rh rhsoft-fedora 5.9 k mailgraph noarch 1.14-27.fc24 updates 32 k ncurses-compat-libs x86_64 6.0-6.20160709.fc24 updates 302 k open-vm-tools x86_64 10.0.5.3227872-3.fc24.20161003.rh rhsoft-fedora 586 k perl-Algorithm-Diff noarch 1.1903-4.fc24 fedora 51 k perl-AppConfig noarch 1.71-4.fc24 fedora 86 k perl-Archive-Tar noarch 2.06-2.fc24 updates 76 k perl-Archive-Zip noarch 1.58-1.fc24 updates 106 k perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope noarch 0.20-1.fc24 fedora 40 k perl-B-Lint noarch 1.20-6.fc24 fedora 24 k perl-CPAN noarch 2.11-350.fc24 updates-testing 548 k perl-CPAN-Meta noarch 2.150005-3.fc24 fedora 173 k perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements noarch 2.140-2.fc24 fedora 36 k perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML noarch 0.018-2.fc24 fedora 32 k perl-Class-Accessor noarch 0.34-19.fc24 fedora 32 k perl-Class-Accessor-Chained noarch 0.01-27.fc24 fedora 17 k perl-Class-Factory-Util noarch 1.7-22.fc24 fedora 22 k perl-Class-ISA noarch 0.36-1017.fc24 fedora 14 k perl-Class-Inspector noarch 1.31-2.fc24 updates 34 k perl-Class-Load noarch 0.23-2.fc24 fedora 35 k perl-Class-Singleton noarch 1.5-4.fc24 fedora 22 k perl-Class-Std-Fast noarch 0.0.8-14.fc24.20161003.rh rhsoft-fedora 17 k perl-Compress-Bzip2 x86_64 2.25-1.fc24 updates 69 k perl-Convert-BinHex noarch 1.125-2.fc24 fedora 48 k perl-Data-OptList noarch 0.110-1.fc24 fedora 30 k perl-Data-Section noarch 0.200006-6.fc24 fedora 28 k perl-Date-ISO8601 noarch 0.004-13.fc24 fedora 21 k perl-DateTime x86_64 2:1.28-2.fc24 updates 132 k perl-DateTime-Format-Builder noarch 0.8100-9.fc24 fedora 82 k perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601 noarch 0.08-11.fc24 fedora 31 k perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime noarch 1:1.68-1.fc24 fedora 41 k perl-DateTime-Locale noarch 1.03-1.fc24 fedora 2.1 M perl-DateTime-TimeZone noarch 2.01-6.fc24 updates 410 k perl-DateTime-TimeZone-SystemV noarch 0.009-6.fc24 fedora 25 k perl-DateTime-TimeZone-Tzfile noarch 0.010-4.fc24 fedora 22 k perl-Devel-Size x86_64 0.80-4.fc24 fedora 45 k perl-Dist-CheckConflicts noarch 0.11-6.fc24 fedora 26 k perl-Email-Date-Format noarch 1.005-4.fc24 fedora 21 k perl-Email-Valid noarch 1.200-1.fc24 fedora 26 k perl-Env noarch 1.04-347.fc24 fedora 20 k perl-Exporter-Tiny noarch 0.042-5.fc24 fedora 41 k perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder noarch 1:0.280224-2.fc24 fedora 47 k perl-ExtUtils-Command noarch 7.10-5.fc24 updates 17 k perl-ExtUtils-Install noarch 2.04-348.fc24 fedora 45 k perl-ExtUtils-MM-Utils noarch 7.10-5.fc24 updates 15 k perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker noarch 7.10-5.fc24 updates 279 k perl-ExtUtils-Manifest noarch 1.70-347.fc24 fedora 36 k perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS noarch 1:3.30-3.fc24 updates 81 k perl-File-CheckTree noarch 4.42-296.fc24 fedora 22 k perl-File-HomeDir noarch 1.00-11.fc24 fedora 61 k perl-File-Tail noarch 1.3-2.fc24 fedora 29 k perl-File-Which noarch 1.21-1.fc24 fedora 23 k perl-IO-SessionData noarch 1.03-6.fc24 fedora 13 k perl-IO-Zlib noarch 1:1.10-365.fc24 updates 67 k perl-IPC-Cmd noarch 1:0.96-1.fc24 updates 41 k perl-IPC-System-Simple noarch 1.25-8.fc24 fedora 41 k perl-Image-Base noarch 1.17-5.fc24 fedora 26 k perl-Image-Info noarch 1.38-6.fc24 updates 86 k perl-Image-Xbm noarch 1.09-2.fc24 fedora 22 k perl-Image-Xpm noarch 1.12-4.fc24 fedora 23 k perl-LWP-Protocol-https