Bug 1468995 - Review Request: python-geopandas - Geographic pandas extensions
Review Request: python-geopandas - Geographic pandas extensions
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
unspecified Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On: 1468872 1468877 1481100
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2017-07-10 04:17 EDT by Elliott Sales de Andrade
Modified: 2017-08-14 02:04 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
zbyszek: fedora‑review?

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Elliott Sales de Andrade 2017-07-10 04:17:09 EDT
Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/qulogic/geopy/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00577411-python-geopandas/python-geopandas.spec
SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/qulogic/geopy/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00577411-python-geopandas/python-geopandas-0.2.1-2.fc27.src.rpm
Description: The goal of GeoPandas is to make working with geospatial data in Python easier. It combines the capabilities of Pandas and Shapely, providing geospatial operations in Pandas and a high-level interface to multiple geometries to Shapely. GeoPandas enables you to easily do operations in Python that would otherwise require a spatial database such as PostGIS.

I am seeking a sponsor; some informal reviews I have done:


Fedora Account System Username: qulogic
Comment 1 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2017-07-10 04:28:29 EDT
Also depends on a new Rtree, but I'm hoping that can be updated by the time the other requirements are reviewed.
Comment 2 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2017-08-13 11:53:11 EDT
Use use "pandas" and "Pandas", inconsistently.

I'd also recommend the trick from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468873#c2 to avoid repeating the lengthy description text.

Hmm, what's the deal with rtree? http://toblerity.org/rtree/ shows 0.7 as the latest version. Can you open a bug against the python-Rtree package? Maybe the maintainer needs to be informed about a new upstream? It also needs a python3 version for this review to proceed.

Everything looks good, but I'll wait with the rest of review until the rtree situation improves.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.