Bug 91232 (pineutf8)
Summary: | Pine does not work properly in UTF-8 locales | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Mike A. Harris <mharris> |
Component: | pine | Assignee: | Mike A. Harris <mharris> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | edoutreleau, jpf+redhat, jshin, menthos, me, roger, thoron |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-05-20 08:30:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Mike A. Harris
2003-05-20 08:28:00 UTC
Closing bug report as NOTABUG, as this is a lack of a feature in pine and similar apps, rather than a bug. Users are encouraged to contact the upstream project authors to request and/or help them to develop UTF-8 support. *** Bug 70518 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 74115 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 77197 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 90661 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Just FYI, mutt works rather well even for CJK under UTF-8 locale. It's the best text-mode email client in terms of I18N. For others on CC interested in Pine with better UTF-8 support and I18N, Bernhard Kaindl (bernhard dot kaindl at gmx dot de) has updated and refined my patch for Pine 4.33(posted to linux-utf8 mailing list and c.m.pine) to make it work with Pine 4.5x and more importantly to make the mail header editing work better under UTF-8 terminal. Those interested in his patch may contact him directly. Judging from my email exchnages with one of Pine team members last year, it's not likely that they will accept any patch using iconv(3). Why? Don't ask me ;-). (I tried really hard to persuade him that iconv(3) is the way to go....) |