noarch 6.06-7.fc24 fedora 16 k perl-List-MoreUtils x86_64 0.415-1.fc24 fedora 78 k perl-Locale-Codes noarch 3.42-1.fc24 updates 300 k perl-Locale-Maketext noarch 1.26-349.fc24 updates 95 k perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple noarch 1:0.21-365.fc24 updates 66 k perl-MIME-Lite noarch 3.030-6.fc24 fedora 100 k perl-MIME-Types noarch 2.13-1.fc24 fedora 69 k perl-MIME-tools noarch 5.507-3.fc24 fedora 247 k perl-MRO-Compat noarch 0.12-10.fc24 fedora 23 k perl-MailTools noarch 2.18-1.fc24 fedora 107 k perl-Module-Build noarch 2:0.42.18-1.fc24 fedora 271 k perl-Module-CoreList noarch 1:5.20161220-1.fc24 updates-testing 77 k perl-Module-Implementation noarch 0.09-6.fc24 fedora 22 k perl-Module-Load noarch 1:0.32-347.fc24 fedora 18 k perl-Module-Load-Conditional noarch 0.68-1.fc24 updates 24 k perl-Module-Metadata noarch 1.000027-4.fc24 fedora 40 k perl-Module-Pluggable noarch 2:5.2-2.fc24 fedora 33 k perl-Module-Runtime noarch 0.014-7.fc24 fedora 24 k perl-Mozilla-CA noarch 20160104-2.fc24 fedora 14 k perl-Net-DRI noarch 0.96_09-3.fc24.20161003.rh rhsoft-fedora 516 k perl-Net-Ping noarch 2.43-365.fc24 updates 82 k perl-Net-SMTP-SSL noarch 1.03-2.fc24 fedora 14 k perl-Package-DeprecationManager noarch 0.16-1.fc24 fedora 27 k perl-Package-Generator noarch 1.106-6.fc24 fedora 26 k perl-Package-Stash noarch 0.37-4.fc24 fedora 41 k perl-Package-Stash-XS x86_64 0.28-9.fc24 fedora 36 k perl-Params-Check noarch 1:0.38-347.fc24 fedora 22 k perl-Params-Classify x86_64 0.013-15.fc24 fedora 32 k perl-Params-Util x86_64 1.07-15.fc24 fedora 42 k perl-Params-Validate x86_64 1.26-1.fc24 updates 75 k perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta noarch 1:1.4417-3.fc24 fedora 30 k perl-Perl-OSType noarch 1.009-2.fc24 fedora 27 k perl-Pod-Checker noarch 4:1.71-6.fc24 fedora 31 k perl-Pod-Html noarch 1.22-365.fc24 updates 74 k perl-Pod-LaTeX noarch 0.61-297.fc24 fedora 40 k perl-Pod-POM noarch 2.01-3.fc24 fedora 97 k perl-Pod-Plainer noarch 1.04-2.fc24 fedora 13 k perl-SOAP-Lite noarch 1.20-1.fc24 updates 290 k perl-SOAP-WSDL noarch 3.003-2.fc24.20161003.rh rhsoft-fedora 182 k perl-Software-License noarch 0.103012-1.fc24 fedora 129 k perl-Sub-Exporter noarch 0.987-8.fc24 fedora 72 k perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive noarch 0.001011-6.fc24 fedora 17 k perl-Sub-Identify x86_64 0.12-2.fc24 fedora 26 k perl-Sub-Install noarch 0.928-7.fc24 fedora 26 k perl-Sub-Name x86_64 0.15-1.fc24 fedora 32 k perl-Template-Toolkit x86_64 2.26-4.fc24 fedora 1.4 M perl-Test noarch 1.26-365.fc24 updates 76 k perl-Test-Harness noarch 3.36-3.fc24 updates 276 k perl-Test-Simple noarch 1.001014-347.fc24 fedora 203 k perl-Text-Diff noarch 1.44-1.fc24 fedora 44 k perl-Text-Glob noarch 0.09-15.fc24 fedora 16 k perl-Text-Template noarch 1.46-4.fc24 fedora 67 k perl-Try-Tiny noarch 0.24-2.fc24 fedora 41 k perl-Variable-Magic x86_64 0.59-2.fc24 fedora 56 k perl-XML-LibXML x86_64 1:2.0128-1.fc24 updates 366 k perl-XML-Parser x86_64 2.44-4.fc24 fedora 224 k perl-XML-SAX noarch 0.99-16.fc24 fedora 64 k perl-XML-Simple noarch 2.22-2.fc24 fedora 85 k perl-XMLRPC-Lite noarch 0.717-6.fc24 fedora 32 k perl-autodie noarch 2.29-2.fc24 fedora 97 k perl-inc-latest noarch 2:0.500-4.fc24 fedora 24 k perl-local-lib noarch 2.000018-2.fc24 fedora 72 k perl-namespace-autoclean noarch 0.28-2.fc24 fedora 30 k perl-namespace-clean noarch 0.26-2.fc24 fedora 35 k perl-version x86_64 5:0.99.17-1.fc24 updates 96 k php-pdo