Bug 907398 (sigil-07)

Summary: sigil-0.7.3 is available
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring>
Component: sigilAssignee: Dan Horák <dan>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: alejandronova, dan, hdegoede, znmeb
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-09-22 23:58:52 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 878188, 915005, 915006, 915920, 915923, 1006254    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Upstream Release Monitoring 2013-02-04 09:45:54 UTC
Latest upstream release: 0.6.901
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.6.2
URL: http://code.google.com/p/sigil/downloads/list

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Comment 1 Dan Horák 2013-02-12 17:39:46 UTC
*** Bug 909936 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Dan Horák 2013-02-18 08:53:15 UTC
*** Bug 912109 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Dan Horák 2013-03-05 18:57:21 UTC
*** Bug 917632 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Hans de Goede 2013-03-06 11:55:57 UTC
Dan Horák, are you going to take care of doing an update to 0.7.1, or shall I?

Also what do you think wrt pushing this version to older Fedoras. I think we should leave F-17 at 0.6.2. but for F-18 I think it would be good to offer 0.7.1 as an update, agreed ?

Comment 5 Dan Horák 2013-03-06 12:02:21 UTC
Hi Hans,

currently all updates to sigil are blocked by the missing qt5 in Fedora, generally I agree with the update in F-18 to 0.7.x, but all depends on the qt5 ... I'm watching the qt5 review ticket, so I can do the update when it will become available.

Dan

Comment 6 Hans de Goede 2013-03-06 12:11:13 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Hi Hans,
> 
> currently all updates to sigil are blocked by the missing qt5 in Fedora,
> generally I agree with the update in F-18 to 0.7.x, but all depends on the
> qt5 ...

Ah, didn't now that, ok!

>  I'm watching the qt5 review ticket, so I can do the update when it
> will become available.

Ok, assigning this to you then :)

Regards,

Hans

Comment 7 Dan Horák 2013-04-15 11:44:05 UTC
*** Bug 952203 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Hans de Goede 2013-08-04 12:09:26 UTC
*** Bug 991786 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2013-09-11 11:12:56 UTC
sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2013-09-11 17:00:58 UTC
Package sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-16449/sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2013-09-22 23:58:52 UTC
sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 12 Ernesto Manríquez 2013-10-03 03:04:28 UTC
Is it possible to push this to Fedora 19 and 18? Qt5 5.1 is already packaged and released for both Fedoras.