x86_64 7.1.1-1.0.fc24.20170110.1541.rh.sandybridge rhsoft-fedora 91 k python3-dnf noarch 2.0.0_1-66ga24f756.fc24 dnf-nightly 405 k python3-dnf-plugins-core noarch 1.0.0_0.rc1.1-3g09133ec.fc24 dnf-nightly 71 k python3-dnf-plugins-extras-common noarch 0.10.0_rc1-9g056b23c.fc24 dnf-nightly 9.7 k python3-dnf-plugins-extras-leaves noarch 0.10.0_rc1-9g056b23c.fc24 dnf-nightly 11 k python3-dnf-plugins-extras-repomanage noarch 0.10.0_rc1-9g056b23c.fc24 dnf-nightly 12 k python3-dnf-plugins-extras-show-leaves noarch 0.10.0_rc1-9g056b23c.fc24 dnf-nightly 9.7 k python3-hawkey x86_64 0.7.1-2gfe5a08b.fc24 dnf-nightly 50 k python3-libcomps x86_64 0.1.8-3g01a4759.fc24 dnf-nightly 42 k python3-librepo x86_64 1.7.20-2ge1137cb.fc24 dnf-nightly 42 k qt3 x86_64 3.3.8b-67.fc24 fedora 3.4 M redhat-lsb x86_64 4.1-33.fc24 updates 28 k redhat-lsb-core x86_64 4.1-33.fc24 updates 42 k redhat-lsb-cxx x86_64 4.1-33.fc24 updates 20 k redhat-lsb-desktop x86_64 4.1-33.fc24 updates 24 k redhat-lsb-languages x86_64 4.1-33.fc24 updates 22 k redhat-lsb-printing x86_64 4.1-33.fc24 updates 20 k redhat-lsb-submod-multimedia x86_64 4.1-33.fc24 updates 19 k redhat-lsb-submod-security x86_64 4.1-33.fc24 updates 19 k roundcubemail noarch 2:1.2.3-2.fc24.20161129.rh rhsoft-fedora 3.4 M spax x86_64 1.5.3-6.fc24 fedora 213 k up-imapproxy x86_64 1.2.8-6.fc24.20161012.rh rhsoft-fedora 37 k util-linux-user x86_64 2.28.2-1.fc24 updates 90 k Transaction Summary =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Skip 163 Packages Nothing to do. Complete! Ok, please try 'dnf --allowerasing --enablerepo dnf-nightly upgrade dnf' or 'dnf --allowerasing --best --enablerepo dnf-nightly upgrade dnf' I am sure that you will like the dnf-2.0. Many fixes are there and only there including many new features. "--allowerasing --best" would remove the metapackage which is luckily protected and stop, do you really think that i did not try that?
as said there are missing Provides/Obsoletes
Error: Package: lounge-rhsoft-workstation-24.0-10.fc24.20161203.rh.noarch (installed)
Requires: dnf-plugins-extras
Removing: dnf-plugins-extras-0.0.12-3.fc24.noarch (installed)
dnf-plugins-extras = 0.0.12-3.fc24
Obsoleted By: dnf-plugins-extras-common-data-0.10.0_rc1-9g056b23c.fc24.noarch (dnf-nightly)
Not found
Updated By: dnf-plugins-extras-0.0.12-76gb69f9ca.fc24.noarch (dnf-nightly)
dnf-plugins-extras = 0.0.12-76gb69f9ca.fc24
Available: dnf-plugins-extras-0.0.12-2.fc24.noarch (fedora)
dnf-plugins-extras = 0.0.12-2.fc24
The problem with provides we are going to fix in pull-request: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf-plugins-extras/pull/80 Created attachment 1240376 [details]
dnf-extras that should be installable
Please can you try to update system with provided rpms of extras. It should help to overcome the problem with dnf-plugins-extras provides
that are F25 packages and i doubt that it works well update one piece manually and after that try to get the rest from the repo - that packages belong to the nightly repos in their F24 incarnation Created attachment 1240395 [details]
Fc24 extras
Sorry for previous build for Fc25. This one is for Fc24. The rest of related packages should be installed from repos as you mentioned. I try to get clue whats wrong as fast as it is possible.
frankly how do you imagine to solve that chicken-egg-problem installing packages from the attachment and what is the problem not be able to add them to the repo in the last few days?
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads/extras-fc24]$ rpm -Uvh python3-dnf-plugins-extras-show-leaves-0.10.0-1.git.283.dda3720.fc24.noarch.rpm python3-dnf-plugins-extras-common-0.10.0-1.git.283.dda3720.fc24.noarch.rpm python3-dnf-plugins-extras-repomanage-0.10.0-1.git.283.dda3720.fc24.noarch.rpm dnf-plugins-extras-common-data-0.10.0-1.git.283.dda3720.fc24.noarch.rpm python3-dnf-plugins-extras-leaves-0.10.0-1.git.283.dda3720.fc24.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
python3-dnf >= 2.0 is needed by python3-dnf-plugins-extras-common-0.10.0-1.git.283.dda3720.fc24.noarch
OK, using the old dnf was in that case able to solve the deps and it also looks like the new one was at least able to update the bind-packages from donwloads-folder anyways, the repo should be complete! dnf --enablerepo=dnf-nightly install python3-dnf-plugins-extras-show-leaves-0.10.0-1.git.283.dda3720.fc24.noarch.rpm python3-dnf-plugins-extras-common-0.10.0-1.git.283.dda3720.fc24.noarch.rpm python3-dnf-plugins-extras-repomanage-0.10.0-1.git.283.dda3720.fc24.noarch.rpm dnf-plugins-extras-common-data-0.10.0-1.git.283.dda3720.fc24.noarch.rpm python3-dnf-plugins-extras-leaves-0.10.0-1.git.283.dda3720.fc24.noarch.rpm but it looks like it's better not leave the repo enabled since there are still broken deps including rpm-python3 and install a rpm-4.13.0_alpha-489g1949aaa.fc24 is scary
[root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ dnf upgrade
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Mon Jan 16 14:40:57 2017 CET.
[master f5d1a5f] saving uncommitted changes in /etc prior to yum run
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Dependencies resolved.
===================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
===================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Upgrading:
bind99-libs x86_64 9.9.9-4.P5.fc24 updates-testing 670 k
bind99-license noarch 9.9.9-4.P5.fc24 updates-testing 12 k
createrepo_c x86_64 0.10.0-40g748891f.fc24 dnf-nightly 58 k
createrepo_c-libs x86_64 0.10.0-40g748891f.fc24 dnf-nightly 84 k
libsolv x86_64 0.6.24-15g50fc549.fc24 dnf-nightly 351 k
rpm x86_64 4.13.0_alpha-489g1949aaa.fc24 dnf-nightly 468 k
rpm-build-libs x86_64 4.13.0_alpha-489g1949aaa.fc24 dnf-nightly 81 k
rpm-libs x86_64 4.13.0_alpha-489g1949aaa.fc24 dnf-nightly 263 k
rpm-plugin-selinux x86_64 4.13.0_alpha-489g1949aaa.fc24 dnf-nightly 12 k
rpm-plugin-systemd-inhibit x86_64 4.13.0_alpha-489g1949aaa.fc24 dnf-nightly 12 k
Installing dependencies:
python2-rpm x86_64 4.13.0_alpha-489g1949aaa.fc24 dnf-nightly 61 k
replacing rpm-python.x86_64 4.13.0-1.fc24
python3-rpm x86_64 4.13.0_alpha-489g1949aaa.fc24 dnf-nightly 61 k
replacing rpm-python3.x86_64 4.13.0-1.fc24
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
dnf-plugins-extras-common-data noarch 0.10.0_rc1-9g056b23c.fc24 dnf-nightly 68 k
python3-dnf-plugins-extras-common noarch 0.10.0_rc1-9g056b23c.fc24 dnf-nightly 9.7 k
python3-dnf-plugins-extras-leaves noarch 0.10.0_rc1-9g056b23c.fc24 dnf-nightly 11 k
python3-dnf-plugins-extras-repomanage noarch 0.10.0_rc1-9g056b23c.fc24 dnf-nightly 12 k
python3-dnf-plugins-extras-show-leaves noarch 0.10.0_rc1-9g056b23c.fc24 dnf-nightly 9.7 k
rpm-python x86_64 4.13.0_alpha-253g9571218.fc24 dnf-nightly 59 k
rpm-python3 x86_64 4.13.0_alpha-253g9571218.fc24 dnf-nightly 59 k
Transaction Summary
===================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Install 2 Packages
Upgrade 10 Packages
Skip 7 Packages
Total download size: 2.1 M
Is this ok [y/N]:
and it don't really work proper first "dnf upgrade" on my second machien showed some updates in know they are there, solved deps and than spit out a ton of xml errors - after "rm -rf /var/cache/dnf/*" repeatly repos disabled and no mentioning why dnf2 still don't report the reasons *why* dependencies can not be solved and only list affected packages - i want my times back where the package manager was a solid base on Fedora and talked clearly what are the problems [root@rh:~]$ dnf upgrade Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:13 ago on Mon Jan 16 14:54:29 2017 CET. Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora', disabling. Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates-testing', disabling. Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates', disabling. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! [root@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ dnf upgrade Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Mon Jan 16 14:57:33 2017 CET. Dependencies resolved. =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Upgrading: bind99-libs x86_64 9.9.9-4.P5.fc24 updates-testing 670 k bind99-license noarch 9.9.9-4.P5.fc24 updates-testing 12 k Transaction Summary =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Upgrade 2 Packages Total download size: 682 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: [MIRROR] bind99-libs-9.9.9-4.P5.fc24.x86_64.rpm: Curl error (6): Couldn't resolve host name for http://<metalink version="3.0" xmlns="http://www.metalinker.org/" type="dynamic" pubdate="Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:59:29 GMT" generator="mirrormanager" xmlns:mm0="http://fedorahosted.org/mirrormanager">/b/bind99-libs-9.9.9-4.P5.fc24.x86_64.rpm [Could not resolve host: <metalink version="3.0" xmlns="http] [MIRROR] bind99-license-9.9.9-4.P5.fc24.noarch.rpm: Curl error (6): Couldn't resolve host name for http://<metalink version="3.0" xmlns="http://www.metalinker.org/" type="dynamic" pubdate="Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:59:29 GMT" generator="mirrormanager" xmlns:mm0="http://fedorahosted.org/mirrormanager">/b/bind99-license-9.9.9-4.P5.fc24.noarch.rpm [Could not resolve host: <metalink version="3.0" xmlns="http] [MIRROR] bind99-libs-9.9.9-4.P5.fc24.x86_64.rpm: Curl error (6): Couldn't resolve host name for http://<url protocol="http" type="http" location="CZ" preference="100" >http://mirror.karneval.cz/pub/linux/fedora/ Thanks for the report. I am really sorry but due to problem to reproduce your problem I have to close the bug. Thanks for the report. I am really sorry but due to problem to reproduce your problem I have to close the bug. Thanks for the report. I am really sorry but due to problem to reproduce your problem I have to close the bug. thank you for nothing - hopefully i can downgrade DNF to something working - my feelings for DNF2 and not "I am sure that you will like the dnf-2.0" are the opposite, when i disable all repos with --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=myown it works, as usually DNF don't give any usefull output and so the "INSUFFICIENT_DATA" are because it works like a damned blackbox as it always did while YUM for so many years gave useful informations WHY things are going wrong which where alaways helpful to nail down issues with packages and dependencies DNF is designed for a sunny world not overwhlem the ordianry user with informations while the developers don't get the the ordinary user is not the target the are developing for because the ordianry user typically don't use DNF or YUM at all This is the same reproducer as in comment 59, this time even without mock: 1. dnf --installroot /tmp/rhbz1263888 --releasever 26 --disableplugin=local --setopt=deltarpm=false install @buildsys-build -y 2. dnf --installroot /tmp/rhbz1263888 --releasever 26 --disableplugin=local --setopt=deltarpm=false install https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/vim/8.0.086/1.fc26/x86_64/vim-X11-8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/vim/8.0.086/1.fc26/x86_64/vim-common-8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/vim/8.0.086/1.fc26/x86_64/vim-enhanced-8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/vim/8.0.086/1.fc26/x86_64/vim-filesystem-8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/vim/8.0.086/1.fc26/x86_64/vim-minimal-8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm vim-commentary vim-taglist vim-fugitive vim-nerdtree sudo And it still fails the same way. This time using latest DNF: $ rpm -q dnf dnf-2.0.0_1-69gf8980f8.fc26.noarch The problem described in Comment 97 looks like that libsolv do not take correctly files provides from @commandline repo. I refactored repoquery to accept .rpm and with -l option it shows that vim-minimal-8.0.086-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm has /usr/bin/vi file. I am creating libsolv issue. (Don't bother, it's not a libsolv issue. commandline repos are not special to libsolv.) *** Bug 1414961 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Probably I have found a solution for that: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/pull/243. Michael Schroeder was completely right, the problem was not in libsolv, but in libdnf. Hope that it will help for all cases. (In reply to Harald Reindl from comment #83) > "--allowerasing --best" would remove the metapackage which is luckily > protected and stop, do you really think that i did not try that? > > as said there are missing Provides/Obsoletes > > Error: Package: lounge-rhsoft-workstation-24.0-10.fc24.20161203.rh.noarch > (installed) > Requires: dnf-plugins-extras > Removing: dnf-plugins-extras-0.0.12-3.fc24.noarch (installed) > dnf-plugins-extras = 0.0.12-3.fc24 > Obsoleted By: > dnf-plugins-extras-common-data-0.10.0_rc1-9g056b23c.fc24.noarch (dnf-nightly) > Not found > Updated By: dnf-plugins-extras-0.0.12-76gb69f9ca.fc24.noarch > (dnf-nightly) > dnf-plugins-extras = 0.0.12-76gb69f9ca.fc24 > Available: dnf-plugins-extras-0.0.12-2.fc24.noarch (fedora) > dnf-plugins-extras = 0.0.12-2.fc24 (In reply to Jaroslav Mracek from comment #84) > The problem with provides we are going to fix in pull-request: > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf-plugins-extras/pull/80 FYI in this sub-issue no package currently provides `dnf-plugins-extras` and we will not introduce it again. Any package requiring plugins from extras should require the exact plugins. Please ask devs of such 3rd party packages to change the packaging if you encounter this wrong dependency requirement. Thanks. I AM that 3rd party so what are the *exact* replacements for that and how do you imagine making people happy when you permanently chnage packaging and options? the same for rename options back to "includepkgs" and "excludepkgs" i told you guys that it is a bad idea as you renamed it to "exclude" and "include" for no good reason, but i was blamed with a larg eportion of arrogance to shutup and that you are NDF not YUM now you change it again in the oother direction and each and every admin out tthere needs to revert a previous harmful change again - stop kidding users please > we will not introduce it again
yeah because you are DNF
every other package in the Fedora world would just define a metapackage pulling *all* subpackages as a soft-dep which can be removed and then you could also remove un-needed subpackages without any downsides for the users and 3rd parties
(In reply to Harald Reindl from comment #104) > > we will not introduce it again > > yeah because you are DNF > > every other package in the Fedora world would just define a metapackage > pulling *all* subpackages as a soft-dep which can be removed and then you > could also remove un-needed subpackages without any downsides for the users > and 3rd parties and 1) get it back after update 2) cause lots of problems, because e.g. you don't have FS/setup which supports snapshots (hi snapper plugin) It doesn't make any sense to pull all plugins if 90% of them will just print errors and install ton of useless dependencies. it also don't make sense introduce all the time arbitrary changes forth and back especially when the where flamewars in the past not to intrduce some of that changes from the begin and now after they got sucked and adopted by users change it back where is the documentation what i need to change instead define "dnf-plugins-extras" als requirement to make sure all teh cureently installed features are unchanged present it took long enough the get man yof the yum features back and something like "yum --security update" is still missing another arbitrary change i saw the sohort tinmeframe with the broken DNF2.0 on 24 the script below was no longer quite and asked for something spitting a "Y" every day in a cron mail - in the past the same script with YUM used --security on production servers - viola cron mails only if there are new scurity updates, worked like a charm for years and since "yum-deprecated" even if called explicit warns about deprecation of yum no longer useable [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /etc/cron.daily/check-updates.cron #!/bin/bash yum_output=`LANG=C; /usr/bin/dnf -q check-update` echo $yum_output | xargs | sed 's/ updates//g' | tr -d '\n' (In reply to Harald Reindl from comment #106) While you have my sympathy, could you please stick to the topic please? back to topic? give me a relieable package manager as it was before F22 NOW because it's long enough that we have to deal with the pre-alpha in GA releases (In reply to Harald Reindl from comment #103) > I AM that 3rd party > > so what are the *exact* replacements for that If you are calling plugins from bash then: `Requires: dnf-command(<nameofplugincommand>)` [1] If you require passive plugin (unlikely) then: `Requires: dnf-plugins-extras-<nameofplugin>` If it's calling Python API then: `Requires: python[23]-dnf-plugins-extras-<nameofplugin>` > and how do you imagine making > people happy when you permanently chnage packaging and options? > > the same for rename options back to "includepkgs" and "excludepkgs" > ... > i told you guys that it is a bad idea as you renamed it to "exclude" and > "include" for no good reason, but i was blamed with a larg eportion of > arrogance to shutup and that you are NDF not YUM > > now you change it again in the oother direction and each and every admin out > tthere needs to revert a previous harmful change again - stop kidding users > please we have at least tried to make it as much as compatible as before in DNF-1 so `include` should still work. This all was part of bigger change in DNF-2.0. I am sorry for issues but these intentional changes were done for making DNF compatible with yum (when the compatibility was broken). It was done at once to don't change DNF behaviour or API in following years. [1] http://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command_ref.html#description I'm reading this ticket because I came across this in the folloing manner trying to test a new build of chromium At the date of this ticket, and on F25, the current chromium version is: chromium.x86_64 55.0.2883.87-1.fc25 The advisory for the 56 update is: FEDORA-2017-583538ec31 mkdir chromium56_update && cd chromium56_update bodhi -D chromium-56.0.2924.87-3.fc25 I'm reading this ticket because I came across this in the folloing manner trying to test a new build of chromium At the date of this ticket, and on F25, the current chromium version is: chromium.x86_64 55.0.2883.87-1.fc25 The advisory for the 56 update is: FEDORA-2017-583538ec31 mkdir chromium56_update && cd chromium56_update bodhi -D chromium-56.0.2924.87-3.fc25 sudo dnf upgrade ./*.rpm Yeilds: Last metadata expiration check: 2:42:53 ago on Fri Feb 24 10:23:36 2017. Package chromedriver not installed, cannot update it. Package chrome-remote-desktop not installed, cannot update it. Package chromium-native_client not installed, cannot update it. Error: package chromium-56.0.2924.87-3.fc25.x86_64 is disabled. package chromium-libs-56.0.2924.87-3.fc25.x86_64 is disabled. package chromium-libs-media-56.0.2924.87-3.fc25.x86_64 is disabled (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) Fallback is to install what you need with rpm instead sudo rpm -Uvh chromium-56.0.2924.87-3.fc25.x86_64.rpm chromium-libs-*.rpm Preparing... ################################# [100%] Updating / installing... 1:chromium-libs-media-56.0.2924.87-################################# [ 17%] 2:chromium-libs-56.0.2924.87-3.fc25################################# [ 33%] 3:chromium-56.0.2924.87-3.fc25 ################################# [ 50%] Cleaning up / removing... 4:chromium-55.0.2883.87-1.fc25 ################################# [ 67%] 5:chromium-libs-55.0.2883.87-1.fc25################################# [ 83%] 6:chromium-libs-media-55.0.2883.87-################################# [100%] Which suceeds. If you then downgrade chromium back to what's currently in Fedora (55) and try the same process over again, it now resolves: sudo dnf upgrade ./*.rpm [sudo] password for xenith: Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:40 ago on Fri Feb 24 13:25:24 2017. Package chromedriver not installed, cannot update it. Package chrome-remote-desktop not installed, cannot update it. Package chromium-native_client not installed, cannot update it. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================================================= Upgrading: chromium x86_64 56.0.2924.87-3.fc25 @commandline 42 M chromium-libs x86_64 56.0.2924.87-3.fc25 @commandline 47 M chromium-libs-media x86_64 56.0.2924.87-3.fc25 @commandline 1.5 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================================================= Upgrade 3 Packages Total size: 90 M wth? The command 'dnf upgrade' cannot be used for packages that are not installed. From your report we cannot see your version of dnf and libdnf and what behavior you expect. I also think that it is not related to the bug report. The problem in this bug was solved in libdnf and how to get upstream version can be found in Comment 66. So far from presented information I don't see the behavior as a bug. They were installed, sorry if I wasn't clear about that but I started off with Chromium 55 installed as normal. You can clearly see the difference in behavior between before the packages have been installed, and after they have been downgraded and the same command is run (i.e. It then resolves correctly.) Same command. It is a bug. Since nobody has Chromium 56 installed since it's not in testing yet, try it right now with an up-to-date system. You have until 56 makes it into stable, but to answer your question about me I'm fully up-to-date with -testing enabled. Mike, please try try dnf -2.1.0 from our repository and if any problem appear, please report it in new bug report with version of dnf, libdnf (or hawkey) and libsolv. Thanks a lot This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle. Changing version to '26'. The problem was fixed in libdnf-0.7.4 released into rawhide F25's dnf doesn't use libdnf, so F25 is still affected. Any chance of backporting? (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #118) > F25's dnf doesn't use libdnf, so F25 is still affected. Any chance of > backporting? F25's dnf uses hawkey. I think it's possible to backport, but DNF 1.x gets fixes for critical and security issues. So, patches are welcomed. I create PR for hawkey (https://github.com/rpm-software-management/hawkey/pull/122), please can you Igor Gnatenko review it. Thanks a lot hawkey-0.6.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ecb76c3686 hawkey-0.6.4-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-59dadb8261 hawkey-0.6.4-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ecb76c3686 hawkey-0.6.4-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-59dadb8261 hawkey-0.6.4-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. hawkey-0.6.4-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. hawkey-0.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64 python3-hawkey-0.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64 nothing changed REMOVE THAT DAMEND WARNING WHEN I EXPLICIT CALL YUM-DEPRECATED I KNOW WHAT I AM DOING AND YOU HAVE NO BUSINESS TO SPIT AROUND IN CRON-MAILS
[root@rh:/downloads]$ yum-deprecated --disablerepo=\* upgrade *.rpm
Yum command has been deprecated, use dnf instead.
___________________________________
what about that idiotic "hawkey-0.6.4-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository" messages when nothing changes?
congratulations for DNF which is "have solution searching problem" when "yum-deprecated just works fine"
root@rh:/downloads]$ dnf --cacheonly upgrade *.rpm
Letzte Prüfung auf abgelaufene Metadaten: vor 2:11:46 am Fri Mar 31 10:09:12 2017.
Fehler: nothing provides libcli-smb-common-samba4.so(SAMBA_4.5.8)(64bit) needed by libsmbclient-2:4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.
nothing provides libreplace-samba4.so(SAMBA_4.5.8)(64bit) needed by libwbclient-2:4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.
package samba-2:4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64 is disabled.
package samba-client-2:4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64 is disabled.
package samba-client-libs-2:4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64 is disabled.
package samba-common-2:4.5.8-0.fc25.noarch is disabled.
package samba-common-libs-2:4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64 is disabled.
package samba-common-tools-2:4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64 is disabled.
package samba-libs-2:4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64 is disabled
(Fügen Sie »--allowerasing« zur Befehlszeile hinzu, um die problematischen Pakete zu ersetzen)
_____________________________
[root@rh:/downloads]$ yum-deprecated --disablerepo=\* upgrade *.rpm
Yum command has been deprecated, use dnf instead.
See 'man dnf' and 'man yum2dnf' for more information.
Geladene Plugins: etckeeper
libsmbclient-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird untersucht: 2:libsmbclient-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64
libsmbclient-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird als eine Aktualisierung für 2:libsmbclient-4.5.7-0.fc25.x86_64 markiert
libwbclient-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird untersucht: 2:libwbclient-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64
libwbclient-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird als eine Aktualisierung für 2:libwbclient-4.5.7-0.fc25.x86_64 markiert
samba-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird untersucht: 2:samba-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64
samba-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird als eine Aktualisierung für 2:samba-4.5.7-0.fc25.x86_64 markiert
samba-client-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird untersucht: 2:samba-client-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64
samba-client-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird als eine Aktualisierung für 2:samba-client-4.5.7-0.fc25.x86_64 markiert
samba-client-libs-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird untersucht: 2:samba-client-libs-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64
samba-client-libs-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird als eine Aktualisierung für 2:samba-client-libs-4.5.7-0.fc25.x86_64 markiert
samba-common-4.5.8-0.fc25.noarch.rpm wird untersucht: 2:samba-common-4.5.8-0.fc25.noarch
samba-common-4.5.8-0.fc25.noarch.rpm wird als eine Aktualisierung für 2:samba-common-4.5.7-0.fc25.noarch markiert
samba-common-libs-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird untersucht: 2:samba-common-libs-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64
samba-common-libs-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird als eine Aktualisierung für 2:samba-common-libs-4.5.7-0.fc25.x86_64 markiert
samba-common-tools-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird untersucht: 2:samba-common-tools-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64
samba-common-tools-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird als eine Aktualisierung für 2:samba-common-tools-4.5.7-0.fc25.x86_64 markiert
samba-libs-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird untersucht: 2:samba-libs-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64
samba-libs-4.5.8-0.fc25.x86_64.rpm wird als eine Aktualisierung für 2:samba-libs-4.5.7-0.fc25.x86_64 markiert
Abhängigkeiten werden aufgelöst
--> Transaktionsprüfung wird ausgeführt
---> Paket libsmbclient.x86_64 2:4.5.7-0.fc25 markiert, um aktualisiert zu werden
---> Paket libsmbclient.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 markiert, um eine Aktualisierung zu werden
---> Paket libwbclient.x86_64 2:4.5.7-0.fc25 markiert, um aktualisiert zu werden
---> Paket libwbclient.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 markiert, um eine Aktualisierung zu werden
---> Paket samba.x86_64 2:4.5.7-0.fc25 markiert, um aktualisiert zu werden
---> Paket samba.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 markiert, um eine Aktualisierung zu werden
---> Paket samba-client.x86_64 2:4.5.7-0.fc25 markiert, um aktualisiert zu werden
---> Paket samba-client.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 markiert, um eine Aktualisierung zu werden
---> Paket samba-client-libs.x86_64 2:4.5.7-0.fc25 markiert, um aktualisiert zu werden
---> Paket samba-client-libs.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 markiert, um eine Aktualisierung zu werden
---> Paket samba-common.noarch 2:4.5.7-0.fc25 markiert, um aktualisiert zu werden
---> Paket samba-common.noarch 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 markiert, um eine Aktualisierung zu werden
---> Paket samba-common-libs.x86_64 2:4.5.7-0.fc25 markiert, um aktualisiert zu werden
---> Paket samba-common-libs.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 markiert, um eine Aktualisierung zu werden
---> Paket samba-common-tools.x86_64 2:4.5.7-0.fc25 markiert, um aktualisiert zu werden
---> Paket samba-common-tools.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 markiert, um eine Aktualisierung zu werden
---> Paket samba-libs.x86_64 2:4.5.7-0.fc25 markiert, um aktualisiert zu werden
---> Paket samba-libs.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 markiert, um eine Aktualisierung zu werden
--> Abhängigkeitsauflösung beendet
--> Finde nicht mehr benötigte Abhängigkeiten
Found and removing 0 unneeded dependencies
Aktualisiert:
libsmbclient.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 libwbclient.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 samba.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 samba-client.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 samba-client-libs.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25
samba-common.noarch 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 samba-common-libs.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 samba-common-tools.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25 samba-libs.x86_64 2:4.5.8-0.fc25
Komplett!
|